Literature DB >> 12738501

Performance of basal follicle-stimulating hormone in the prediction of poor ovarian response and failure to become pregnant after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis.

László F J M M Bancsi1, Frank J M Broekmans, Ben W J Mol, J Dik F Habbema, Egbert R te Velde.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive performance and clinical value of basal FSH as a test for ovarian reserve in in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients.
DESIGN: Meta-analysis.
SETTING: Tertiary fertility center. PATIENT(S): Patients undergoing IVF. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Poor ovarian response, nonpregnancy. RESULT(S): We located 21 studies that had reported on basal FSH and IVF outcome. No single study met high standards of methodological rigor; most studies are of moderate methodological quality only. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve indicated a moderate predictive performance for poor response, and a low predictive performance for nonpregnancy. Predictions with a substantial shift from pre-FSH-test probability to post-FSH test probability are only achieved at extreme cut-off levels for basal FSH. Sensitivity of such cut-off levels, for both the prediction of poor response and nonpregnancy, is limited. CONCLUSION(S): Clinical value of testing for basal FSH is restricted to a small minority of patients. Basal FSH should not be regarded as a useful routine test for the prediction of IVF outcome. The development of better tests to assess ovarian reserve remains of importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12738501     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00078-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  31 in total

1.  Impact of cancer therapies on ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Clarisa R Gracia; Mary D Sammel; Ellen Freeman; Maureen Prewitt; Claire Carlson; Anushree Ray; Ashley Vance; Jill P Ginsberg
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Single and repeated GnRH agonist stimulation tests compared with basal markers of ovarian reserve in the prediction of outcome in IVF.

Authors:  D J Hendriks; F J Broekmans; L F J M M Bancsi; C W N Looman; F H de Jong; E R te Velde
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Elevated basal FSH levels, if it is under 15 IU/L, will not reflect poor ART outcomes.

Authors:  Rieko Kojima; Koji Nakagawa; Akira Nakashima; Takashi Horikawa; Shirei Ohgi; Hidekazu Saito
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Diminished ovarian reserve in the United States assisted reproductive technology population: diagnostic trends among 181,536 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System.

Authors:  Kate Devine; Sunni L Mumford; Mae Wu; Alan H DeCherney; Micah J Hill; Anthony Propst
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Basal serum testosterone levels correlate with ovarian response but do not predict pregnancy outcome in non-PCOS women undergoing IVF.

Authors:  Bo Sun; Fang Wang; Jing Sun; Wenzhu Yu; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Predicting pregnancy in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization with basal serum follicle stimulating hormone levels between 10.0 and 11.9 IU/L.

Authors:  Dan Levin; Sunny H Jun; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-03-01

7.  Follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) alternative skipping of exon 2 or 3 affects ovarian response to FSH.

Authors:  Cengiz Karakaya; Ozlem Guzeloglu-Kayisli; Rebecca J Hobbs; Tsilya Gerasimova; Asli Uyar; Mehmet Erdem; Mesut Oktem; Ahmet Erdem; Seyhan Gumuslu; Deniz Ercan; Denny Sakkas; Pierre Comizzoli; Emre Seli; Maria D Lalioti
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  Enhanced hypothalamic-pituitary sensitivity to estrogen in premenopausal women with diminished ovarian reserve compared with older perimenopausal controls.

Authors:  Katie Zhang; Gohar Zeitlian; Goli Adel; Nanette F Santoro; Lubna Pal
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  The clinical analysis of poor ovarian response in in-vitro-fertilization embryo-transfer among Chinese couples.

Authors:  X M Zhen; J Qiao; R Li; L N Wang; P Liu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Individual patient data meta-analysis of diagnostic and prognostic studies in obstetrics, gynaecology and reproductive medicine.

Authors:  Kimiko A Broeze; Brent C Opmeer; Lucas M Bachmann; Frank J Broekmans; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Sjors F P J Coppus; Neil P Johnson; Khalid S Khan; Gerben ter Riet; Fulco van der Veen; Madelon van Wely; Ben W J Mol
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.