Literature DB >> 22889653

Cocontraction of ankle dorsiflexors and transversus abdominis function in patients with low back pain.

Seung-Chul Chon1, Joshua H You, Susan A Saliba.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The abdominal draw-in maneuver (ADIM) with cocontraction has been shown to be a more effective method of activating the transversus abdominis (TrA) in healthy adults than the ADIM alone. Whether such an augmented core stabilization exercise is effective in managing low back pain (LBP) remains uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of 2 weeks of ADIM and cocontraction training on abdominal muscle thickness and activation timing and to monitor pain and function in patients with LBP.
DESIGN: Case-control study.
SETTING: Local orthopaedic clinic and research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Twenty patients with mechanical LBP (age = 27.20 ± 6.46 years, height = 166.25 ± 8.70 cm, mass = 58.10 ± 11.81 kg) and 20 healthy, age-matched people (age = 24.25 ± 1.59 years, height = 168.00 ± 8.89 cm, mass = 60.65 ± 11.99 kg) volunteered for the study. INTERVENTION(S): Both the LBP and control groups received ten 30-minute sessions of ADIM and cocontraction training of the tibialis anterior (TA) and rectus femoris (RF) muscles over a 2-week period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): A separate, mixed-model analysis of variance was computed for the thicknesses of the TrA, internal oblique (IO), and external oblique muscles. The differences in mean and peak electromyographic (EMG) amplitudes, onset time, and latency were compared between the groups. The visual analog pain scale, Pain Disability Index, and LBP rating scale were used to assess pain in the LBP group before and after the intervention.
RESULTS: We found an interaction between the LBP and control groups and a main effect from pretest to posttest for only TrA muscle thickness change (F₁,₃₈ = 6.57, P = .01). Reductions in all pain measures were observed after training (P < .05). Group differences in peak and mean EMG amplitudes and onset time values for TrA/IO and TA were achieved (P < .05). The RF peak (t₃₈ = 3.12, P = .003) and mean (t₃₈ = 4.12, P = .001) EMG amplitudes were different, but no group difference was observed in RF onset time (t₃₈ = 1.63, P = .11) or the cocontracted TrA/IO peak (t₃₈ = 1.90, P = .07) and mean (t₃₈ = 1.81, P = .08). The test-retest reliability for the muscle thickness measure revealed excellent correlations (intraclass correlation coefficient range, 0.95-0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: We are the first to demonstrate that a cocontraction of the ankle dorsiflexors with ADIM training might result in a thickness change in the TrA muscle and associated pain management in patients with chronic LBP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22889653      PMCID: PMC3396297          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.4.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  51 in total

1.  Measurement of muscle contraction with ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  P W Hodges; L H M Pengel; R D Herbert; S C Gandevia
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  The relationship between EMG and change in thickness of transversus abdominis.

Authors:  J M McMeeken; I D Beith; D J Newham; P Milligan; D J Critchley
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Effect of the abdominal draw-in manoeuvre in combination with ankle dorsiflexion in strengthening the transverse abdominal muscle in healthy young adults: a preliminary, randomised, controlled study.

Authors:  Seung-Chul Chon; Ki-Yeon Chang; Joshua Sung H You
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 3.358

4.  Randomized controlled trial of specific spinal stabilization exercises and conventional physiotherapy for recurrent low back pain.

Authors:  Mindy C Cairns; Nadine E Foster; Chris Wright
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Changes in trunk muscle activation and lumbar-pelvic position associated with abdominal hollowing and reach during a simulated manual material handling task.

Authors:  Heather L Butler; Cheryl L Hubley-Kozey; John W Kozey
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  The effect of abdominal stabilization contractions on posteroanterior spinal stiffness.

Authors:  Tasha Stanton; Greg Kawchuk
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  A systematic review of the reliability of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging for the quantitative assessment of the abdominal and lumbar trunk muscles.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Hebert; Shane L Koppenhaver; Eric C Parent; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  John D Childs; Sara R Piva; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Expert opinion and controversies in musculoskeletal and sports medicine: core stabilization as a treatment for low back pain.

Authors:  Christopher J Standaert; Stanley A Herring
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 10.  Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis.

Authors:  Liset H M Pengel; Robert D Herbert; Chris G Maher; Kathryn M Refshauge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.