Literature DB >> 22669421

Preoperative clinical, demographic, and urodynamic measures associated with failure to demonstrate urodynamic stress incontinence in women enrolled in two randomized clinical trials of surgery for stress urinary incontinence.

Gary E Lemack1, Heather J Litman, Charles Nager, Linda Brubaker, Jerry Lowder, Peggy Norton, Larry Sirls, Keith Lloyd, John W Kusek.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The unexpected absence of urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) in women planning surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a challenge to surgeons. We examined the prevalence and clinical and demographic factors associated at baseline (preoperatively) with the unexpected absence of USI among study participants of two multicenter randomized clinical trials of surgery for treating SUI.
METHODS: Women with SUI symptoms and positive stress tests on physical examination enrolled in two separate clinical trials-one comparing the autologous fascial sling with the Burch colposuspension [Stress Incontinence Surgical Treatment Efficacy Trial (SISTEr), and the other comparing the retropubic mid-urethral sling with the transobturator midurethral sling [Trial of Mid-Urethral Slings (TOMUS)]-were evaluated for USI preoperatively. The association of clinical, demographic, and urodynamic parameters was examined in women without USI in univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: Overall, 144 of 1,233 women (11.7 %) enrolled in the two studies showed no USI. These women had a significantly lower mean volume at maximum cystometric capacity than those with USI (347.5 vs. 395.8 in SISTEr, p = 0.012), (315.2 vs. 358.2 in TOMUS, p = 0.003) and a lower mean number of daily accidents reported on a 3-day diary (2.2 vs 2.7 in SISTEr, p = 0.030) (1.7 vs 2.7 in TOMUS, p < 0.001). Additionally, those without demonstrable USI were more likely to have Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stage III/IV (31.7 % vs 14.4 % in SISTEr, p = 0.002), (15.5 % vs 6.9 % in TOMUS, p = 0.025). SUI severity as recorded on the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI) correlated strongly with the presence of USI in both studies.
CONCLUSIONS: We observed that about one of eight women planning surgery for SUI does not show USI. Stage 3/4 POP was strongly associated with the unexpected absence of USI. A diminished urodynamic bladder capacity among women who did not display USI may reflect an inability to reach the limits of capacity during urodynamics, at which these women normally leak.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22669421      PMCID: PMC4169424          DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1821-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  11 in total

1.  Urodynamic prolapse reduction alters urethral pressure but not filling or pressure flow parameters.

Authors:  E R Mueller; K Kenton; S Mahajan; M P FitzGerald; L Brubaker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence.

Authors:  Holly E Richter; Michael E Albo; Halina M Zyczynski; Kimberly Kenton; Peggy A Norton; Larry T Sirls; Stephen R Kraus; Toby C Chai; Gary E Lemack; Kimberly J Dandreo; R Edward Varner; Shawn Menefee; Chiara Ghetti; Linda Brubaker; Ingrid Nygaard; Salil Khandwala; Thomas A Rozanski; Harry Johnson; Joseph Schaffer; Anne M Stoddard; Robert L Holley; Charles W Nager; Pamela Moalli; Elizabeth Mueller; Amy M Arisco; Marlene Corton; Sharon Tennstedt; T Debuene Chang; E Ann Gormley; Heather J Litman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Baseline urodynamic predictors of treatment failure 1 year after mid urethral sling surgery.

Authors:  Charles W Nager; Larry Sirls; Heather J Litman; Holly Richter; Ingrid Nygaard; Toby Chai; Stephen Kraus; Halina Zyczynski; Kim Kenton; Liyuan Huang; John Kusek; Gary Lemack
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Effect of 6F urethral catheterization on urinary flow rates during repeated pressure-flow studies in healthy female volunteers.

Authors:  Adam G Baseman; Janet G Baseman; Philippe E Zimmern; Gary E Lemack
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Which women with stress incontinence require urodynamic evaluation?

Authors:  A C Weidner; E R Myers; A G Visco; G W Cundiff; R C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Design of the Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (ValUE) trial: A non-inferiority randomized trial of preoperative urodynamic investigations.

Authors:  Charles W Nager; Linda Brubaker; Firouz Daneshgari; Heather J Litman; Kimberly J Dandreo; Larry Sirls; Gary E Lemack; Holly E Richter; Wendy Leng; Peggy Norton; Stephen R Kraus; Toby C Chai; Debuene Chang; Cindy L Amundsen; Anne M Stoddard; Sharon L Tennstedt
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence.

Authors:  Michael E Albo; Holly E Richter; Linda Brubaker; Peggy Norton; Stephen R Kraus; Philippe E Zimmern; Toby C Chai; Halina Zyczynski; Ananias C Diokno; Sharon Tennstedt; Charles Nager; L Keith Lloyd; MaryPat FitzGerald; Gary E Lemack; Harry W Johnson; Wendy Leng; Veronica Mallett; Anne M Stoddard; Shawn Menefee; R Edward Varner; Kimberly Kenton; Pam Moalli; Larry Sirls; Kimberly J Dandreo; John W Kusek; Leroy M Nyberg; William Steers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The mechanism of urinary continence in women with severe uterovaginal prolapse: results of barrier studies.

Authors:  R C Bump; J A Fantl; W G Hurt
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  The role of preoperative urodynamic testing in stress-continent women undergoing sacrocolpopexy: the Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE) randomized surgical trial.

Authors:  Anthony G Visco; Linda Brubaker; Ingrid Nygaard; Holly E Richter; Geoffrey Cundiff; Paul Fine; Halina Zyczynski; Morton B Brown; Anne M Weber
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-01-09

10.  Reliability testing of urodynamics, pressure flow studies and cough leak point pressure in women with urodynamic stress incontinence with and without detrusor overactivity.

Authors:  Philip Rahmanou; Charlotte Chaliha; Elena Kulinskaya; Vik Khullar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-02-05
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Abigail A Ford; Lynne Rogerson; June D Cody; Patricia Aluko; Joseph A Ogah
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-31

2.  Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Lucky Saraswat; Haroon Rehman; Muhammad Imran Omar; June D Cody; Patricia Aluko; Cathryn Ma Glazener
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-28

3.  Comparative Assessment of Female Sexual Function Following Transobturator Midurethral Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence.

Authors:  Maciej Zalewski; Gabriela Kołodyńska; Agata Zalewska; Waldemar Andrzejewski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  False-negative finding in urodynamic study for the chief complaint. Does it interfere with the clinical outcomes for the treatment of SUI or OAB syndromes?

Authors:  Paulo Rodrigues; Flávio Hering; Eli Cielici; Marcio D Império
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.