Literature DB >> 18175802

Comparison of the premier toxin A and B assay and the TOX A/B II assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Susan M Novak-Weekley1, Michele H Hollingsworth.   

Abstract

Clostridium difficile causes nosocomial diarrhea and is responsible for complications such as pseudomembranous colitis, megacolon, and perforation. Using 442 stool specimens, we compared the sensitivities and specificities of the Premier toxin A and B (Meridian Bioscience, Inc.) and C. difficile TOX A/B II (TechLab, Inc., Blacksburg, VA) immunoassays in the Virology Department of the Kaiser Permanente Regional Reference Laboratories. The Premier toxin A and B assay demonstrated a higher sensitivity (97.44%) and a higher positive predictive value (79.17%) than the C. difficile TOX A/B II assay (87.18% and 75.56%, respectively), while assay specificities and negative predictive values were similar. We also performed experiments using serially diluted, purified toxin A and B antigens to understand the basis for assay differences. The two assays' toxin A antibodies detected toxin A at comparable levels. Preliminary results indicated that the toxin B antibody in the Premier toxin A and B assay could detect toxin B at a concentration of 125 pg/100 microl, while the toxin B antibody in the C. difficile TOX A/B II assay could not detect toxin B below a concentration of 250 pg/100 microl. Therefore, the Premier toxin A and B assay provides greater sensitivity than the C. difficile TOX A/B II assay, perhaps due to a superior detection ability of its toxin B antibody.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18175802      PMCID: PMC2268262          DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00282-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol        ISSN: 1556-679X


  18 in total

Review 1.  Clostridium difficile testing: after 20 years, still challenging.

Authors:  Tracy D Wilkins; David M Lyerly
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of methods for detection of toxins in specimens of feces submitted for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  D O'Connor; P Hynes; M Cormican; E Collins; G Corbett-Feeney; M Cassidy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Prevalence and genetic characterization of toxin A variant strains of Clostridium difficile among adults and children with diarrhea in France.

Authors:  Frédéric Barbut; Valérie Lalande; Béatrice Burghoffer; Huong Vu Thien; Emmanuel Grimprel; Jean-Claude Petit
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  The role of Clostridium difficile in childhood nosocomial diarrhea.

Authors:  F Oğuz; G Uysal; S Daşdemir; H Oskovi; S Vidinlisan
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  2001

Review 5.  Clostridium difficile--Associated diarrhea: A review.

Authors:  E Mylonakis; E T Ryan; S B Calderwood
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-02-26

6.  Fatal pseudomembranous colitis associated with a variant clostridium difficile strain not detected by toxin A immunoassay.

Authors:  S Johnson; S A Kent; K J O'Leary; M M Merrigan; S P Sambol; L R Peterson; D N Gerding
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Failure of single-toxin assays to detect clostridium difficile infection in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  J E Markowitz; K A Brown; P Mamula; H R Drott; D A Piccoli; R N Baldassano
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 8.  Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  C P Kelly; J T LaMont
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 13.739

9.  Health care costs and mortality associated with nosocomial diarrhea due to Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Lorraine Kyne; Mary Beth Hamel; Rajashekhar Polavaram; Ciarán P Kelly
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-12-17       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Detection of toxin production in Clostridium difficile strains by three different methods.

Authors:  M Yücesoy; J McCoubrey; R Brown; I R Poxton
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.067

View more
  7 in total

1.  C. Diff Quik Chek complete enzyme immunoassay provides a reliable first-line method for detection of Clostridium difficile in stool specimens.

Authors:  Criziel D Quinn; Susan E Sefers; Wisal Babiker; Ying He; Romina Alcabasa; Charles W Stratton; Karen C Carroll; Yi-Wei Tang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis Should Be Screened for Clostridium difficile Colitis.

Authors:  Sammy Saab; Theodore Alper; Ernesto Sernas; Paridhima Pruthi; Mikhail A Alper; Vinay Sundaram
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.

Authors:  Susan M Novak-Weekley; Elizabeth M Marlowe; John M Miller; Joven Cumpio; Jim H Nomura; Paula H Vance; Alice Weissfeld
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of a commercial multiplex real-time PCR to the cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay for diagnosis of clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Haihui Huang; Andrej Weintraub; Hong Fang; Carl Erik Nord
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  False-Positive Clostridium difficile in Negative-Control Reactions Peak and Then Decrease with Repetitive Refrigeration of Immunoassay.

Authors:  Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios; Henry R Stämpfli; Yung-Fu Chang
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2014-09-11

6.  CMV Colitis: A Rare Complication of Azacitidine and Venetoclax Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Mustafa Nissar Bankur; Archie Keeling; Khoodoruth Mohamed Adil Shah; Daniele Avenoso
Journal:  Hematol Rep       Date:  2022-06-23

Review 7.  Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: comparison of four methods on specimens collected in Cary-Blair transport medium and tcdB PCR on fresh versus frozen samples.

Authors:  Noah A Brown; William D Lebar; Carol L Young; Rosemary E Hankerd; Duane W Newton
Journal:  Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2011-05-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.