BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Criteria for detection of persistent nodal metastases in treated oropharyngeal tumors are sensitive but nonspecific, leading to unnecessary nodal dissections. Developing specific imaging criteria for persistent nodal metastases could improve diagnosis while decreasing patient morbidity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with nodal metastases treated by definitive radiation therapy and subsequent nodal dissection were retrospectively evaluated. One hundred thirty-eight patients had pre- and posttherapy contrast-enhanced CTs evaluated by radiologists blinded to the status of pathologically proved hemineck persistent nodal metastases. Composite scoring criteria for CT, combined from individual parameters, were compared with radiologists' opinions, previous multiparameter criteria, and outcome data. RESULTS: New low-attenuation areas and a lack of size change (<20% cross sectional area) were both highly specific for persistent nodal metastases (99%; P = .0004). Extranodal disease on pretherapy imaging was moderately specific (86%; P = .001). The CSC correctly placed 29 patients in a low-risk category compared with 14 by previously reported criteria and radiologist reports. With good second-rater reliability, the CSC cutoff values stratified patients at highest risk of persistent nodal metastases, thereby improving specificity while maintaining sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing pre- and posttherapy examinations improves specificity by discriminating focal findings and size change compared with a single time point. The CSC can categorize the risk of persistent nodal metastases more accurately than previous CT methods. This finding has the potential to improve resource use and reduce surgical morbidity.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Criteria for detection of persistent nodal metastases in treated oropharyngeal tumors are sensitive but nonspecific, leading to unnecessary nodal dissections. Developing specific imaging criteria for persistent nodal metastases could improve diagnosis while decreasing patient morbidity. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with nodal metastases treated by definitive radiation therapy and subsequent nodal dissection were retrospectively evaluated. One hundred thirty-eight patients had pre- and posttherapy contrast-enhanced CTs evaluated by radiologists blinded to the status of pathologically proved hemineck persistent nodal metastases. Composite scoring criteria for CT, combined from individual parameters, were compared with radiologists' opinions, previous multiparameter criteria, and outcome data. RESULTS: New low-attenuation areas and a lack of size change (<20% cross sectional area) were both highly specific for persistent nodal metastases (99%; P = .0004). Extranodal disease on pretherapy imaging was moderately specific (86%; P = .001). The CSC correctly placed 29 patients in a low-risk category compared with 14 by previously reported criteria and radiologist reports. With good second-rater reliability, the CSC cutoff values stratified patients at highest risk of persistent nodal metastases, thereby improving specificity while maintaining sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing pre- and posttherapy examinations improves specificity by discriminating focal findings and size change compared with a single time point. The CSC can categorize the risk of persistent nodal metastases more accurately than previous CT methods. This finding has the potential to improve resource use and reduce surgical morbidity.
Authors: Hiroya Ojiri; Anthony A Mancuso; William M Mendenhall; Scott P Stringer Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2002 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: William M Mendenhall; Christopher G Morris; Robert J Amdur; Russell W Hinerman; John W Werning; Douglas B Villaret Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: T S Boyd; P M Harari; S P Tannehill; M C Voytovich; G K Hartig; C N Ford; R L Foote; B H Campbell; C J Schultz Journal: Head Neck Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: R J Wong; D T Lin; H Schöder; S G Patel; M Gonen; S Wolden; D G Pfister; J P Shah; S M Larson; D H Kraus Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-10-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hiroya Ojiri; William M Mendenhall; Scott P Stringer; Patches L Johnson; Anthony A Mancuso Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Ilana Doweck; K Thomas Robbins; William M Mendenhall; Russell W Hinerman; Christopher Morris; Robert Amdur Journal: Head Neck Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: John W Rogers; Kathryn M Greven; W Frederick McGuirt; John W Keyes; Dan W Williams; Nat E Watson; Kim Geisinger; James O Cappellari Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Mehdi Taghipour; Esther Mena; Matthew J Kruse; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Rathan M Subramaniam Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: Chad Tang; Clifton D Fuller; Adam S Garden; Musaddiq J Awan; Rivka R Colen; William H Morrison; Steven J Frank; Beth M Beadle; Jack Phan; Erich M Sturgis; Mark E Zafereo; Randal S Weber; David I Rosenthal; G Brandon Gunn Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 5.337