Literature DB >> 18185903

The role of preoperative urodynamic testing in stress-continent women undergoing sacrocolpopexy: the Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE) randomized surgical trial.

Anthony G Visco1, Linda Brubaker, Ingrid Nygaard, Holly E Richter, Geoffrey Cundiff, Paul Fine, Halina Zyczynski, Morton B Brown, Anne M Weber.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to describe results of reduction testing in stress-continent women undergoing sacrocolpopexy and to estimate whether stress leakage during urodynamic testing with prolapse reduction predicts postoperative stress incontinence. Three hundred twenty-two stress-continent women with stages II-IV prolapse underwent standardized urodynamics. Five prolapse reduction methods were tested: two at each site and both performed for each subject. Clinicians were masked to urodynamic results. At sacrocolpopexy, participants were randomized to Burch colposuspension or no Burch (control). P-values were computed by two-tailed Fisher's exact test or t-test. Preoperatively, only 12 of 313 (3.7%) subjects demonstrated urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) without prolapse reduction. More women leaked after the second method than after the first (22% vs. 16%; p = 0.012). Preoperative detection of USI with prolapse reduction at 300ml was pessary, 6% (5 of 88); manual, 16% (19 of 122); forceps, 21% (21 of 98); swab, 20% (32 of 158); and speculum, 30% (35 of 118). Women who demonstrated preoperative USI during prolapse reduction were more likely to report postoperative stress incontinence, regardless of concomitant colposuspension (controls 58% vs. 38% (p = 0.04) and Burch 32% vs. 21% (p = 0.19)). In stress-continent women undergoing sacrocolpopexy, few women demonstrated USI without prolapse reduction. Detection rates of USI with prolapse reduction varied significantly by reduction method. Preoperative USI leakage during reduction testing is associated with a higher risk for postoperative stress incontinence at 3 months. Future research is warranted in this patient population to evaluate other treatment options to refine predictions and further reduce the risk of postoperative stress incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18185903      PMCID: PMC2597273          DOI: 10.1007/s00192-007-0498-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  24 in total

1.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Predicting postoperative urinary incontinence development in women undergoing operation for genitourinary prolapse.

Authors:  A Bergman; P P Koonings; C A Ballard
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  The incidence of low-pressure urethra as a function of prolapse-reducing technique in patients with massive pelvic organ prolapse (maximum descent at all vaginal sites).

Authors:  D K Veronikis; D H Nichols; M M Wakamatsu
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Randomized prospective comparison of needle colposuspension versus endopelvic fascia plication for potential stress incontinence prophylaxis in women undergoing vaginal reconstruction for stage III or IV pelvic organ prolapse. The Continence Program for Women Research Group.

Authors:  R C Bump; W G Hurt; J P Theofrastous; W A Addison; J A Fantl; J F Wyman; D K McClish
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Prevalence of abnormal urodynamic test results in continent women with severe genitourinary prolapse.

Authors:  B A Rosenzweig; S Pushkin; D Blumenfeld; N N Bhatia
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Urodynamic effects of a vaginal pessary in women with stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  N N Bhatia; A Bergman; J E Gunning
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-12-15       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Prevalence of urinary incontinence and other urological symptoms in the noninstitutionalized elderly.

Authors:  A C Diokno; B M Brock; M B Brown; A R Herzog
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The mechanism of urinary continence in women with severe uterovaginal prolapse: results of barrier studies.

Authors:  R C Bump; J A Fantl; W G Hurt
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Prevention of exercise incontinence with mechanical devices.

Authors:  I Nygaard
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 0.142

10.  Urodynamic characteristics of women with complete posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  L L Wall; J K Hewitt
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  49 in total

1.  Preoperative clinical, demographic, and urodynamic measures associated with failure to demonstrate urodynamic stress incontinence in women enrolled in two randomized clinical trials of surgery for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Gary E Lemack; Heather J Litman; Charles Nager; Linda Brubaker; Jerry Lowder; Peggy Norton; Larry Sirls; Keith Lloyd; John W Kusek
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Pelvic organ prolapse surgery and bladder function.

Authors:  Kaven Baessler; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review.

Authors:  Christopher M Maher; Benny Feiner; Kaven Baessler; Cathryn M A Glazener
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Prolapse reduction deteriorates the urethral closure mechanism.

Authors:  Zi-Xi Loo; Kun-Ling Lin; Cheng-Yu Long
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  The value of the preoperative 1-h pad test with pessary insertion for predicting the need for a mid-urethral sling following pelvic prolapse surgery: a cohort study.

Authors:  Xiaochen Song; Lan Zhu; Jing Ding
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  The negative predictive value of preoperative urodynamics for stress urinary incontinence following prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Tania Sierra; Gina Sullivan; Katherine Leung; Michael Flynn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Two-year urinary outcomes of sacrocolpopexy with or without transobturator tape: results of a prolapse-reduction stress test-based approach.

Authors:  Myung Jae Jeon; Ji Young Kim; Yeo Jung Moon; Sang Wook Bai; Eun-Hee Yoo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  Incidence and Management of De Novo Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair.

Authors:  Henry Tran; Doreen E Chung
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Functional Outcomes for Incontinence and Prolapse Surgery.

Authors:  Saya Segal; Lily A Arya; Ariana L Smith
Journal:  Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep       Date:  2012-09

10.  A long-term treatment outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Myung Jae Jeon; Yeo Jung Moon; Hyun Joo Jung; Kyung Jin Lim; Hyo In Yang; Sei Kwang Kim; Sang Wook Bai
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.