BACKGROUND: The purpose was to determine if postradiotherapy (RT) neck dissection can be limited to the neck levels of residual adenopathy on post-RT computed tomography (CT). METHODS: In all, 274 patients with lymph node-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were treated with definitive RT. All patients had a contrast-enhanced CT performed 4 weeks after completing RT to evaluate tumor response. Two hundred eleven heminecks were dissected, either planned pre-RT or because of residual adenopathy on post-RT CT. CT images were reviewed to determine the presence and location of residual adenopathy. Radiographic complete response (rCR) was defined as lymph node size < or =1.5 cm and normal radiographic morphology (no filling defects or calcifications). For each neck level the CT findings were correlated with neck dissection pathology. RESULTS: Correlation of CT nodal response with neck dissection pathology revealed the following negative predictive values of rCR: level I, 100%; level II, 95%; level III, 98%; level IV, 96%; and level V, 96%. A subset analysis was performed on 61 neck levels with initially positive lymph nodes that completely responded to RT that were in a hemineck with residual lymphadenopathy elsewhere in the neck. Correlation of nodal response on CT to pathology indicated a negative predictive value of an rCR of 95% for this high-risk scenario. In 71 heminecks that underwent a selective neck dissection (defined as dissection of less than levels I-V) the 5-year neck control rate was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: rCR on post-RT CT has a negative predictive value of > or =95% for each neck level. This suggests that limiting neck dissection based on post-RT CT is safe.
BACKGROUND: The purpose was to determine if postradiotherapy (RT) neck dissection can be limited to the neck levels of residual adenopathy on post-RT computed tomography (CT). METHODS: In all, 274 patients with lymph node-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were treated with definitive RT. All patients had a contrast-enhanced CT performed 4 weeks after completing RT to evaluate tumor response. Two hundred eleven heminecks were dissected, either planned pre-RT or because of residual adenopathy on post-RT CT. CT images were reviewed to determine the presence and location of residual adenopathy. Radiographic complete response (rCR) was defined as lymph node size < or =1.5 cm and normal radiographic morphology (no filling defects or calcifications). For each neck level the CT findings were correlated with neck dissection pathology. RESULTS: Correlation of CT nodal response with neck dissection pathology revealed the following negative predictive values of rCR: level I, 100%; level II, 95%; level III, 98%; level IV, 96%; and level V, 96%. A subset analysis was performed on 61 neck levels with initially positive lymph nodes that completely responded to RT that were in a hemineck with residual lymphadenopathy elsewhere in the neck. Correlation of nodal response on CT to pathology indicated a negative predictive value of an rCR of 95% for this high-risk scenario. In 71 heminecks that underwent a selective neck dissection (defined as dissection of less than levels I-V) the 5-year neck control rate was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: rCR on post-RT CT has a negative predictive value of > or =95% for each neck level. This suggests that limiting neck dissection based on post-RT CT is safe.
Authors: Ian Ganly; Jennifer Bocker; Diane L Carlson; Salvatore D'Arpa; Maria Coleman; Nancy Lee; David G Pfister; Jatin P Shah; Snehal G Patel Journal: Head Neck Date: 2010-11-04 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: William M Mendenhall; Robert J Amdur; Christopher G Morris; Jessica Kirwan; Peter T Dziegielewski; John W Werning Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2015-06-14 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Chad Tang; Clifton D Fuller; Adam S Garden; Musaddiq J Awan; Rivka R Colen; William H Morrison; Steven J Frank; Beth M Beadle; Jack Phan; Erich M Sturgis; Mark E Zafereo; Randal S Weber; David I Rosenthal; G Brandon Gunn Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Alfredo Páez-Carpio; Santiago Medrano-Martorell; Joan Berenguer; Africa Muxí; Isabel Vilaseca; Izaskun Valduvieco; Paola Castillo; Neus Baste; F Xavier Avilés-Jurado; Juan José Grau; Laura Oleaga Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2022-10-01 Impact factor: 3.236
Authors: J D Hamilton; S Ahmed; V C Sandulache; S P Daram; T J Ow; H D Skinner; A Rao; L E Ginsberg; A J Kumar; J N Myers Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: William R Kennedy; Michael P Herman; Rohan L Deraniyagala; Robert J Amdur; John W Werning; Peter T Dziegielewski; Christopher G Morris; William M Mendenhall Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 2.503