Literature DB >> 25737892

Bone density and its importance in orthodontics.

Tina Chugh1, Abhay Kumar Jain2, Raj Kumar Jaiswal3, Praveen Mehrotra4, Rachita Mehrotra2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Researchers have generally focused on tissue reactions occurring within the periodontal ligament and bone to find possible explanation for various clinical phenomena, with less attention being paid to the inherent bone density. Recently, regional differences in jaw anatomy and bone structure including bone density have become important issue to explain some of the variation in clinical practice with respect to tooth movement, implant success rate, anchorage loss etc.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The intent of this review is to discuss various methods and classification proposed to determine bone density in particular area and its importance in field of orthodontia. Various clinical studies and research done in relation to bone density were searched using PubMed. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: This review endeavours to compile the research of bone density in maxilla and mandible. Many clinical studies have demonstrated relation between bone density and various clinical phenomena in dentistry. Knowledge of bone density in particular area of oral cavity may help the clinician to plan proper site for implant placement and various anchorage augmentation techniques in order to increase success rate of the treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anchorage; Bone density; Mandible; Maxilla; Mini-implant

Year:  2013        PMID: 25737892      PMCID: PMC3942226          DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2013.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res        ISSN: 2212-4268


  20 in total

Review 1.  Factors affecting heat generation during implant site preparation: a review of biologic observations and future considerations.

Authors:  S H Tehemar
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  Shih-Jung Cheng; I-Yun Tseng; Jang-Jaer Lee; Sang-Heng Kok
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  The application of three-dimensional quantitative computed tomography to the maxillofacial skeleton.

Authors:  K Maki; T Okano; T Morohashi; S Yamada; Y Shibaski
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  A comparison of maxillary and mandibular bone mineral densities.

Authors:  H Devlin; K Horner; D Ledgerton
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 5.  Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density: a review.

Authors:  C E Cann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  A density comparison of human alveolar and retromolar bone.

Authors:  D L Buck; P W Wheeler
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Identification of bone quality in conjunction with insertion of titanium implants. A pilot study in jaw autopsy specimens.

Authors:  B Friberg; L Sennerby; J Roos; U Lekholm
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  Radiologic methods to evaluate bone mineral content. Health and Public Policy Committee, American College of Physicians.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Assessment of bone mineral content and bone mass by non-invasive radiologic methods.

Authors:  J Andresen; H E Nielsen
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec

10.  Density of the alveolar and basal bones of the maxilla and the mandible.

Authors:  Hyo-Sang Park; Youn-Ju Lee; Seong-Hwa Jeong; Tae-Geon Kwon
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  6 in total

1.  Bio-structural monitoring of bone mineral alterations through electromechanical impedance measurements of a Piezo-device joined to a tooth.

Authors:  Hector A Tinoco; Carlos I Cardona; Maribel L F Marín-Berrio; Juliana García-Grisales; Juan P Gomez; Samuel I Roldan; Fabio M Peña; Adam Brinek; Dominika Kalasová; Jozef Kaiser; Tomas Zikmund
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2020-09-20

2.  Evaluation´ of mandibular alveolar bone in patients with different vertical facial patterns : A cross-sectional CBCT study.

Authors:  Sibel Akbulut; Seval Bayrak
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Effects of Recent/Healed Post-Extraction Protocols on Incisor and Canine Alignment During Fixed Orthodontic Appliance Therapy.

Authors:  Adedayo Ayomide Olabintan; Olayinka Donald Otuyemi; Kikelomo Adebanke Kolawole
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2022-06

4.  Pilot investigation on the dose-dependent impact of irradiation on primary human alveolar osteoblasts in vitro.

Authors:  Carmen Stromberger; Susanne Nahles; Anna-Klara Amler; Domenic Schlauch; Selin Tüzüner; Alexander Thomas; Norbert Neckel; Ingeborg Tinhofer; Max Heiland; Roland Lauster; Lutz Kloke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The effect of genetic polymorphisms on treatment duration following premolar extraction.

Authors:  Jiyon Yu; Yoon Jeong Choi; Sung-Hwan Choi; Han-Sung Jung; Ji Hyun Lee; Jung-Yul Cha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Relation Between Insertion Torque and Implant Stability Quotient: A Clinical Study.

Authors:  João Paulo do Vale Souza; Clóvis Lamartine de Moraes Melo Neto; Lucas Tavares Piacenza; Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva; André Luiz de Melo Moreno; Paulo Augusto Penitente; Juliana Lujan Brunetto; Daniela Micheline Dos Santos; Marcelo Coelho Goiato
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2021-07-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.