OBJECTIVE: To determine utilization and costs of home care services (hcs) for individuals with a diagnosis of breast cancer (bc). METHODS: Incident cases of invasive bc in women were extracted from the Ontario Cancer Registry (2005-2009) and linked with other Ontario health care administrative databases. Control patients were selected from the population of women never diagnosed with any type of cancer. The types and proportions of hcs used were determined and stratified by disease stage. Attributable home care utilization and costs for bc patients were determined. Factors associated with hcs costs were assessed using regression analysis. RESULTS: Among the 39,656 bc and 198,280 control patients identified (median age: 61.6 years for both), 75.4% of bc patients used hcs (62.1% stage i; 85.7% stage ii; 94.6% stage iii; 79.1% stage iv) compared with 14.6% of control patients. The number of hcs used per patient-year were significantly higher for the bc patients than for the control patients (14.97 vs. 6.13, p < 0.01), resulting in higher costs per patient-year ($1,210 vs. $325; $885 attributable cost to bc, p < 0.01). The number of hcs utilized and the associated costs increased as the bc stage increased. In contrast, hcs costs decreased as income increased and as previous health care exposure decreased. INTERPRETATION: Patients with bc used twice as many hcs, resulting in costs that were almost 4 times those observed in a matched control group. Less than an additional $1000 per bc patient per year were spent on hcs utilization in the study population.
OBJECTIVE: To determine utilization and costs of home care services (hcs) for individuals with a diagnosis of breast cancer (bc). METHODS: Incident cases of invasive bc in women were extracted from the Ontario Cancer Registry (2005-2009) and linked with other Ontario health care administrative databases. Control patients were selected from the population of women never diagnosed with any type of cancer. The types and proportions of hcs used were determined and stratified by disease stage. Attributable home care utilization and costs for bc patients were determined. Factors associated with hcs costs were assessed using regression analysis. RESULTS: Among the 39,656 bc and 198,280 control patients identified (median age: 61.6 years for both), 75.4% of bc patients used hcs (62.1% stage i; 85.7% stage ii; 94.6% stage iii; 79.1% stage iv) compared with 14.6% of control patients. The number of hcs used per patient-year were significantly higher for the bc patients than for the control patients (14.97 vs. 6.13, p < 0.01), resulting in higher costs per patient-year ($1,210 vs. $325; $885 attributable cost to bc, p < 0.01). The number of hcs utilized and the associated costs increased as the bc stage increased. In contrast, hcs costs decreased as income increased and as previous health care exposure decreased. INTERPRETATION:Patients with bc used twice as many hcs, resulting in costs that were almost 4 times those observed in a matched control group. Less than an additional $1000 per bc patient per year were spent on hcs utilization in the study population.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; costs; disease stage; home care; population-based
Authors: J A Hayman; K M Langa; M U Kabeto; S J Katz; S M DeMonner; M E Chernew; M B Slavin; A M Fendrick Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Denise N Guerriere; Ada Y M Wong; Ruth Croxford; Vivian W Leong; Patricia McKeever; Peter C Coyte Journal: Health Soc Care Community Date: 2008-03
Authors: Catherine Deri Armstrong; William E Hogg; Jacques Lemelin; Simone Dahrouge; Carmel Martin; Gary S Viner; Raphael Saginur Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Ashley C Mays; Harrison G Bartels; Paul R Wistermayer; Matt L Rohlfing; Christopher M Gentile; Ralph D'Agostino; Joshua D Waltonen Journal: Head Neck Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: N Mittmann; J M Porter; J Rangrej; S J Seung; N Liu; R Saskin; M C Cheung; N B Leighl; J S Hoch; M Trudeau; W K Evans; K N Dainty; C DeAngelis; C C Earle Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Nicole Mittmann; Natasha K Stout; Pablo Lee; Anna N A Tosteson; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Oguzhan Alagoz; Martin J Yaffe Journal: Health Rep Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 4.796
Authors: Nicole Mittmann; Ning Liu; Joan Porter; Soo Jin Seung; Pierre K Isogai; Refik Saskin; Matthew C Cheung; Natasha B Leighl; Jeffrey S Hoch; Maureen Trudeau; William K Evans; Katie N Dainty; Craig C Earle Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2014-02-04
Authors: Claire De Oliveira; Reka Pataky; Karen E Bremner; Jagadish Rangrej; Kelvin K W Chan; Winson Y Cheung; Jeffrey S Hoch; Stuart Peacock; Murray D Krahn Journal: Healthc Policy Date: 2017-02
Authors: Christopher J D Wallis; Gerard Morton; Sender Herschorn; Ronald T Kodama; Girish S Kulkarni; Sree Appu; Bobby Shayegan; Roger Buckley; Arthur Grabowski; Steven A Narod; Robert K Nam Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 7.640