Literature DB >> 18174535

Why men in the United Kingdom still want the prostate specific antigen test.

Alison Chapple1, Sue Ziebland, Paul Hewitson, Ann McPherson.   

Abstract

The prostate specific antigen (PSA) test is widely used to screen men for prostate cancer, but its value in diagnosing prostate cancer in asymptomatic men is controversial. In 2001, the U.K. Department of Health introduced the Prostate Cancer Risk Management Programme (PCRMP), through which men are given relatively detailed information before they make a final decision about a test. Little is known about men's experiences of the test since this program was introduced. We report an analysis of interviews with 30 men who were tested, or considered having a test, since the PCRMP was introduced. Our analysis suggests that men's views of the PSA test are dominated by their construction of testing as responsible health behavior and their perception of PSA as "just a blood test." Men's accounts also suggest that poor communication about the uncertainty of the test--and about treatment for prostate cancer--also persists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18174535     DOI: 10.1177/1049732307309000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  7 in total

1.  Beliefs and beyond: what can we learn from qualitative studies of lay people's understandings of cancer risk?

Authors:  Wendy L Lipworth; Heather M Davey; Stacy M Carter; Claire Hooker; Wendy Hu
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Experiences of Uncertainty in Men With an Elevated PSA.

Authors:  Caitlin Biddle; Alicia Brasel; Willie Underwood; Heather Orom
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-06-23

3.  Algorithms, nomograms and the detection of indolent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Monique J Roobol
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Enthusiasm for cancer screening in Great Britain: a general population survey.

Authors:  J Waller; K Osborne; J Wardle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  General Practitioners' Experiences of, and Responses to, Uncertainty in Prostate Cancer Screening: Insights from a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Kristen Pickles; Stacy M Carter; Lucie Rychetnik; Kirsten McCaffery; Vikki A Entwistle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A genetic risk assessment for prostate cancer influences patients' risk perception and use of repeat PSA testing: a cross-sectional study in Danish general practice.

Authors:  Jacob Fredsøe; Pia Kirkegaard; Adrian Edwards; Peter Vedsted; Karina Dalsgaard Sørensen; Flemming Bro
Journal:  BJGP Open       Date:  2020-06-23

7.  Perceptions about screening for prostate cancer using genetic lifetime risk assessment: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Pia Kirkegaard; Adrian Edwards; Trine Laura Overgaard Nielsen; Torben Falck Ørntoft; Karina Dalsgaard Sørensen; Michael Borre; Flemming Bro
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.497

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.