Literature DB >> 25979635

Experiences of Uncertainty in Men With an Elevated PSA.

Caitlin Biddle1, Alicia Brasel2, Willie Underwood3, Heather Orom1.   

Abstract

A significant proportion of men, ages 50 to 70 years, have, and continue to receive prostate specific antigen (PSA) tests to screen for prostate cancer (PCa). Approximately 70% of men with an elevated PSA level will not subsequently be diagnosed with PCa. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 13 men with an elevated PSA level who had not been diagnosed with PCa. Uncertainty was prominent in men's reactions to the PSA results, stemming from unanswered questions about the PSA test, PCa risk, and confusion about their management plan. Uncertainty was exacerbated or reduced depending on whether health care providers communicated in lay and empathetic ways, and provided opportunities for question asking. To manage uncertainty, men engaged in information and health care seeking, self-monitoring, and defensive cognition. Results inform strategies for meeting informational needs of men with an elevated PSA and confirm the primary importance of physician communication behavior for open information exchange and uncertainty reduction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; communication; medical; psychosocial aspect; screening and prevention; uncertainty

Year:  2016        PMID: 25979635      PMCID: PMC5675175          DOI: 10.1177/1557988315584376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Mens Health        ISSN: 1557-9883


  44 in total

1.  Health beliefs and physician identified "worried well".

Authors:  P J Wagner; P Curran
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Psychological adjustment to gynaecological cancer: patients' illness representations, coping strategies and mood disturbance.

Authors:  Rachel V Gould; Stephen L Brown; Ros Bramwell
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2010-06

3.  Patient knowledge about prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate cancer in Australia.

Authors:  David Pan; Philip McCahy
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 4.  A systematic review on communicating with patients about evidence.

Authors:  Lyndal J Trevena; Heather M Davey; Alexandra Barratt; Phyllis Butow; Patrina Caldwell
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 5.  A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate specific antigen.

Authors:  Philip Harvey; Amman Basuita; Deborah Endersby; Ben Curtis; Aphrodite Iacovidou; Mary Walker
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Impact of prostate cancer testing: an evaluation of the emotional consequences of a negative biopsy result.

Authors:  R C Macefield; C Metcalfe; J A Lane; J L Donovan; K N L Avery; J M Blazeby; L Down; D E Neal; F C Hamdy; K Vedhara
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Anxiety associated with prostate cancer screening with special reference to men with a positive screening test (elevated PSA) - Results from a prospective, population-based, randomised study.

Authors:  Sigrid Carlsson; Gunnar Aus; Catrin Wessman; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Are physicians discussing prostate cancer screening with their patients and why or why not? A pilot study.

Authors:  Carmen E Guerra; Samantha E Jacobs; John H Holmes; Judy A Shea
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Population-based screening for prostate cancer by measuring free and total serum prostate-specific antigen in Sweden.

Authors:  J Hugosson; G Aus; S Bergdahl; P Fernlund; R Frösing; P Lodding; C G Pihl; H Lilja
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Decision-making about PSA testing and prostate biopsies: a qualitative study embedded in a primary care randomised trial.

Authors:  Kerry N L Avery; Jane M Blazeby; J Athene Lane; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy; Jenny L Donovan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  3 in total

1.  Men's perception of information and descriptions of emotional strain in the diagnostic phase of prostate cancer-a qualitative individual interview study.

Authors:  Maja Elisabeth Juul Søndergaard; Kirsten Lode; Svein Reidar Kjosavik; Sissel Eikeland Husebø
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  Environmental Phenol and Paraben Exposure Risks and Their Potential Influence on the Gene Expression Involved in the Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Diaaidden Alwadi; Quentin Felty; Deodutta Roy; Changwon Yoo; Alok Deoraj
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Men's perception of information and psychological distress in the diagnostic phase of prostate cancer: a comparative mixed methods study.

Authors:  Maja Elisabeth Juul Søndergaard; Kirsten Lode; Sissel Eikeland Husebø; Ingvild Dalen; Svein Reidar Kjosavik
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-09-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.