Literature DB >> 20083278

Variations among experienced surgeons in cancer control after open radical prostatectomy.

Fernando J Bianco1, Andrew J Vickers, Angel M Cronin, Eric A Klein, James A Eastham, J Edson Pontes, Peter T Scardino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Complications and functional outcomes after prostate surgery vary among surgeons to a greater extent than may be accounted for by chance. This excessive variation is known as heterogeneity. We explored whether there is also heterogeneity among high volume surgeons with respect to cancer control after surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 7,725 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with open radical prostatectomy at 4 major American academic medical centers from 1987 to 2003 by 1 of 54 surgeons. We defined biochemical recurrence as serum prostate specific antigen 0.4 ng/ml or greater followed by a higher level. Multivariate random effects models were used to evaluate prostate cancer recurrence heterogeneity among surgeons after adjusting for case mix (prostate specific antigen, pathological stage and grade), surgery year and surgeon experience.
RESULTS: We found statistically significant heterogeneity in the prostate cancer recurrence rate independent of surgeon experience (p = 0.002). Seven experienced surgeons had an adjusted 5-year prostate cancer recurrence rate of less than 10% while another 5 had a rate that exceeded 25%. Significant heterogeneity remained on sensitivity analysis adjusting for possible differences in followup, patient selection and stage migration.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient risk of recurrence may differ depending on which of 2 surgeons is seen even if the surgeons have similar experience levels. Surgical randomized trials are imperative to determine and characterize the roots of these variations. 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20083278      PMCID: PMC3244752          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

1.  Variations among high volume surgeons in the rate of complications after radical prostatectomy: further evidence that technique matters.

Authors:  Fernando J Bianco; Elyn R Riedel; Colin B Begg; Michael W Kattan; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Mirja Ruutu; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Stefan Bratell; Anders Spångberg; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Hans Garmo; Juni Palmgren; Hans-Olov Adami; Bo Johan Norlén; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Peter Swindle; James A Eastham; Makoto Ohori; Michael W Kattan; Thomas Wheeler; Norio Maru; Kevin Slawin; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911).

Authors:  Michel Bolla; Hein van Poppel; Laurence Collette; Paul van Cangh; Kris Vekemans; Luigi Da Pozzo; Theo M de Reijke; Antony Verbaeys; Jean-François Bosset; Roland van Velthoven; Jean-Marie Maréchal; Pierre Scalliet; Karin Haustermans; Marianne Piérart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Aug 13-19       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Surgical volume is related to the rate of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in European patients.

Authors:  Felix K-H Chun; Alberto Briganti; Elie Antebi; Markus Graefen; Eike Currlin; Thomas Steuber; Thorsten Schlomm; Jochen Walz; Alexander Haese; Martin G Friedrich; Sascha A Ahyai; Christian Eichelberg; Georg Salomon; Andrea Gallina; Andreas Erbersdobler; Paul Perrotte; Hans Heinzer; Hartwig Huland; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Defining biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a proposal for a standardized definition.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Michael W Kattan; James A Eastham; Zohar A Dotan; Fernando J Bianco; Hans Lilja; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Effects of pathologic stage on the learning curve for radical prostatectomy: evidence that recurrence in organ-confined cancer is largely related to inadequate surgical technique.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Fernando J Bianco; Mithat Gonen; Angel M Cronin; James A Eastham; Deborah Schrag; Eric A Klein; Alwyn M Reuther; Michael W Kattan; J Edson Pontes; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Fernando J Bianco; Angel M Serio; James A Eastham; Deborah Schrag; Eric A Klein; Alwyn M Reuther; Michael W Kattan; J Edson Pontes; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Pooled analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer: who benefits and by how much?

Authors:  Sharlene Gill; Charles L Loprinzi; Daniel J Sargent; Stephan D Thomé; Steven R Alberts; Daniel G Haller; Jacqueline Benedetti; Guido Francini; Lois E Shepherd; Jean Francois Seitz; Roberto Labianca; Wei Chen; Stephen S Cha; Michael P Heldebrant; Richard M Goldberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-04-05       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  22 in total

1.  How do you know if you are any good? A surgeon performance feedback system for the outcomes of radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Daniel Sjoberg; Ethan Basch; Frank Sculli; Marwan Shouery; Vincent Laudone; Karim Touijer; James Eastham; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Cancer control and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy as markers of surgical quality: analysis of heterogeneity between surgeons at a single cancer center.

Authors:  Andrew Vickers; Caroline Savage; Fernando Bianco; John Mulhall; Jaspreet Sandhu; Bertrand Guillonneau; Angel Cronin; Peter Scardino
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Quoc-Dien Trinh; Anders Bjartell; Stephen J Freedland; Brent K Hollenbeck; Jim C Hu; Shahrokh F Shariat; Maxine Sun; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Impact of stage migration and practice changes on high-risk prostate cancer: results from patients treated with radical prostatectomy over the last two decades.

Authors:  Nicola Fossati; Niccolò M Passoni; Marco Moschini; Giorgio Gandaglia; Alessandro Larcher; Massimo Freschi; Giorgio Guazzoni; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  What has to happen before we report radical prostatectomy outcomes of individual surgeons to the public?

Authors:  Andrew Vickers; James Eastham
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  The diffusion of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in the United States: a case study of the introduction of new surgical devices.

Authors:  C B Anderson; E B Elkin; C L Atoria; J A Eastham; P T Scardino; K Touijer
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 5.554

7.  A case-mix-adjusted comparison of early oncological outcomes of open and robotic prostatectomy performed by experienced high volume surgeons.

Authors:  Jonathan L Silberstein; Daniel Su; Leonard Glickman; Matthew Kent; Gal Keren-Paz; Andrew J Vickers; Jonathan A Coleman; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Vincent P Laudone
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Bigger is bigger. Better is better.

Authors:  Ole Solheim; Johan Cappelen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Data and programming code from the studies on the learning curve for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-09-02

10.  Association of surgeon and hospital volume with short-term outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nationwide, population-based study.

Authors:  Rebecka Arnsrud Godtman; Erik Persson; Walter Cazzaniga; Fredrik Sandin; Stefan Carlsson; Göran Ahlgren; Eva Johansson; David Robinsson; Jonas Hugosson; Pär Stattin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.