Literature DB >> 18172620

Assessment of the acute toxicity of triclosan and methyl triclosan in wastewater based on the bioluminescence inhibition of Vibrio fischeri.

Marinella Farré1, Daniela Asperger, Lina Kantiani, Susana González, Mira Petrovic, Damià Barceló.   

Abstract

In this work, the contributions of triclosan and its metabolite methyl triclosan to the overall acute toxicity of wastewater were studied using Vibrio fischeri. The protocol used in this paper involved various steps. First, the aquatic toxicities of triclosan and methyl triclosan were determined for standard substances, and the 50% effective concentrations (EC(50)) were determined for these compounds. Second, the toxic responses to different mixtures of triclosan, methyl triclosan, and surfactants were studied in different water matrices, i.e., Milli-Q water, groundwater and wastewater, in order to evaluate (i) the antagonistic or synergistic effects, and (ii) the influence of the water matrices. Finally, chemical analysis was used in conjunction with the toxicity results in order to assess the aquatic toxicities of triclosan and its derivative in wastewaters. In this study, the toxicities of 45 real samples corresponding to the influents and effluents from eight wastewater treatment works (WWTW) were analyzed. Thirty-one samples were from a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) equipped with two pilot-scale membrane bioreactors (MBR), and the influent and the effluent samples after various treatments were characterized via different chromatographic approaches, including solid-phase extraction (SPE), liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and SPE coupled to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The toxicity was determined by measuring the bioluminescence inhibition of Vibrio fischeri. In order to complete the study and to extrapolate the results to different WWTPs, the toxicity to V. fischeri of samples from seven more plants was analyzed, as were their triclosan and methyl triclosan concentrations. Good agreement was established between the overall toxicity values and concentrations of the biocides, indicating that triclosan is one of the major toxic organic pollutants currently found in domestic wastewaters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18172620     DOI: 10.1007/s00216-007-1779-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of hepatotoxicity and mechanisms induced by triclosan (TCS) and methyl-triclosan (MTCS) in human liver hepatocellular HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Boyu Mao; Huixin He; Yu Shang; Yufang Zhong; Zhiqiang Yu; Yiting Yang; Hui Li; Jing An
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 2.  Occurrence and toxicity of antimicrobial triclosan and by-products in the environment.

Authors:  Gilles Bedoux; Benoit Roig; Olivier Thomas; Virginie Dupont; Barbara Le Bot
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Methyl-triclosan and triclosan impact embryonic development of Danio rerio and Paracentrotus lividus.

Authors:  Sofia Macedo; Tiago Torres; Miguel M Santos
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Environmental Exposure of Aquatic and Terrestrial Biota to Triclosan and Triclocarban.

Authors:  Talia E Chalew; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  J Am Water Works Assoc       Date:  2009

5.  Using laboratory-generated biosolids to evaluate the microbial ecotoxicity of triclosan in a simulated land application scenario.

Authors:  Ryan M Holzem; Courtney M Gardner; Heather M Stapleton; Claudia K Gunsch
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Removal of diclofenac by a local bacterial consortium: UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis of metabolites and ecotoxicity assessment.

Authors:  Salima Aissaoui; Enelton Fagnani; Sandra Pérez; Houria Ouled-Haddar; Mohamed Sifour
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.476

7.  Impairment of the bacterial biofilm stability by triclosan.

Authors:  Helen V Lubarsky; Sabine U Gerbersdorf; Cédric Hubas; Sebastian Behrens; Francesco Ricciardi; David M Paterson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Antipyretic potential of dichloromethane leaf extract of Eucalyptus globulus (Labill) and Senna didymobotrya (Fresenius) in rats models.

Authors:  Joseph Kiambi Mworia; Cromwell Mwiti Kibiti; Mathew Piero Ngugi; Joseph Ngari Ngeranwa
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-12-07

Review 9.  A Review on the Fate of Legacy and Alternative Antimicrobials and Their Metabolites during Wastewater and Sludge Treatment.

Authors:  Timothy Abbott; Gokce Kor-Bicakci; Mohammad S Islam; Cigdem Eskicioglu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Transformation products and human metabolites of triclocarban and triclosan in sewage sludge across the United States.

Authors:  Benny F G Pycke; Isaac B Roll; Bruce J Brownawell; Chad A Kinney; Edward T Furlong; Dana W Kolpin; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.