Literature DB >> 18199535

Integrating global gene expression and radiation survival parameters across the 60 cell lines of the National Cancer Institute Anticancer Drug Screen.

Sally A Amundson1, Khanh T Do, Lisa C Vinikoor, R Anthony Lee, Christine A Koch-Paiz, Jaeyong Ahn, Mark Reimers, Yidong Chen, Dominic A Scudiero, John N Weinstein, Jeffrey M Trent, Michael L Bittner, Paul S Meltzer, Albert J Fornace.   

Abstract

The 60 cell lines of the National Cancer Institute Anticancer Drug Screen (NCI-60) constitute the most extensively characterized in vitro cancer cell model. They have been tested for sensitivity to more than 100,000 potential chemotherapy agents and have been profiled extensively at the DNA, RNA, protein, functional, and pharmacologic levels. We have used the NCI-60 cell lines and three additional lines to develop a database of responses of cancer cells to ionizing radiation. We compared clonogenic survival, apoptosis, and gene expression response by microarray. Although several studies have profiled relative basal gene expression in the NCI-60, this is the first comparison of large-scale gene expression changes in response to genotoxic stress. Twenty-two genes were differentially regulated in cells with low survival after 2-Gy gamma-rays; 14 genes identified lines more sensitive to 8 Gy. Unlike reported basal gene expression patterns, changes in expression in response to radiation showed little tissue-of-origin effect, except for differentiating the lymphoblastoid cell lines from other cell types. Basal expression patterns, however, discriminated well between radiosensitive and more resistant lines, possibly being more informative than radiation response signatures. The most striking patterns in the radiation data were a set of genes up-regulated preferentially in the p53 wild-type lines and a set of cell cycle regulatory genes down-regulated across the entire NCI-60 panel. The response of those genes to gamma-rays seems to be unaffected by the myriad of genetic differences across this diverse cell set; it represents the most penetrant gene expression response to ionizing radiation yet observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18199535     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  120 in total

1.  Radiation pharmacogenomics: a genome-wide association approach to identify radiation response biomarkers using human lymphoblastoid cell lines.

Authors:  Nifang Niu; Yuxin Qin; Brooke L Fridley; Junmei Hou; Krishna R Kalari; Minjia Zhu; Tse-Yu Wu; Gregory D Jenkins; Anthony Batzler; Liewei Wang
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Developing Predictive or Prognostic Biomarkers for Charged Particle Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Michael D Story; Jing Wang
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018

Review 3.  Dysfunction of the TP53 tumor suppressor gene in lymphoid malignancies.

Authors:  Zijun Y Xu-Monette; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Yong Li; Robert Z Orlowski; Michael Andreeff; Carlos E Bueso-Ramos; Timothy C Greiner; Timothy J McDonnell; Ken H Young
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Downregulation of tNASP inhibits proliferation through regulating cell cycle-related proteins and inactive ERK/MAPK signal pathway in renal cell carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Jianzheng Fang; Hainan Wang; Wei Xi; Gong Cheng; Shangqian Wang; Shifeng Su; Shengli Zhang; Yunfei Deng; Zhen Song; Aiming Xu; Bianjiang Liu; Jingyi Cao; Zengjun Wang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-02-12

5.  Impact of Neutron Exposure on Global Gene Expression in a Human Peripheral Blood Model.

Authors:  Constantinos G Broustas; Yanping Xu; Andrew D Harken; Mashkura Chowdhury; Guy Garty; Sally A Amundson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  A gene expression signature for chemoradiosensitivity of colorectal cancer cells.

Authors:  Melanie Spitzner; Georg Emons; Frank Kramer; Jochen Gaedcke; Margret Rave-Fränk; Jens-Gerd Scharf; Peter Burfeind; Heinz Becker; Tim Beissbarth; B Michael Ghadimi; Thomas Ried; Marian Grade
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  DNA double-strand breaks: linking gene expression to chromosome morphology and mobility.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Dieter W Heermann
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Radiation-induced gene signature predicts pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Daniel S Oh; Maggie C U Cheang; Cheng Fan; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 9.  Chemical genomics for studying parasite gene function and interaction.

Authors:  Jian Li; Jing Yuan; Ken Chih-Chien Cheng; James Inglese; Xin-zhuan Su
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2013-11-09

10.  Distinct signaling pathways after higher or lower doses of radiation in three closely related human lymphoblast cell lines.

Authors:  Tzu-Pin Lu; Liang-Chuan Lai; Be-I Lin; Li-Han Chen; Tzu-Hung Hsiao; Howard L Liber; John A Cook; James B Mitchell; Mong-Hsun Tsai; Eric Y Chuang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.