Literature DB >> 20819813

The importance of phylogeny to the study of phenological response to global climate change.

Charles C Davis1, Charles G Willis, Richard B Primack, Abraham J Miller-Rushing.   

Abstract

Climate change has resulted in major changes in the phenology--i.e. the timing of seasonal activities, such as flowering and bird migration--of some species but not others. These differential responses have been shown to result in ecological mismatches that can have negative fitness consequences. However, the ways in which climate change has shaped changes in biodiversity within and across communities are not well understood. Here, we build on our previous results that established a link between plant species' phenological response to climate change and a phylogenetic bias in species' decline in the eastern United States. We extend a similar approach to plant and bird communities in the United States and the UK that further demonstrates that climate change has differentially impacted species based on their phylogenetic relatedness and shared phenological responses. In plants, phenological responses to climate change are often shared among closely related species (i.e. clades), even between geographically disjunct communities. And in some cases, this has resulted in a phylogenetically biased pattern of non-native species success. In birds, the pattern of decline is phylogenetically biased but is not solely explained by phenological response, which suggests that other traits may better explain this pattern. These results illustrate the ways in which phylogenetic thinking can aid in making generalizations of practical importance and enhance efforts to predict species' responses to future climate change.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20819813      PMCID: PMC2981945          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  40 in total

1.  Phenological changes reflect climate change in Wisconsin.

Authors:  N L Bradley; A C Leopold; J Ross; W Huffaker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Molecular analysis of FRIGIDA, a major determinant of natural variation in Arabidopsis flowering time.

Authors:  U Johanson; J West; C Lister; S Michaels; R Amasino; C Dean
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Global climate change and introduced species in United States forests.

Authors:  D Simberloff
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 4.  Climate, changing phenology, and other life history traits: nonlinearity and match-mismatch to the environment.

Authors:  Nils Chr Stenseth; Atle Mysterud
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems.

Authors:  Camille Parmesan; Gary Yohe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Phylogenetic overdispersion in Floridian oak communities.

Authors:  J Cavender-Bares; D D Ackerly; D A Baum; F A Bazzaz
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure.

Authors:  S M Vamosi; S B Heard; J C Vamosi; C O Webb
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Phylogenetic patterns of species loss in Thoreau's woods are driven by climate change.

Authors:  Charles G Willis; Brad Ruhfel; Richard B Primack; Abraham J Miller-Rushing; Charles C Davis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Populations of migratory bird species that did not show a phenological response to climate change are declining.

Authors:  Anders Pape Møller; Diego Rubolini; Esa Lehikoinen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Control of flowering time by FLC orthologues in Brassica napus.

Authors:  M Tadege; C C Sheldon; C A Helliwell; P Stoutjesdijk; E S Dennis; W J Peacock
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.417

View more
  30 in total

1.  Climate-associated phenological advances in bee pollinators and bee-pollinated plants.

Authors:  Ignasi Bartomeus; John S Ascher; David Wagner; Bryan N Danforth; Sheila Colla; Sarah Kornbluth; Rachael Winfree
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Genetic and physiological bases for phenological responses to current and predicted climates.

Authors:  A M Wilczek; L T Burghardt; A R Cobb; M D Cooper; S M Welch; J Schmitt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Toward a synthetic understanding of the role of phenology in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Jessica Forrest; Abraham J Miller-Rushing
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Why does phenology drive species distribution?

Authors:  Isabelle Chuine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  One man, 73 years, and 25 species. Evaluating phenological responses using a lifelong study of first flowering dates.

Authors:  K Bolmgren; D Vanhoenacker; A J Miller-Rushing
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 3.787

6.  Microbial response to simulated global change is phylogenetically conserved and linked with functional potential.

Authors:  Anthony S Amend; Adam C Martiny; Steven D Allison; Renaud Berlemont; Michael L Goulden; Ying Lu; Kathleen K Treseder; Claudia Weihe; Jennifer B H Martiny
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 10.302

7.  Spring- and fall-flowering species show diverging phenological responses to climate in the Southeast USA.

Authors:  Katelin D Pearson
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 3.787

8.  Wind and rain are the primary climate factors driving changing phenology of an aerial insectivore.

Authors:  Rachel D Irons; April Harding Scurr; Alexandra P Rose; Julie C Hagelin; Tricia Blake; Daniel F Doak
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  A phylogenetic comparative study of flowering phenology along an elevational gradient in the Canadian subarctic.

Authors:  Malie Lessard-Therrien; T Jonathan Davies; Kjell Bolmgren
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 3.787

10.  Plasticity for desiccation tolerance across Drosophila species is affected by phylogeny and climate in complex ways.

Authors:  Vanessa Kellermann; Ary A Hoffmann; Johannes Overgaard; Volker Loeschcke; Carla M Sgrò
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.