Literature DB >> 14668584

Safety and effectiveness of temperature-controlled radio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal (Secca procedure) for the treatment of fecal incontinence.

Jonathan E Efron1, Marvin L Corman, James Fleshman, Jeffrey Barnett, Deborah Nagle, Elisa Birnbaum, Eric G Weiss, Juan J Nogueras, Scott Sligh, John Rabine, Steven D Wexner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This multicenter study evaluated the safety and efficacy of radio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal for the treatment of fecal incontinence.
METHODS: Fifty patients at five centers were enrolled. All reported fecal incontinence at least once per week for three months, and medical and/or surgical management failed to help their symptoms. At baseline and at six months, patients completed questionnaires (Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence score (0-20), fecal incontinence-related quality of life, Short Form-36, and visual analog scale) and underwent anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasound, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing. On an outpatient basis using local anesthesia, radio-frequency energy was delivered via an anoscopic device with multiple needle electrodes (Secca system) to create thermal lesions deep to the mucosa of the anal canal.
RESULTS: Forty-three females and seven males (aged 61.1 +/- 13.4 (mean +/- standard deviation); range, 30-80 years) were treated. Mean duration of fecal incontinence was 14.9 years. Treatment time was 37 +/- 9 minutes. At six months, the mean Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence score improved from 14.5 to 11.1 (P < 0.0001). All parameters in the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scales were improved (lifestyle (from 2.5-3.1; P < 0.0001); coping (from 1.9-2.4; P < 0.0001), depression (from 2.8-3.3; P = 0.0004); embarrassment (from 1.9-2.5; P < 0.0001)). Responders, as assessed by a systematic referenced analog scale, reported a median 70 percent resolution of symptoms. The mean Short Form-36 social function improved from 64.3 to 76 (P = 0.003). There were no changes in endoanal ultrasound or pudendal nerve terminal motor latency assessment, or in anal manometry. Complications included mucosal ulceration (one superficial, one with underlying muscle injury) and delayed bleeding (n = 1).
CONCLUSION: This multicenter trial demonstrates that radio-frequency energy can be safely delivered to the lower rectum and anal canal. The Secca procedure significantly improved the Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence score and the overall quality of life for most patients having undergone the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14668584     DOI: 10.1007/BF02660763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  23 in total

Review 1.  Fecal incontinence: an up-to-date critical overview of surgical treatment options.

Authors:  Christophe Müller; Orlin Belyaev; Thomas Deska; Ansgar Chromik; Dirk Weyhe; Waldemar Uhl
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Marat Khaikin; Steven-D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Tracy Hull
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-05

4.  The Secca procedure for the treatment of fecal incontinence: definitive therapy or short-term solution.

Authors:  Christine J Parisien; Marvin L Corman
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-02

Review 5.  Current management of fecal incontinence: choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Ann M Van Koughnett; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Update on the Management of Fecal Incontinence for the Gastroenterologist.

Authors:  Arnold Wald
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2016-03

Review 7.  Current management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Jennifer Y Wang; Maher A Abbas
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2013

Review 8.  Current status: new technologies for the treatment of patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Andreas M Kaiser; Guy R Orangio; Massarat Zutshi; Suraj Alva; Tracy L Hull; Peter W Marcello; David A Margolin; Janice F Rafferty; W Donald Buie; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  [Fecal incontinence].

Authors:  J Braun; S Willis
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Clinical response and sustainability of treatment with temperature-controlled radiofrequency energy (Secca) in patients with faecal incontinence: 3 years follow-up.

Authors:  T J Lam; A P Visscher; M M Meurs-Szojda; R J F Felt-Bersma
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.