Literature DB >> 18207358

Reliable time to estimate subglottal pressure.

Matthew R Hoffman1, Christopher D Baggott, Jack Jiang.   

Abstract

Measuring subglottal pressure (P(s)) with complete interruption can be problematic due to unsteady plateaus in supraglottal pressure data traces during balloon valve interruption. Subjectively determining when the graph plateaus neglect the effects of laryngeal, auditory, and other physical reflexes may alter patient effort and glottal configuration. If the P(s) estimation was made at a consistent time before the onset of reflexes, the recorded pressure would not be dependent on subjective analysis by a clinician, and intrasubject data would be more precise. Previously collected data using the airflow interruption system have shown consistency at approximately 150 milliseconds after balloon valve inflation. To evaluate the validity of estimating P(s) at this point, a theoretical and a physical model were applied. A theoretical ideal gas model of capacitance calculated the time necessary for supraglottal pressure to equilibrate with P(s). Using a mechanical pseudolung which served as a constant pressure source, known subresistor pressures were compared to the pressure measured by the interruption device. Both models confirmed the validity of measuring P(s) consistently at 150 milliseconds into the 500-millisecond interruption. In human trials testing 25 subjects, mean intrasubject standard deviation using this optimal time constant was 0.66+/-0.37cm H(2)O, and 1.11+/-0.48cm H(2)O when performing plateau analysis (P<0.0005). This novel modification to the clinically feasible interruption model for P(s) estimation demonstrates a marked improvement in the reliability of balloon valve interruption while maintaining the validity demonstrated in previous studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18207358      PMCID: PMC2795401          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  13 in total

1.  Vocal cord closure pressure during volitional swallow and other voluntary tasks.

Authors:  Reza Shaker; Kulwinder S Dua; Junlong Ren; Pengyan Xie; Akira Funahashi; Ralph M Schapira
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Subglottal and oral air pressures during phonation-preliminary investigation using a miniature transducer system.

Authors:  P Kitzing; A Löfqvist
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1975-09

3.  Studies of the human oropharyngeal airspaces using magnetic resonance imaging. I. Validation of a three-dimensional MRI method for producing ex vivo virtual and physical casts of the oropharyngeal airways during inspiration.

Authors:  Donald W McRobbie; Susan Pritchard; Rebecca A Quest
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  2003

4.  Noninvasive technique for estimating subglottic pressure and laryngeal efficiency.

Authors:  M C Bard; D H Slavit; T V McCaffrey; R J Lipton
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  Estimating subglottal pressure using incomplete airflow interruption.

Authors:  Jack Jiang; Charles Leder; Allison Bichler
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Application of a miniaturized pressure transducer for experimental speech research.

Authors:  Y Koike; W H Perkins
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr (Basel)       Date:  1968

7.  A clinical method for estimating laryngeal airway resistance during vowel production.

Authors:  J R Smitheran; T J Hixon
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1981-05

8.  Phonation threshold pressure measurements during phonation by airflow interruption.

Authors:  J Jiang; T O'Mara; D Conley; D Hanson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Aerodynamic and electroglottographic measures of normal voice production: intrasubject variability within and across sessions.

Authors:  M B Higgins; R Netsell; L Schulte
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-02

10.  Vocal efficiency measurements in subjects with vocal polyps and nodules: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Jack Jiang; Jennifer Stern; Hui-Jun Chen; Nancy Pearl Solomon
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  8 in total

1.  Measurement reliability of phonation threshold pressure in pediatric subjects.

Authors:  Matthew R Hoffman; Austin J Scholp; Calvin D Hedberg; Jim R Lamb; Maia N Braden; J Scott McMurray; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Comparison of labial and mechanical interruption for measurement of aerodynamic parameters.

Authors:  William J Chapin; Matthew R Hoffman; Adam L Rieves; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Phonation instability flow in excised canine larynges.

Authors:  Matthew R Hoffman; Adam L Rieves; Adam J Budde; Ketan Surender; Yu Zhang; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Evaluation of auditory and visual feedback for airflow interruption.

Authors:  Matthew R Hoffman; Adam L Rieves; Ketan Surender; Erin E Devine; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Indirect estimation of laryngeal resistance via airflow redirection.

Authors:  Adam L Rieves; Matthew R Hoffman; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  Differentiating between adductor and abductor spasmodic dysphonia using airflow interruption.

Authors:  Matthew R Hoffman; Jack J Jiang; Adam L Rieves; Kelsey A B McElveen; Charles N Ford
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Retest Reliability for Complete Airway Interruption Systems of Aerodynamic Measurement.

Authors:  Jim R Lamb; Sarah A Schultz; Austin J Scholp; Emily R Wendel; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Age and Sex Comparison of Aerodynamic Phonation Measurements Using Noninvasive Assessment.

Authors:  Jim R Lamb; Austin J Scholp; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.297

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.