Literature DB >> 18205736

Mechanical behavior and failure analysis of prosthetic retaining screws after long-term use in vivo. Part 4: Failure analysis of 10 fractured retaining screws retrieved from three patients.

Youssef S Al Jabbari1, Raymond Fournelle, Gerald Ziebert, Jeffrey Toth, Anthony M Iacopino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to perform a failure analysis on fractured prosthetic retaining screws after long-term use in vivo. Additionally, the study addresses the commonly asked question regarding whether complex repeated functional occlusal forces initiate fatigue-type cracks in prosthetic retaining screws.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten fractured prosthetic retaining screws retrieved from three patients treated with fixed detachable hybrid prostheses were subjected to a failure analysis. In patients 1 and 2, the middle three retaining screws of the prostheses were found fractured at retrieval time after they had been in service for 20 and 19 months, respectively. In patient 3, the middle three and one of the posterior retaining screws were found to be fractured at retrieval after they had been in service for 18 months. Low power stereomicroscopy and high-power scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were performed to analyze the fractured surfaces of the retaining screws examining fatigue cracks in greater detail.
RESULTS: Typical fatigue failure characterized by ratchet mark formation was revealed by light microscopy and SEM for all examined screws. Using low magnification light microscopy, ratchet marks were visible on the fracture surfaces of only two screws. SEM examination revealed all three classical stages of fatigue failure, and it was possible to see the ratchet marks on the fracture surfaces of all specimens, indicating a fatigue zone. The final catastrophic overload fracture appeared fibrous, indicating ductile fracture. The final overload ductile fracture surfaces showed equiaxed dimples, suggesting tensile overload in all examined screws except in two specimens that showed an elongated dimple pattern indicating shear/tearing overload forces.
CONCLUSIONS: Fracture of prosthetic retaining screws in hybrid prostheses occurs mainly through a typical fatigue mode involving mostly the middle anterior three screws. Fatigue cracks can grow in more than one prosthetic retaining screw, leading to fracture before the patient or clinician determines that any problem exists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18205736     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00291.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont        ISSN: 1059-941X            Impact factor:   2.752


  4 in total

1.  Management of fractured implant case using loop connector fixed partial denture.

Authors:  Ashish Yadav; Aratee Gupta; Amrit Tandan; Sulabh Kumar
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-05-24

2.  Prevalence of complications after the oral rehabilitation with implant-supported hybrid prostheses.

Authors:  Júlia Real-Osuna; Nieves Almendros-Marqués; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-01-01

3.  Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing.

Authors:  Cleide Gisele Ribeiro; Maria Luiza Cabral Maia; Susanne S Scherrer; Antonio Carlos Cardoso; H W Anselm Wiskott
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Comparison of implant component fractures in external and internal type: A 12-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Yuseung Yi; Jai-Young Koak; Seong-Kyun Kim; Shin-Jae Lee; Seong-Joo Heo
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.904

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.