Literature DB >> 19172732

Abdominal muscle size and symmetry at rest and during abdominal hollowing exercises in healthy control subjects.

A F Mannion1, N Pulkovski, V Toma, H Sprott.   

Abstract

The symmetry of, and physical characteristics influencing, the thickness of the lateral abdominal muscles at rest and during abdominal exercises were examined in 57 healthy subjects (20 men, 37 women; aged 22-62 years). M-mode ultrasound images were recorded from the abdominal muscles at rest and during abdominal hollowing exercises in hook-lying. The fascial lines bordering the transvs. abdominis, obliquus internus and obliquus externus were digitized and the absolute thickness, relative thickness (% of total lateral thickness) and contraction ratio (thickness during hollowing/thickness at rest), as well as the asymmetry (difference between sides expressed as a percent of the smallest value for the two sides) for each of these parameters were determined for each muscle. Both at rest and during hollowing, obliquus internus was the thickest and transvs. abdominis the thinnest muscle. There were no significant differences between left and right sides for group mean thicknesses of any muscle; however, individual asymmetries were evident, with mean values for the different muscles ranging from 11% to 26%; asymmetry was much less for the contraction ratios (mean % side differences, 5-14% depending on muscle). Body mass was the most significant positive predictor of absolute muscle thickness, for all muscles at rest and during hollowing, accounting for 30-44% variance. Body mass index explained 20-30% variance in transvs. abdominis contraction ratio (negative relationship). The influence of these confounders must be considered in comparative studies of healthy controls and back pain patients, unless groups are very carefully matched. Asymmetries observed in patients should be interpreted with caution, as they are also common in healthy subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19172732      PMCID: PMC2526114          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00946.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  40 in total

1.  Measurement of muscle contraction with ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  P W Hodges; L H M Pengel; R D Herbert; S C Gandevia
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  Body mass index as a measure of body fatness: age- and sex-specific prediction formulas.

Authors:  P Deurenberg; J A Weststrate; J C Seidell
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.718

3.  Effects of different levels of torso coactivation on trunk muscular and kinematic responses to posteriorly applied sudden loads.

Authors:  Francisco J Vera-Garcia; Stephen H M Brown; John R Gray; Stuart M McGill
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging: the roadmap ahead.

Authors:  Deydre S Teyhen
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Abdominal muscle size and symmetry in normal subjects.

Authors:  Gabrielle Rankin; Maria Stokes; Dianne J Newham
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.217

6.  Body fatness, relative weight and frame size in young adults.

Authors:  J A Baecke; J Burema; P Deurenberg
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  Influence of age and duration of symptoms on fibre type distribution and size of the back muscles in chronic low back pain patients.

Authors:  A F Mannion; L Käser; E Weber; A Rhyner; J Dvorak; M Müntener
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Relationships among lateral abdominal muscles, gender, body mass index, and hand dominance.

Authors:  Barbara A Springer; Billie J Mielcarek; Tiffany K Nesfield; Deydre S Teyhen
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  Prediction and validation of total and regional skeletal muscle mass by ultrasound in Japanese adults.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Sanada; Charles F Kearns; Taishi Midorikawa; Takashi Abe
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Human skeletal muscle function: description of tests and normal values.

Authors:  R H Edwards; A Young; G P Hosking; D A Jones
Journal:  Clin Sci Mol Med       Date:  1977-03
View more
  18 in total

1.  Lateral abdominal muscle symmetry in collegiate single-sided rowers.

Authors:  Norman W Gill; Beth E Mason; J Parry Gerber
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-02

2.  Spine stabilisation exercises in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a good clinical outcome is not associated with improved abdominal muscle function.

Authors:  A F Mannion; F Caporaso; N Pulkovski; H Sprott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Ultrasound assessment of asymmetric hypertrophy of the rectus abdominis muscle and prevalence of associated injury in professional tennis players.

Authors:  Ramon Balius; Carles Pedret; Piero Galilea; Fernando Idoate; Angel Ruiz-Cotorro
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The effect of food consumption on the thickness of abdominal muscles, employing ultrasound measurements.

Authors:  Ramin Kordi; Mohsen Rostami; Pardis Noormohammadpour; Mohammad Ali Mansournia
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Ultrasound assessment of transversus abdominis muscle contraction ratio during abdominal hollowing: a useful tool to distinguish between patients with chronic low back pain and healthy controls?

Authors:  N Pulkovski; A F Mannion; F Caporaso; V Toma; D Gubler; D Helbling; H Sprott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Internal and External Oblique Muscle Asymmetry in Sprint Hurdlers and Sprinters: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Lauren Adams; Nicolas Pace; Austin Heo; Iain Hunter; A Wayne Johnson; Ulrike H Mitchell
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Cocontraction of ankle dorsiflexors and transversus abdominis function in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Seung-Chul Chon; Joshua H You; Susan A Saliba
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  COMPARISON OF LATERAL ABDOMINAL MUSCLE THICKNESS IN YOUNG MALE SOCCER PLAYERS WITH AND WITHOUT LOW BACK PAIN.

Authors:  Pardis Noormohammadpour; Shadi Mirzaei; Navid Moghadam; Mohammad Ali Mansournia; Ramin Kordi
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-04

9.  Ultrasound evaluation of the symmetry of abdominal muscles in mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Paweł Linek; Edward Saulicz; Tomasz Wolny; Andrzej Myśliwiec; Anna Gogola
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-02-17

10.  Effects of different types of contraction in abdominal bracing on the asymmetry of left and right abdominal muscles.

Authors:  Sung-Hyun Park; Min-Young Song; Hyeon-Ji Park; Ji-Hyun Park; Hyun-Young Bae; Da-Som Lim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-12-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.