Literature DB >> 18189571

The ability to listen with independent ears.

Frederick J Gallun1, Christine R Mason, Gerald Kidd.   

Abstract

In three experiments, listeners identified speech processed into narrow bands and presented to the right ("target") ear. The ability of listeners to ignore (or even use) conflicting contralateral stimulation was examined by presenting various maskers to the target ear ("ipsilateral") and nontarget ear ("contralateral"). Theoretically, an absence of contralateral interference would imply selectively attending to only the target ear; the presence of interference from the contralateral stimulus would imply that listeners were unable to treat the stimuli at the two ears independently; and improved performance in the presence of informative contralateral stimulation would imply that listeners can process the signals at both ears and keep them separate rather than combining them. Experiments showed evidence of the ability to selectively process (or respond to) only the target ear in some, but not all, conditions. No evidence was found for improved performance due to contralateral stimulation. The pattern of interference found across experiments supports an interaction of stimulus-based factors (auditory grouping) and task-based factors (demand for processing resources) and suggests that listeners may not always be able to listen to the "better" ear even when it would be beneficial to do so.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18189571     DOI: 10.1121/1.2780143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  Listening to every other word: examining the strength of linkage variables in forming streams of speech.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Virginia Best; Christine R Mason
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Asymmetric temporal envelope encoding: Implications for within- and across-ear envelope comparison.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Dichotic listening performance with cochlear-implant simulations of ear asymmetry is consistent with difficulty ignoring clearer speech.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Daniel Eisenberg; Kristina DeRoy Milvae
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.157

4.  Selective spatial attention modulates bottom-up informational masking of speech.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Caitlin Corkhill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  An auditory-visual tradeoff in susceptibility to clutter.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Rachel N Denison; Denis G Pelli; Thuy Tien C Le; Antje Ihlefeld
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.