Literature DB >> 18178912

Validation of the NITI Endoluminal Compression Anastomosis Ring (EndoCAR) device and comparison to the traditional circular stapled colorectal anastomosis in a porcine model.

David Stewart1, Steven Hunt, Richard Pierce, Margaret Frisella, Kathryn Cook, Barry Starcher, James Fleshman.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the characteristics of compression anastomoses created by a new device are comparable to existing stapler technology. A total of 18 pigs were studied, and each served as its own control using a 27-mm compression device and a 29-mm stapler. Anastomoses were randomized to proximal and distal positions along the rectum and were separated by 10 cm. Six nonsurvival pigs were sacrificed at zero time to failure test the anastomoses. Twelve pigs were sacrificed at 14 days. Failure pressures, circumferences, and radiographic leak rates were determined. Anastomotic tissue was processed for matrix metalloproteinase, collagen, and elastin levels. The compression anastomoses had higher mean failure pressures than stapled anastomoses at zero time (103 vs 29.9 mm Hg). At 2 weeks, there was no difference between failure pressures (256 vs 250 mm Hg). During burst testing, 3 of the compression anastomoses failed at the anastomosis at 2 weeks, whereas none of the stapled anastomoses failed. The mean anastomotic circumference of the compression anastomoses was narrower than the stapled anastomoses (9.63 vs 11.25 cm, P = .001). There were no clinical leaks or radiographic leaks by barium enema at 2 weeks. There was no difference between matrix metalloproteinase, collagen, or elastin content based on tissue analysis. There were dense adhesions to 7 of 12 (58.3%) of the stapled anastomoses, whereas only 1 of 12 (8.3%) of the compression anastomoses had flimsy adhesions. A new compression anastomosis technique using a nickel-titanium alloy may be an advance in technology by reducing leaks and eliminating foreign material in the anastomosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18178912     DOI: 10.1177/1553350607312241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Innov        ISSN: 1553-3506            Impact factor:   2.058


  15 in total

1.  Early experience of the compression anastomosis ring (CAR™ 27) in left-sided colon resection.

Authors:  Jung-Yeon Lee; Jin-Hee Woo; Hong-Jo Choi; Ki-Jae Park; Young-Hoon Roh; Ki-Han Kim; Hak-Yoon Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Compression anastomoses in colorectal surgery: a review.

Authors:  A P Zbar; Y Nir; A Weizman; M Rabau; A Senagore
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Techniques for colorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  Yik Hong Ho; Mohamed Ahmed Tawfik Ashour
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  A systematic analysis of controlled clinical trials using the NiTi CAR™ compression ring in colorectal anastomoses.

Authors:  R Tabola; R Cirocchi; A Fingerhut; A Arezzo; J Randolph; V Grassi; G A Binda; V D'Andrea; I Abraha; G Popivanov; S Di Saverio; A Zbar
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  James Walter Fleshman Jr., MD: a conversation with the editor.

Authors:  James W Fleshman; William C Roberts
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2014-07

6.  Compression anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery with the NiTi ColonRing™.

Authors:  C Avgoustou; P Penlidis; A Tsakpini; C Sioros; D Giannousis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Anastomosis by use of compression anastomosis ring (CAR™ 27) in laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colonic tumor.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Koo; Hong-Jo Choi; Jin-Hee Woo; Ki-Jae Park; Young-Hoon Roh; Ki-Han Kim; Hak-Yoon Lee
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Evaluation of the NiTi Shape Memory BioDynamix ColonRing™ in colorectal anastomosis: first in human multi-center study.

Authors:  Hagit Tulchinsky; Hanoch Kashtan; Micha Rabau; Nir Wasserberg
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Anastomoses of the lower gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Govind Nandakumar; Sharon L Stein; Fabrizio Michelassi
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 10.  Do we really know why colorectal anastomoses leak?

Authors:  Benjamin D Shogan; Erica M Carlisle; John C Alverdy; Konstantin Umanskiy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.