Literature DB >> 12066276

Patient expectation and satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty.

T Eisler1, O Svensson, A Tengström, E Elmstedt.   

Abstract

Sixty-six consecutive revision total hip arthroplasty patients were asked about their expectations regarding future pain and walking ability. Expectations were high, regardless of background factors: 92% expected to have much less pain, and 82% expected the same walking ability as after the primary arthroplasty or a much improved walking ability. Of the patients, 56% stated a non-surgeon-related origin of expectations, 7% were uncertain, and 37% said expectations derived from the surgeon. At 1 year, Harris hip score had increased from a median 45 to 77 points, but only 69% and 55% said that their expectations had been fulfilled to a very large or rather large extent regarding pain and walking ability. The only predictor of fulfilled expectations was absence of complications (odds ratio, 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-20.8). Patient satisfaction was only moderate; 63% were very or rather satisfied with a moderate correlation (0.46-0.47) between satisfaction and fulfilled expectations. Patients with a poor preoperative hip condition generally were more satisfied (odds ratio, 5.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-17.9), and the most important reason probably was an improved walking ability (r = 0.64). Patient dissatisfaction may originate from unrealistic expectations. At preoperative consultation, it is recommended that the surgeon discuss the revision patient's expectations, especially regarding future walking ability, and inform the patient about the fundamental prognostic differences between revision and primary hip arthroplasty. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12066276     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.31245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  37 in total

1.  Individual expectation: an overlooked, but pertinent, factor in the treatment of individuals experiencing musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Joshua A Cleland
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-06-30

2.  Patient expectations of hip and knee joint replacement surgery and postoperative health status.

Authors:  Marita Cross; Helen Lapsley; Annica Barcenilla; David Parker; Myles Coolican; Lyn March
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Sports activity after total hip and knee arthroplasty : specific recommendations concerning tennis.

Authors:  Thorsten M Seyler; Michael A Mont; Phillip S Ragland; Munaf M Kachwala; Ronald E Delanois
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Clarifying the expectations of patients undergoing implant breast reconstruction: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Laura Snell; Colleen McCarthy; Anne Klassen; Stefan Cano; Lisa Rubin; Karen Hurley; Guy H Montgomery; Peter G Cordeiro; Andrea Pusic
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  Racial and ethnic differences in the experience and treatment of noncancer pain.

Authors:  Samantha M Meints; Alejandro Cortes; Calia A Morais; Robert R Edwards
Journal:  Pain Manag       Date:  2019-05-29

Review 6.  Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer Waljee; Evan P McGlinn; Erika Davis Sears; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Predictors of pain and use of pain medications following primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): 5,707 THAs at 2-years and 3,289 THAs at 5-years.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; David Lewallen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  A nationwide analysis of risk factors for in-hospital myocardial infarction after total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mariano E Menendez; Stavros G Memtsoudis; Marion Opperer; Friedrich Boettner; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Pain after total hip arthroplasty: a psychiatric point of view.

Authors:  V Pacault-Legendre; P Anract; M Mathieu; J P Courpied
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Knee arthroplasty: are patients' expectations fulfilled? A prospective study of pain and function in 102 patients with 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Anna K Nilsdotter; Sören Toksvig-Larsen; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.