Literature DB >> 17113730

Influence of intensive and extensive breeding on lactic acid bacteria isolated from Gallus gallus domesticus ceca.

Marcelo R Souza1, João L Moreira, Flávio H F Barbosa, Mônica M O P Cerqueira, Alvaro C Nunes, Jacques R Nicoli.   

Abstract

In the present study, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) from the cecum of chickens bred either under intensive (commercial broilers) or extensive (free-range) conditions were isolated, identified and some of their probiotic characteristics determined. The LAB identified by 16S-23S rRNA PCR-ARDRA were mainly of Lactobacillus species and to a lesser extent of Enterococcus spp. for all animals. Free-range chickens showed a higher presence of Lactobacillus acidophilus while Lactobacillus reuteri and Lactobacillus johnsonii were more frequently recovered from commercial broilers. Lactobacillus crispatus was found only in commercial broilers, Lactobacillus vaginalis and Lactobacillus agilis only in free-range chickens and Lactobacillus salivarius in both types. Enterococcus isolates from ceca of commercial broilers showed a higher resistance to antimicrobial drugs. Lactobacillus isolates from free-range chickens presented a higher frequency of in vitro antagonistic activity against selected pathogens than from commercial broilers. All LAB isolates had predominantly non-hydrophobic surfaces, but with variations depending on age of the chickens and breeding conditions. Animal breeding caused variation on composition, antimicrobial susceptibility, antagonistic activity and surface hydrophobicity of LAB from chicken cecum. LAB isolates from ceca of free-range chickens have potential as probiotic agents, which may be used in the future as replacing the use of antimicrobials as growth promoters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17113730     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  7 in total

1.  Effect of dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL (CECT 4529) on caecum microbioma and productive performance in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Alessandra De Cesare; Federico Sirri; Gerardo Manfreda; Paola Moniaci; Alberto Giardini; Marco Zampiga; Adele Meluzzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Screening for probiotic properties of strains isolated from feces of various human groups.

Authors:  Sathyaseelan Sathyabama; Rajendran Vijayabharathi; Palanisamy Bruntha Devi; Manohar Ranjith Kumar; Venkatesan Brindha Priyadarisini
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 3.422

3.  Comparison and utilization of repetitive-element PCR techniques for typing Lactobacillus isolates from the chicken gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  David P Stephenson; Robert J Moore; Gwen E Allison
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Comparison of the cecal microbiota of domestic and wild turkeys.

Authors:  Alexandra J Scupham; Toni G Patton; Elizabeth Bent; Darrell O Bayles
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Draft Genome Sequence of Lactobacillus crispatus C25 Isolated from Chicken Cecum.

Authors:  Morvarid Rezvani; Mary Mendoza; Matthew D Koci; Caitlyn Daron; Josh Levy; Hosni M Hassan
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2016-11-03

6.  Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements.

Authors:  A P V Cassenego; P A d'Azevedo; A M L Ribeiro; J Frazzon; S T Van Der Sand; A P G Frazzon
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.476

7.  Increased Microbial Diversity and Decreased Prevalence of Common Pathogens in the Gut Microbiomes of Wild Turkeys Compared to Domestic Turkeys.

Authors:  Julia Craft; Hyrum Eddington; Nicholas D Christman; Weston Pryor; John M Chaston; David L Erickson; Eric Wilson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.792

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.