Literature DB >> 18211175

Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?

Paul W Eastwick1, Eli J Finkel.   

Abstract

In paradigms in which participants state their ideal romantic-partner preferences or examine vignettes and photographs, men value physical attractiveness more than women do, and women value earning prospects more than men do. Yet it remains unclear if these preferences remain sex differentiated in predicting desire for real-life potential partners (i.e., individuals whom one has actually met). In the present study, the authors explored this possibility using speed dating and longitudinal follow-up procedures. Replicating previous research, participants exhibited traditional sex differences when stating the importance of physical attractiveness and earning prospects in an ideal partner and ideal speed date. However, data revealed no sex differences in the associations between participants' romantic interest in real-life potential partners (met during and outside of speed dating) and the attractiveness and earning prospects of those partners. Furthermore, participants' ideal preferences, assessed before the speed-dating event, failed to predict what inspired their actual desire at the event. Results are discussed within the context of R. E. Nisbett and T. D. Wilson's (1977) seminal article: Even regarding such a consequential aspect of mental life as romantic-partner preferences, people may lack introspective awareness of what influences their judgments and behavior. (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18211175     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  21 in total

Review 1.  Compassion: an evolutionary analysis and empirical review.

Authors:  Jennifer L Goetz; Dacher Keltner; Emiliana Simon-Thomas
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  "Tell me I'm sexy…and otherwise valuable:" Body Valuation and Relationship Satisfaction.

Authors:  Andrea L Meltzer; James K McNulty
Journal:  Pers Relatsh       Date:  2014-03-01

3.  Marriage, Cohabitation, and Sexual Exclusivity: Unpacking the Effect of Marriage.

Authors:  Brandon G Wagner
Journal:  Soc Forces       Date:  2018-08-04

4.  Sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for the trajectory of marital satisfaction.

Authors:  Andrea L Meltzer; James K McNulty; Grace L Jackson; Benjamin R Karney
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-10-14

5.  What Makes a Partner Ideal, and for Whom? Compatibility Tests, Filter Tests, and the Mating Stability Matrix.

Authors:  Lorenza Lucchi Basili; Pier Luigi Sacco
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-02

6.  Partnering Across the Life Course: Sex, Relationships, and Mate Selection.

Authors:  Sharon Sassler
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2010-06-18

7.  Revisiting Depression Contagion as a Mediator of the Relation Between Depression and Rejection: A Speed-Dating Study.

Authors:  Madeline L Pe; Ian H Gotlib; Wim Van den Noortgate; Peter Kuppens
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-10-30

8.  Gender Interacts with Opioid Receptor Polymorphism A118G and Serotonin Receptor Polymorphism -1438 A/G on Speed-Dating Success.

Authors:  Karen Wu; Chuansheng Chen; Robert K Moyzis; Ellen Greenberger; Zhaoxia Yu
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2016-09

9.  From preferred to actual mate characteristics: the case of human body shape.

Authors:  Alexandre Courtiol; Sandrine Picq; Bernard Godelle; Michel Raymond; Jean-Baptiste Ferdy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dominant, open nonverbal displays are attractive at zero-acquaintance.

Authors:  Tanya Vacharkulksemsuk; Emily Reit; Poruz Khambatta; Paul W Eastwick; Eli J Finkel; Dana R Carney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.