Literature DB >> 11768557

Manometry of the gastrointestinal tract: toy or tool?

A J Smout1.   

Abstract

In the eyes of scientific researchers, there are various manometric techniques that are useful tools for studying the motility of the gastrointestinal tract. Clinicians, however, regard most of these techniques as toys, either because they do not lead to clinically relevant results, or because they are too cumbersome in clinical practice. Nevertheless, a number of manometric techniques have reached the status of clinically relevant diagnostic procedure in gastroenterology. Among these, oesophageal manometry is the most important. Not only has conventional oesophageal manometry been added to the diagnostic armamentarium of many hospitals, but also prolonged ambulatory recording of oesophageal pressures (usually combined with pH monitoring). Small intestinal manometry has also gained the status of a diagnostic tool, in particular in patients in whom the existence of pseudo-obstruction syndrome is suspected and in patients in whom total colectomy is considered because of intractable constipation. Sphincter of Oddi manometry is another example of a clinically relevant manometric technique to be used in particular in patients with suspected dyskinesia of the sphincter of Oddi. The value of anorectal manometry may have been overestimated in the past. The most important indication is the exclusion of Hirschsprung disease. The contribution of anorectal manometry to the diagnosis of anismus and to the work-up of patients with faecal incontinence is limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11768557     DOI: 10.1080/003655201753265415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl        ISSN: 0085-5928


  6 in total

Review 1.  Investigation and management of chronic dysphagia.

Authors:  Paula Leslie; Paul N Carding; Janet A Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-22

2.  Non-invasive measurement of pan-colonic pressure over a whole digestive cycle: clinical applications of a capsule-style manometric system.

Authors:  Wen-Qiang Zhang; Guo-Zheng Yan; Lian-Zhi Yu; Xin-Qing Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Discriminative value of anorectal manometry in clinical practice.

Authors:  Naeem Raza; Klaus Bielefeldt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Referral for anorectal function evaluation is indicated in 65% and beneficial in 92% of patients.

Authors:  Maria M Szojda; Erik Tanis; Chris J J Mulder; Richelle J F Felt-Bersma
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Intestinal manometry: who needs it?

Authors:  Gabrio Bassotti; Sara Bologna; Laura Ottaviani; Michele Russo; Maria Pina Dore
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2015

6.  Anismus, Physiology, Radiology: Is It Time for Some Pragmatism? A Comparative Study of Radiological and Anorectal Physiology Findings in Patients With Anismus.

Authors:  Umberto Pisano; Lesley Irvine; Justina Szczachor; Ahsin Jawad; Andrew MacLeod; Michael Lim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2016-10-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.