Literature DB >> 8963836

[Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases: Gold standard for solitary and radically resectable lesions].

J Scheele1, A Altendorf-Hofmann, R Stangl, K Schmidt.   

Abstract

From 1960 to 1993, a total of 1.766 patients with liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma was recorded. Five-hundred-and-eight patients (28.8%) underwent hepatic resection which was performed with curative intent in 473 patients (26.8%). 30-day mortality in this group was 4.5%, being 2.6% (4 out of 155) since 1990. Significant morbidity was observed in 16% of patients with a decrease to 7% for the last 4 years. A 99.5 percent follow-up until January 1, 1996, was achieved. Excluding operative mortality there are 376 patients with "potentially curative" initial liver resection, and 65 corresponding patients with minimal macroscopic (n = 19) or microscopic (n = 46) residual disease. The latter group demonstrated a poor prognosis with median and maximum survival times of 14.8 and 56 months, respectively. Among the 376 patients having potentially curative resection the actuarial five, ten, and twenty year survival was 39 +/- 3, 26 +/- 5 and 21 +/- 13 percent, respectively. Tumor-free survival was 34 +/- 3 percent at 5 years. In the univariate analysis, the following factors were associated with decreased crude survival: Presence and extent of mesenteric lymph node involvement (p = 0.0001), poor grading of the primary tumor (p = 0.008), synchronous diagnosis of metastases (p = 0.004), satellite metastases (p < 0.0001), an increasing metastasis diameter (p < 0.0001), preoperative CEA elevation (p = 0.0002), a resection margin of less than 1 cm (p = 0.018), extrahepatic disease (p = 0.02), non-anatomical procedures (p = 0.008), and an operative blood loss exceeding 2.000 ml (p = 0.02). With respect to disease-free survival, extrahepatic disease (p = 0.09) failed to achieve statistical significance, while patients with colon cancer and with delayed resection of synchronous metastases did significantly better than those with rectal cancer (p = 0.02) and with a simultaneous procedure (p = 0.04), respectively. Multiplicity and bilobar involvement did not affect prognosis. Similarly, no significant predictive value of an increasing number of metastases (1-3 vs > or = 4) on either overall (p = 0.35) or disease free survival (p = 0.55) was found after a radical excision of all detectable disease. Using Cox's multivariate regression analysis, presence of satellite metastases, anatomical vs non-anatomical approach, primary tumor grade and diameter of the largest metastasis all independently affected both crude and tumor-free survival (p < 0.05). With respect to survival, this was complemented by the margin of clearance (0.05 < p < 0.1), while for disease-free survival primary tumor site and time of metastasis diagnosis had some additional influence. Twenty-six patients with R0-reresection of the liver, and 32 patients with radical excision of extrahepatic recurrent disease had a subsequent 5-year survival of 57 +/- 15 percent and 32 +/- 12 percent, respectively. This confirms the effectiveness of a close follow-up policy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8963836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Swiss Surg        ISSN: 1023-9332


  14 in total

Review 1.  Ablative therapy for liver tumours.

Authors:  E A Dick; S D Taylor-Robinson; H C Thomas; W M W Gedroyc
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Resection of colorectal liver metastases revisited.

Authors:  J Scheele; C Rudroff; A Altendorf-Hofmann
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Surveillance of patients following surgery with curative intent for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Steven Gan; Katherine Wilson; Paul Hollington
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Prognostic impact of intrahepatic lymphatic and microvascular involvement in cases of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Maximilian Bockhorn; Georgios Sotiropoulos; Jan Neuhaus; George Sgourakis; Sien-Yi Sheu; Ernesto Molmenti; Christian Fingas; Tanja Trarbach; Andreja Frilling; Christoph E Broelsch
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Liver resection for colorectal metastases: results and prognostic factors with 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Nicolas Bouviez; Zaher Lakkis; Jean Lubrano; Tuxun Tuerhongjiang; Brice Paquette; Bruno Heyd; Georges Mantion
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Selection of patients for resection of colorectal metastases to the liver using diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  F D Rahusen; M A Cuesta; P J Borgstein; R P Bleichrodt; F Barkhof; T Doesburg; S Meijer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Extended resections of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S Jonas; A Thelen; C Benckert; A Spinelli; S Sammain; U Neumann; B Rudolph; P Neuhaus
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  S Blyth; A Blakeborough; M Peterson; I C Cameron; A W Majeed
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  The role of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy in rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jun Won Kim; Yong Bae Kim; Nam-Kyu Kim; Byung-Soh Min; Sang Joon Shin; Joong Bae Ahn; Woong Sub Koom; Jinsil Seong; Ki Chang Keum
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  [Right portal vein ligation prior to extended right hemihepatectomy for synchronous colorectal liver metastases].

Authors:  A H Hölscher; K Schleimer; K T E Beckurts; H G Brochhagen; D L Stippel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.