Literature DB >> 18183454

Comparison of the cecal microbiota of domestic and wild turkeys.

Alexandra J Scupham1, Toni G Patton, Elizabeth Bent, Darrell O Bayles.   

Abstract

The extent to which production methods alter intestinal microbial communities of livestock is currently unknown. As the intestinal microbiota may affect animal health, nutrition, and food safety, a baseline comparison of the cecal communities of domestic and wild turkeys was performed. Oligonucleotide fingerprinting of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes (OFRG) of 2,990 16S rRNA clones and dot blot quantification of dominant populations were used to identify the dominant bacterial taxa. Seventy-three percent of all the clones belonged to as yet uncultured genera. However, at a higher phylogenetic level, the OFRG library was composed of 54% Bacteroidetes clones (52% of the domestic library clones, 56% of the wild library clones), 30% Firmicutes clones (33% of the domestic library clones, 32% of the wild library clones), 3% Proteobacteria clones (5% domestic, 2% wild), and 3% Deferribacteres clones (4% domestic, 1% wild). Seven percent of the clones were unidentifiable (6% domestic, 9% wild). Bacteroidetes clones included the genera Alistipes, Prevotella, Megamonas, and Bacteroides. Of the Clostridiales clones, groups IV, IX, and XIV including genera Faecalibacterium, Megasphaera, Phascolarctobacterium, and Papillibacter were predominant. Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, and Streptococcus bacilli were also identified. beta- delta- and gamma-proteobacterial genera included Acinetobacter, Sutterella, and Escherichia. Deferribacteres clones showed high similarity to Mucispirillum schaedleri. Statistical comparison of the domestic and wild turkey clone libraries indicated similar levels of community richness and evenness despite the fact that the two libraries shared only 30% of the total clone operational taxonomic units. Together these results indicate that although high level taxonomic community structure is similar, high-density turkey production causes considerable divergence of the genera found in the ceca of commercial birds from those of their wild counterparts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18183454     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-007-9349-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  46 in total

1.  Influence of intensive and extensive breeding on lactic acid bacteria isolated from Gallus gallus domesticus ceca.

Authors:  Marcelo R Souza; João L Moreira; Flávio H F Barbosa; Mônica M O P Cerqueira; Alvaro C Nunes; Jacques R Nicoli
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 3.293

2.  Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids.

Authors:  R Boom; C J Sol; M M Salimans; C L Jansen; P M Wertheim-van Dillen; J van der Noordaa
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Recent developments in the thermophilic microbiology of deep-sea hydrothermal vents.

Authors:  Margarita L Miroshnichenko; Elizaveta A Bonch-Osmolovskaya
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Differences between tissue-associated intestinal microfloras of patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Uri Gophna; Katrin Sommerfeld; Sharon Gophna; W Ford Doolittle; Sander J O Veldhuyzen van Zanten
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Intestinal bacteria and ageing.

Authors:  E J Woodmansey
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.772

6.  pH and peptide supply can radically alter bacterial populations and short-chain fatty acid ratios within microbial communities from the human colon.

Authors:  Alan W Walker; Sylvia H Duncan; E Carol McWilliam Leitch; Matthew W Child; Harry J Flint
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  The intestinal microflora of poultry and game birds during life and after storage. Address of the president of the Society for Applied Bacteriology delivered at a meeting of the society on 10 January 1979.

Authors:  E M Barnes
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1979-06

8.  Factors affecting the incidence and anti-salmonella activity of the anaerobic caecal flora of the young chick.

Authors:  E M Barnes; C S Impey; B J Stevens
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1979-04

9.  Classification of oligonucleotide fingerprints: application for microbial community and gene expression analyses.

Authors:  Katechan Jampachaisri; Lea Valinsky; James Borneman; S James Press
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  At least 1 in 20 16S rRNA sequence records currently held in public repositories is estimated to contain substantial anomalies.

Authors:  Kevin E Ashelford; Nadia A Chuzhanova; John C Fry; Antonia J Jones; Andrew J Weightman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  47 in total

1.  Comparative analyses of foregut and hindgut bacterial communities in hoatzins and cows.

Authors:  Filipa Godoy-Vitorino; Katherine C Goldfarb; Ulas Karaoz; Sara Leal; Maria A Garcia-Amado; Philip Hugenholtz; Susannah G Tringe; Eoin L Brodie; Maria Gloria Dominguez-Bello
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 2.  Diversity and function of the avian gut microbiota.

Authors:  Kevin D Kohl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Effect of dietary prebiotic (mannan oligosaccharide) supplementation on the caecal bacterial community structure of turkeys.

Authors:  A Corrigan; K Horgan; N Clipson; R A Murphy
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Evidence for a core gut microbiota in the zebrafish.

Authors:  Guus Roeselers; Erika K Mittge; W Zac Stephens; David M Parichy; Colleen M Cavanaugh; Karen Guillemin; John F Rawls
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  A Non-invasive Method to Collect Fecal Samples from Wild Birds for Microbiome Studies.

Authors:  Sarah A Knutie; Kiyoko M Gotanda
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Antibiotic manipulation of intestinal microbiota to identify microbes associated with Campylobacter jejuni exclusion in poultry.

Authors:  A J Scupham; J A Jones; E A Rettedal; T E Weber
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Reduction in fecal microbiota diversity and short-chain fatty acid producers in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infected individuals as revealed by PacBio single molecule, real-time sequencing technology.

Authors:  J Zhao; L Nian; L Y Kwok; T Sun; J Zhao
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Characterization of coastal urban watershed bacterial communities leads to alternative community-based indicators.

Authors:  Cindy H Wu; Bram Sercu; Laurie C Van de Werfhorst; Jakk Wong; Todd Z DeSantis; Eoin L Brodie; Terry C Hazen; Patricia A Holden; Gary L Andersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Bacterial community in the crop of the hoatzin, a neotropical folivorous flying bird.

Authors:  Filipa Godoy-Vitorino; Ruth E Ley; Zhan Gao; Zhiheng Pei; Humberto Ortiz-Zuazaga; Luis R Pericchi; Maria A Garcia-Amado; Fabian Michelangeli; Martin J Blaser; Jeffrey I Gordon; Maria G Domínguez-Bello
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Spatial dynamics of the bacterial community structure in the gastrointestinal tract of red kangaroo (Macropus rufus).

Authors:  Meirong Li; Wei Jin; Yuanfei Li; Lingling Zhao; Yanfen Cheng; Weiyun Zhu
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.