Literature DB >> 18196294

Muscle thickness changes during abdominal hollowing: an assessment of between-day measurement error in controls and patients with chronic low back pain.

Anne F Mannion1, Natascha Pulkovski, Deborah Gubler, Mark Gorelick, David O'Riordan, Thanasis Loupas, Peter Schenk, Hans Gerber, Haiko Sprott.   

Abstract

Spine stabilization exercises, in which patients are taught to perform isolated contractions of the transverses abdominus (TrA) during "abdominal hollowing", are a popular physiotherapeutic treatment for low back pain (LBP). Successful performance is typically judged by the relative increase in TrA thickness compared with that of the internal (OI) and external (OE) oblique muscles, measured using ultrasound. The day-to-day measurement error (imprecision) associated with these indices of preferential activation has not been assessed but is important to know since it influences the interpretation of changes after treatment. On 2 separate days, 14 controls and 14 patients with chronic LBP (cLBP) performed abdominal hollowing exercises in hook-lying, while M-mode ultrasound images superimposed with tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) data were recorded from the abdominal muscles (N = 5 on each side). The fascial lines bordering the TrA, OI and OE were digitized, and muscle thicknesses were calculated. The between-day error (intra-observer) was expressed as the standard error of measurement, SEM; SEM as a percentage of the mean gave the coefficient of variation (CV). There were no significant between-day differences for the mean values of resting or maximal thickness for any muscle, in either group (P > 0.05). The median SEM and CV of all thickness variables was 0.71 mm and 10.9%, respectively for the controls and 0.80 mm or 11.3%, respectively for the cLBP patients. For the contraction ratios (muscle thickness contracted/thickness at rest), the CVs were 3-11% (controls) and 5-12% (patients). The CVs were unacceptably high (30-50%, both groups) for the TrA preferential activation ratio (TrA proportion of the total lateral abdominal muscle thickness when contracted minus at rest). In both the controls and patients, the precision of measurement of absolute muscle thickness and relative change in thickness during abdominal hollowing was acceptable, and commensurate with that typical of biological measurements. The TrA preferential activation ratio is too imprecise to be of clinical use. Knowledge of the SEM for these indices is essential for interpreting the clinical relevance of any changes observed following physiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18196294      PMCID: PMC2295268          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0589-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  23 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness.

Authors:  D E Beaton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science.

Authors:  W G Hopkins
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Measurement of muscle contraction with ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  P W Hodges; L H M Pengel; R D Herbert; S C Gandevia
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  The relationship between EMG and change in thickness of transversus abdominis.

Authors:  J M McMeeken; I D Beith; D J Newham; P Milligan; D J Critchley
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 5.  Specific stabilisation exercise for spinal and pelvic pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paulo H Ferreira; Manuela L Ferreira; Christopher G Maher; Robert D Herbert; Kathryn Refshauge
Journal:  Aust J Physiother       Date:  2006

6.  Can activity within the external abdominal oblique be measured using real-time ultrasound imaging?

Authors:  E K John; I D Beith
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Evaluation of the relationship between laboratory and clinical tests of transversus abdominis function.

Authors:  P Hodges; C Richardson; G Jull
Journal:  Physiother Res Int       Date:  1996

8.  Abdominal muscle size and symmetry in normal subjects.

Authors:  Gabrielle Rankin; Maria Stokes; Dianne J Newham
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.217

9.  Functional tests in elderly osteoarthritic subjects: variability of performance.

Authors:  T Howe; J Oldham
Journal:  Nurs Stand       Date:  1995 Apr 12-18

10.  Intra-tester reproducibility of pressure biofeedback in measurement of transversus abdominis function.

Authors:  Kjersti Storheim; Kari Bø; Olav Pederstad; Reidun Jahnsen
Journal:  Physiother Res Int       Date:  2002
View more
  29 in total

1.  Spine stabilisation exercises in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a good clinical outcome is not associated with improved abdominal muscle function.

Authors:  A F Mannion; F Caporaso; N Pulkovski; H Sprott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Reliability of real-time ultrasound measurement of transversus abdominis thickness in healthy trained subjects.

Authors:  Rafael Gnat; Edward Saulicz; Barbara Miądowicz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Differences in transverse abdominis activation with stable and unstable bridging exercises in individuals with low back pain.

Authors:  Susan A Saliba; Ted Croy; Rebecca Guthrie; Dustin Grooms; Arthur Weltman; Terry L Grindstaff
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2010-06

4.  Intra-rater reliability of transversus abdominis measurement by a novice examiner: Comparison of "freehand" to "probe force device" method of real-time ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Vanessa L Kennedy; Carol A Flavell; Kenji Doma
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2019-02-25

5.  The effect of food consumption on the thickness of abdominal muscles, employing ultrasound measurements.

Authors:  Ramin Kordi; Mohsen Rostami; Pardis Noormohammadpour; Mohammad Ali Mansournia
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Ultrasound assessment of transversus abdominis muscle contraction ratio during abdominal hollowing: a useful tool to distinguish between patients with chronic low back pain and healthy controls?

Authors:  N Pulkovski; A F Mannion; F Caporaso; V Toma; D Gubler; D Helbling; H Sprott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Stabilization exercise affects function of transverse abdominis and pelvic floor muscles in women with postpartum lumbo-pelvic pain: a double-blinded randomized clinical trial study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ehsani; Nasrin Sahebi; Sanaz Shanbehzadeh; Amir Massoud Arab; Shabnam ShahAli
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Abdominal muscle size and symmetry at rest and during abdominal hollowing exercises in healthy control subjects.

Authors:  A F Mannion; N Pulkovski; V Toma; H Sprott
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Cocontraction of ankle dorsiflexors and transversus abdominis function in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Seung-Chul Chon; Joshua H You; Susan A Saliba
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  An investigation of the reproducibility of ultrasound measures of abdominal muscle activation in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa; Chris G Maher; Jane Latimer; Paul W Hodges; Debra Shirley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.