Literature DB >> 25444304

Characteristics and kinetics of cervical lymph node regression after radiation therapy for human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma: quantitative image analysis of post-radiotherapy response.

Chad Tang1, Clifton D Fuller1, Adam S Garden1, Musaddiq J Awan1, Rivka R Colen2, William H Morrison1, Steven J Frank1, Beth M Beadle1, Jack Phan1, Erich M Sturgis3, Mark E Zafereo3, Randal S Weber3, David I Rosenthal3, G Brandon Gunn4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: We sought to characterize the pattern of lymph node regression and morphology following definitive radiation therapy (RT) for human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma in patients with disease control.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiographically positive cervical lymph nodes from patients treated with definitive RT for HPV-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma were segmented on initial pre- and subsequent post-RT contrast enhanced CT images. Pre-specified quantitative nodal parameters were calculated. Initial nodal parameter correlates of final nodal size, final nodal volume, and time to <1 cm short-axis diameter were determined.
RESULTS: Sixty-six radiographically positive lymph node were analyzed in 36 patients. Lymph nodes exhibited initial volume decreases with size stabilization at ∼4 months. Fifteen nodes (23%) underwent complete radiographic response (median 6.4 months following RT; range 2.9-25.6 months). On multivariate time-to-event analysis, initial hypodense/fat component, nodal volume, and short-axis diameter exhibited inverse association, while higher HU standard deviation exhibited a positive association, with reaching <1 cm short-axis diameter (all p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed a substantial decrease in nodal volume within the first 1-2 months following RT. These findings support our current nodal imaging paradigm, propose a quantitative methodology, and describe a reference dataset for further validation and comparison studies.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical lymph nodes; HPV; Oropharynx cancer; Quantitative methodology; Radiographic response

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25444304      PMCID: PMC4502963          DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  25 in total

1.  Lymph nodes of patients with regional metastases from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma as a predictor of pathologic outcome: size changes at CT before and after radiation therapy.

Authors:  Hiroya Ojiri; Anthony A Mancuso; William M Mendenhall; Scott P Stringer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  CT-based delineation of lymph node levels and related CTVs in the node-negative neck: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, NCIC,RTOG consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Vincent Grégoire; Peter Levendag; Kian K Ang; Jacques Bernier; Marijel Braaksma; Volker Budach; Cliff Chao; Emmanuel Coche; Jay S Cooper; Guy Cosnard; Avraham Eisbruch; Samy El-Sayed; Bahman Emami; Cai Grau; Marc Hamoir; Nancy Lee; Philippe Maingon; Karin Muller; Hervé Reychler
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Cervical lymph node metastasis: assessment of radiologic criteria.

Authors:  M W van den Brekel; H V Stel; J A Castelijns; J J Nauta; I van der Waal; J Valk; C J Meyer; G B Snow
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Neck surgery in patients with primary oropharyngeal cancer treated by radiotherapy.

Authors:  L J Peters; R S Weber; W H Morrison; R M Byers; A S Garden; H Goepfert
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  Importance of patient examination to clinical quality assurance in head and neck radiation oncology.

Authors:  David I Rosenthal; Joshua A Asper; Jerry L Barker; Adam S Garden; K S Clifford Chao; William H Morrison; Randal S Weber; K Kian Ang
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  CT of cervical lymph node cancer.

Authors:  A A Mancuso; D Maceri; D Rice; W Hanafee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization.

Authors:  Robert L Camp; Marisa Dolled-Filhart; David L Rimm
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Concurrent cetuximab versus platinum-based chemoradiation for the definitive treatment of locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Chad Tang; Cato Chan; Wen Jiang; James D Murphy; Rie von Eyben; A Dimitrios Colevas; Harlan Pinto; Nancy Lee-Enriquez; Christina Kong; Quynh-Thu Le
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.147

9.  Computed tomography of cervical and retropharyngeal lymph nodes: normal anatomy, variants of normal, and applications in staging head and neck cancer. Part II: pathology.

Authors:  A A Mancuso; H R Harnsberger; A S Muraki; M H Stevens
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Postradiotherapy neck dissection for lymph node-positive head and neck cancer: the use of computed tomography to manage the neck.

Authors:  Stanley L Liauw; Anthony A Mancuso; Robert J Amdur; Christopher G Morris; Douglas B Villaret; John W Werning; William M Mendenhall
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  4 in total

1.  Post-treatment 18F-FDG-PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced CT in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparative effectiveness study.

Authors:  Mehdi Taghipour; Esther Mena; Matthew J Kruse; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.690

2.  Exploratory ensemble interpretable model for predicting local failure in head and neck cancer: the additive benefit of CT and intra-treatment cone-beam computed tomography features.

Authors:  Howard E Morgan; Kai Wang; Michael Dohopolski; Xiao Liang; Michael R Folkert; David J Sher; Jing Wang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-12

3.  Tumour radiosensitivity is associated with immune activation in solid tumours.

Authors:  Tobin Strom; Louis B Harrison; Anna R Giuliano; Michael J Schell; Steven A Eschrich; Anders Berglund; William Fulp; Ram Thapa; Domenico Coppola; Sungjune Kim; Jessica Frakes; John Foekens; James J Mulé; Javier F Torres-Roca
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  MRI in head and neck cancer following chemoradiotherapy: what is the optimal delay to demonstrate maximal response?

Authors:  S E J Connor; C Burd; N Sivarasan; V Goh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.315

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.