Literature DB >> 18204377

Possible unintended consequences of a focus on performance: insights over time from the research association of practices network.

Sharon M Weyer1, Sarah Bobiak, Kurt C Stange.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New pay-for-performance initiatives and quality improvement efforts over the last decade have focused on evidenced-based process measures of quality of care. The effect on preventive service delivery (PSD) measures and patient satisfaction is not well described. The goals of this study were to describe PSD and patient satisfaction trends over the past decade.
METHODS: We evaluated delivery of US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)-recommended clinical preventive services and patient satisfaction in 3 studies conducted in the same health care market in 1995, 2000, and 2006, respectively, using previously validated measures. Trends in these 2 factors were compared using data from cross-sectional samples of 4454, 3462, and 1240 patients seen at 84, 80, and 31 participating primary care practices, respectively.
RESULTS: In the 3 time periods, patients' rate of being up to date on USPSTF-recommended preventive services increased from 29% to 33% to 38%. Similar trends were observed in subscores for counseling, screening, and immunization services. However, patient satisfaction decreased to a clinically meaningful extent from 4.26 in 1995 to 3.93 in 2006 (range = 1-5).
CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement efforts focused on evidence-based recommendations appear to be working as intended, but with the possible unintended consequence of reduced patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18204377     DOI: 10.1097/01.QMH.0000308637.04850.ac

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care        ISSN: 1063-8628            Impact factor:   0.926


  10 in total

1.  The problem of fragmentation and the need for integrative solutions.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  RISQy business (Relationships, Incentives, Supports, and Quality): evolution of the British Columbia Model of Primary Care (patient-centered medical home).

Authors:  Dan MacCarthy; Marcus J Hollander
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2014

3.  The influence of literacy on patient-reported experiences of diabetes self-management support.

Authors:  Andrea S Wallace; John R Carlson; Robb M Malone; James Joyner; Darren A Dewalt
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Defining and measuring the patient-centered medical home.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange; Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Carlos R Jaén; Benjamin F Crabtree; Susan A Flocke; James M Gill
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Incentive-Based Primary Care: Cost and Utilization Analysis.

Authors:  Marcus J Hollander; Helena Kadlec
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2015-08-05

6.  Understanding the body-mind in primary care.

Authors:  Annette Sofie Davidsen; Ann Dorrit Guassora; Susanne Reventlow
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2016-12

7.  Rapidity and modality of imaging for acute low back pain in elderly patients.

Authors:  Hoangmai H Pham; Bruce E Landon; James D Reschovsky; Beny Wu; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-25

8.  Key issues in the design of pay for performance programs.

Authors:  Frank Eijkenaar
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-09-01

Review 9.  Manifestations and implications of uncertainty for improving healthcare systems: an analysis of observational and interventional studies grounded in complexity science.

Authors:  Luci K Leykum; Holly J Lanham; Jacqueline A Pugh; Michael Parchman; Ruth A Anderson; Benjamin F Crabtree; Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Kurt C Stange; Reuben R McDaniel
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Reports of unintended consequences of financial incentives to improve management of hypertension.

Authors:  Sylvia J Hysong; Richard SoRelle; Kristen Broussard Smitham; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.