Literature DB >> 21938024

Comparative analyses of foregut and hindgut bacterial communities in hoatzins and cows.

Filipa Godoy-Vitorino1, Katherine C Goldfarb, Ulas Karaoz, Sara Leal, Maria A Garcia-Amado, Philip Hugenholtz, Susannah G Tringe, Eoin L Brodie, Maria Gloria Dominguez-Bello.   

Abstract

Foregut fermentation occurs in mammalian ruminants and in one bird, the South American folivorous hoatzin. This bird has an enlarged crop with a function analogous to the rumen, where foregut microbes degrade the otherwise indigestible plant matter, providing energy to the host from foregut fermentation, in addition to the fermentation that occurs in their hindguts (cecum/colon). As foregut fermentation represents an evolutionary convergence between hoatzins and ruminants, our aim was to compare the community structure of foregut and hindgut bacterial communities in the cow and hoatzin to evaluate the influences of host phylogeny and organ function in shaping the gut microbiome. The approach used was to hybridize amplified bacterial ribosomal RNA genes onto a high-density microarray (PhyloChip). The results show that the microbial communities cluster primarily by functional environment (foreguts cluster separately from hindguts) and then by host. Bacterial community diversity was higher in the cow than in the hoatzin. Overall, compared with hindguts, foreguts have higher proportions of Bacteroidetes and Spirochaetes, and lower proportions of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. The main host differences in gut bacterial composition include a higher representation of Spirochaetes, Synergistetes and Verrucomicrobia in the cow. Despite the significant differences in host phylogeny, body size, physiology and diet, the function seems to shape the microbial communities involved in fermentation. Regardless of the independent origin of foregut fermentation in birds and mammals, organ function has led to convergence of the microbial community structure in phylogenetically distant hosts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21938024      PMCID: PMC3280141          DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2011.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISME J        ISSN: 1751-7362            Impact factor:   10.302


  35 in total

Review 1.  Factors that alter rumen microbial ecology.

Authors:  J B Russell; J L Rychlik
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-05-11       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Contributions of microbes in vertebrate gastrointestinal tract to production and conservation of nutrients.

Authors:  C E Stevens; I D Hume
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Enumeration of anaerobic bacterial microflora of the equine gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  R I Mackie; C A Wilkins
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Developmental microbial ecology of the crop of the folivorous hoatzin.

Authors:  Filipa Godoy-Vitorino; Katherine C Goldfarb; Eoin L Brodie; Maria A Garcia-Amado; Fabian Michelangeli; Maria G Domínguez-Bello
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Acetone and isopropanol in ruminal fluid and feces of lactating dairy cows.

Authors:  Hiroshi Sato; Yumiko Shiogama
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 1.267

6.  Regional mucosa-associated microbiota determine physiological expression of TLR2 and TLR4 in murine colon.

Authors:  Yunwei Wang; Suzanne Devkota; Mark W Musch; Bana Jabri; Cathryn Nagler; Dionysios A Antonopoulos; Alexander Chervonsky; Eugene B Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns.

Authors:  M B Eisen; P T Spellman; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Costello; Christian L Lauber; Micah Hamady; Noah Fierer; Jeffrey I Gordon; Rob Knight
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  High-density universal 16S rRNA microarray analysis reveals broader diversity than typical clone library when sampling the environment.

Authors:  Todd Z DeSantis; Eoin L Brodie; Jordan P Moberg; Ingrid X Zubieta; Yvette M Piceno; Gary L Andersen
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 4.192

10.  Fast UniFrac: facilitating high-throughput phylogenetic analyses of microbial communities including analysis of pyrosequencing and PhyloChip data.

Authors:  Micah Hamady; Catherine Lozupone; Rob Knight
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 10.302

View more
  69 in total

1.  Impact of subacute ruminal acidosis on the diversity of liquid and solid-associated bacteria in the rumen of goats.

Authors:  Wenjie Huo; Weiyun Zhu; Shengyong Mao
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Characterization of the cellulolytic bacteria communities along the gastrointestinal tract of Chinese Mongolian sheep by using PCR-DGGE and real-time PCR analysis.

Authors:  Yan Zeng; Dong Zeng; Yan Zhang; Xueqin Ni; Yurui Tang; Hui Zhu; Hesong Wang; Zhongqiong Yin; Kangcheng Pan; Bo Jing
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 3.  Convergent evolution of signal-structure interfaces for maintaining symbioses.

Authors:  Reed M Stubbendieck; Hongjie Li; Cameron R Currie
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 7.934

4.  Spatiotemporal analysis of bacterial diversity in sediments of Sundarbans using parallel 16S rRNA gene tag sequencing.

Authors:  Pijush Basak; Niladri Shekhar Majumder; Sudip Nag; Anish Bhattacharyya; Debojyoti Roy; Arpita Chakraborty; Sohan SenGupta; Arunava Roy; Arghya Mukherjee; Rudradip Pattanayak; Abhrajyoti Ghosh; Dhrubajyoti Chattopadhyay; Maitree Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Comparative study of the bacterial communities throughout the gastrointestinal tract in two beef cattle breeds.

Authors:  Yixiao Zhu; Zhisheng Wang; Rui Hu; Xueying Wang; Fengpeng Li; Xiangfei Zhang; Huawei Zou; Quanhui Peng; Bai Xue; Lizhi Wang
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Calling all hosts: Bacterial communication in situ.

Authors:  Jessica L Cleary; Alanna R Condren; Katherine E Zink; Laura M Sanchez
Journal:  Chem       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 22.804

7.  Newly cultured bacteria with broad diversity isolated from eight-week continuous culture enrichments of cow feces on complex polysaccharides.

Authors:  Cherie J Ziemer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Analysis of the Gut Microbial Diversity of Dairy Cows During Peak Lactation by PacBio Single-Molecule Real-Time (SMRT) Sequencing.

Authors:  Weicheng Li; Qiangchuan Hou; Yanjie Wang; Huimin Ma; Yahua Liu; Feiyan Zhao; Jing Li; Lai-Yu Kwok; Jie Yu; Zhihong Sun; Tiansong Sun
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.188

9.  Comparative effects of two multispecies direct-fed microbial products on energy status, nutrient digestibility, and ruminal fermentation, bacterial community, and metabolome of beef steers.

Authors:  Ibukun M Ogunade; Megan McCoun; Modoluwamu D Idowu; Sunday O Peters
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Influence of hand rearing and bird age on the fecal microbiota of the critically endangered kakapo.

Authors:  David W Waite; Daryl K Eason; Michael W Taylor
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.