BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We sought to characterize the pattern of lymph node regression and morphology following definitive radiation therapy (RT) for human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma in patients with disease control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiographically positive cervical lymph nodes from patients treated with definitive RT for HPV-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma were segmented on initial pre- and subsequent post-RT contrast enhanced CT images. Pre-specified quantitative nodal parameters were calculated. Initial nodal parameter correlates of final nodal size, final nodal volume, and time to <1 cm short-axis diameter were determined. RESULTS: Sixty-six radiographically positive lymph node were analyzed in 36 patients. Lymph nodes exhibited initial volume decreases with size stabilization at ∼4 months. Fifteen nodes (23%) underwent complete radiographic response (median 6.4 months following RT; range 2.9-25.6 months). On multivariate time-to-event analysis, initial hypodense/fat component, nodal volume, and short-axis diameter exhibited inverse association, while higher HU standard deviation exhibited a positive association, with reaching <1 cm short-axis diameter (all p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed a substantial decrease in nodal volume within the first 1-2 months following RT. These findings support our current nodal imaging paradigm, propose a quantitative methodology, and describe a reference dataset for further validation and comparison studies.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We sought to characterize the pattern of lymph node regression and morphology following definitive radiation therapy (RT) for human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma in patients with disease control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiographically positive cervical lymph nodes from patients treated with definitive RT for HPV-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma were segmented on initial pre- and subsequent post-RT contrast enhanced CT images. Pre-specified quantitative nodal parameters were calculated. Initial nodal parameter correlates of final nodal size, final nodal volume, and time to <1 cm short-axis diameter were determined. RESULTS: Sixty-six radiographically positive lymph node were analyzed in 36 patients. Lymph nodes exhibited initial volume decreases with size stabilization at ∼4 months. Fifteen nodes (23%) underwent complete radiographic response (median 6.4 months following RT; range 2.9-25.6 months). On multivariate time-to-event analysis, initial hypodense/fat component, nodal volume, and short-axis diameter exhibited inverse association, while higher HU standard deviation exhibited a positive association, with reaching <1 cm short-axis diameter (all p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed a substantial decrease in nodal volume within the first 1-2 months following RT. These findings support our current nodal imaging paradigm, propose a quantitative methodology, and describe a reference dataset for further validation and comparison studies.
Authors: Hiroya Ojiri; Anthony A Mancuso; William M Mendenhall; Scott P Stringer Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2002 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Vincent Grégoire; Peter Levendag; Kian K Ang; Jacques Bernier; Marijel Braaksma; Volker Budach; Cliff Chao; Emmanuel Coche; Jay S Cooper; Guy Cosnard; Avraham Eisbruch; Samy El-Sayed; Bahman Emami; Cai Grau; Marc Hamoir; Nancy Lee; Philippe Maingon; Karin Muller; Hervé Reychler Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: M W van den Brekel; H V Stel; J A Castelijns; J J Nauta; I van der Waal; J Valk; C J Meyer; G B Snow Journal: Radiology Date: 1990-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: David I Rosenthal; Joshua A Asper; Jerry L Barker; Adam S Garden; K S Clifford Chao; William H Morrison; Randal S Weber; K Kian Ang Journal: Head Neck Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Chad Tang; Cato Chan; Wen Jiang; James D Murphy; Rie von Eyben; A Dimitrios Colevas; Harlan Pinto; Nancy Lee-Enriquez; Christina Kong; Quynh-Thu Le Journal: Head Neck Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Stanley L Liauw; Anthony A Mancuso; Robert J Amdur; Christopher G Morris; Douglas B Villaret; John W Werning; William M Mendenhall Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-03-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mehdi Taghipour; Esther Mena; Matthew J Kruse; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Rathan M Subramaniam Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: Howard E Morgan; Kai Wang; Michael Dohopolski; Xiao Liang; Michael R Folkert; David J Sher; Jing Wang Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2021-12
Authors: Tobin Strom; Louis B Harrison; Anna R Giuliano; Michael J Schell; Steven A Eschrich; Anders Berglund; William Fulp; Ram Thapa; Domenico Coppola; Sungjune Kim; Jessica Frakes; John Foekens; James J Mulé; Javier F Torres-Roca Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 9.162