Literature DB >> 24527691

Radiation-induced gene signature predicts pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Daniel S Oh1, Maggie C U Cheang, Cheng Fan, Charles M Perou.   

Abstract

The identification of biomarkers predictive of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in breast cancer patients would be an important advancement in personalized cancer therapy. In this study, we hypothesized that due to similarities between radiation- and chemotherapy-induced cellular response mechanisms, radiation-responsive genes may be useful in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Murine p53 null breast cancer cell lines representative of the luminal, basal-like and claudin-low human breast cancer subtypes were irradiated to identify radiation-responsive genes across subtypes. These murine tumor radiation-induced genes were then converted to their human orthologs, and subsequently tested as a predictor of pathologic complete response (pCR), which was validated on two independent published neoadjuvant chemotherapy datasets of genomic data with chemotherapy response. A radiation-induced gene signature consisting of 30 genes was identified on a training set of 337 human primary breast cancer tumor samples that was prognostic for survival. Mean expression of this signature was calculated for individual samples on two independent published datasets and was found to be significantly predictive of pCR. Multivariate logistic regression analysis in both independent datasets showed that this 30 gene signature added significant predictive information independent of that provided by standard clinical predictors and other gene expression-based predictors of pCR. This study provides new information for radiation-induced biology, as well as information regarding response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a possible means of improving the prediction of pCR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24527691      PMCID: PMC5017206          DOI: 10.1667/RR13485.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  61 in total

Review 1.  Beyond ATM: the protein kinase landscape of the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Ariel Bensimon; Ruedi Aebersold; Yosef Shiloh
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 4.124

2.  Survival responses of dividing and nondividing mammalian cells after treatment with hydroxyurea, arabinosylcytosine, or adriamycin.

Authors:  S C Barranco; J K Novak
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  TP53 genomics predict higher clinical and pathologic tumor response in operable early-stage breast cancer treated with docetaxel-capecitabine ± trastuzumab.

Authors:  Stefan Glück; Jeffrey S Ross; Melanie Royce; Edward F McKenna; Charles M Perou; Eli Avisar; Lin Wu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns.

Authors:  M B Eisen; P T Spellman; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes.

Authors:  Joel S Parker; Michael Mullins; Maggie C U Cheang; Samuel Leung; David Voduc; Tammi Vickery; Sherri Davies; Christiane Fauron; Xiaping He; Zhiyuan Hu; John F Quackenbush; Inge J Stijleman; Juan Palazzo; J S Marron; Andrew B Nobel; Elaine Mardis; Torsten O Nielsen; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou; Philip S Bernard
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Identification of protein clusters predictive of response to chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Laura Cortesi; Andrea Barchetti; Elisabetta De Matteis; Elena Rossi; Lara Della Casa; Luigi Marcheselli; Giovanni Tazzioli; Maria Grazia Lazzaretti; Guido Ficarra; Massimo Federico; Anna Iannone
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Integrating global gene expression and radiation survival parameters across the 60 cell lines of the National Cancer Institute Anticancer Drug Screen.

Authors:  Sally A Amundson; Khanh T Do; Lisa C Vinikoor; R Anthony Lee; Christine A Koch-Paiz; Jaeyong Ahn; Mark Reimers; Yidong Chen; Dominic A Scudiero; John N Weinstein; Jeffrey M Trent; Michael L Bittner; Paul S Meltzer; Albert J Fornace
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  p73-alpha is capable of inducing scotin and ER stress.

Authors:  Alessandro Terrinoni; Marco Ranalli; Bruno Cadot; Aida Leta; Giacinto Bagetta; Karen H Vousden; Gerry Melino
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Considerations when using the significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) algorithm.

Authors:  Ola Larsson; Claes Wahlestedt; James A Timmons
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-05-29       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Redefining prognostic factors for breast cancer: YB-1 is a stronger predictor of relapse and disease-specific survival than estrogen receptor or HER-2 across all tumor subtypes.

Authors:  Golareh Habibi; Samuel Leung; Jennifer H Law; Karen Gelmon; Hamid Masoudi; Dmitry Turbin; Michael Pollak; Torsten O Nielsen; David Huntsman; Sandra E Dunn
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  6 in total

1.  Genomic profiling in locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer and its link to DCE-MRI and overall survival.

Authors:  Sharareh Siamakpour-Reihani; Kouros Owzar; Chen Jiang; Peter M Scarbrough; Oana I Craciunescu; Janet K Horton; Holly K Dressman; Kimberly L Blackwell; Mark W Dewhirst
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.914

2.  FAS Death Receptor: A Breast Cancer Subtype-Specific Radiation Response Biomarker and Potential Therapeutic Target.

Authors:  Janet K Horton; Sharareh Siamakpour-Reihani; Chen-Ting Lee; Ying Zhou; Wei Chen; Joseph Geradts; Diane R Fels; Peter Hoang; Kathleen A Ashcraft; Jeff Groth; Hsiu-Ni Kung; Mark W Dewhirst; Jen-Tsan A Chi
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  CDK5RAP3, a New BRCA2 Partner That Regulates DNA Repair, Is Associated with Breast Cancer Survival.

Authors:  Jordi Minguillón; María José Ramírez; Llorenç Rovirosa; Pilar Bustamante-Madrid; Cristina Camps-Fajol; Gorka Ruiz de Garibay; Hermela Shimelis; Helena Montanuy; Roser Pujol; Gonzalo Hernandez; Massimo Bogliolo; Pau Castillo; Penny Soucy; Griselda Martrat; Antonio Gómez; Daniel Cuadras; María J García; Javier Gayarre; Conxi Lázaro; Javier Benítez; Fergus J Couch; Miquel Angel Pujana; Jordi Surrallés
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  Radiation Response in the Tumour Microenvironment: Predictive Biomarkers and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Niall M Byrne; Prajakta Tambe; Jonathan A Coulter
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-01-16

Review 5.  Molecular Signatures of Radiation Response in Breast Cancer: Towards Personalized Decision-Making in Radiation Treatment.

Authors:  Corey Speers; Lori J Pierce
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-11-26

Review 6.  Precision Medicine and the Role of Biomarkers of Radiotherapy Response in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  James Meehan; Mark Gray; Carlos Martínez-Pérez; Charlene Kay; Lisa Y Pang; Jennifer A Fraser; Amy V Poole; Ian H Kunkler; Simon P Langdon; David Argyle; Arran K Turnbull
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.