Kevin K Dobbin1, Yingdong Zhao, Richard M Simon. 1. Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, Maryland 20852, USA. dobbinke@mail.nih.gov
Abstract
PURPOSE: A common goal of gene expression microarray studies is the development of a classifier that can be used to divide patients into groups with different prognoses, or with different expected responses to a therapy. These types of classifiers are developed on a training set, which is the set of samples used to train a classifier. The question of how many samples are needed in the training set to produce a good classifier from high-dimensional microarray data is challenging. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We present a model-based approach to determining the sample size required to adequately train a classifier. RESULTS: It is shown that sample size can be determined from three quantities: standardized fold change, class prevalence, and number of genes or features on the arrays. Numerous examples and important experimental design issues are discussed. The method is adapted to address ex post facto determination of whether the size of a training set used to develop a classifier was adequate. An interactive web site for performing the sample size calculations is provided. CONCLUSION: We showed that sample size calculations for classifier development from high-dimensional microarray data are feasible, discussed numerous important considerations, and presented examples.
PURPOSE: A common goal of gene expression microarray studies is the development of a classifier that can be used to divide patients into groups with different prognoses, or with different expected responses to a therapy. These types of classifiers are developed on a training set, which is the set of samples used to train a classifier. The question of how many samples are needed in the training set to produce a good classifier from high-dimensional microarray data is challenging. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We present a model-based approach to determining the sample size required to adequately train a classifier. RESULTS: It is shown that sample size can be determined from three quantities: standardized fold change, class prevalence, and number of genes or features on the arrays. Numerous examples and important experimental design issues are discussed. The method is adapted to address ex post facto determination of whether the size of a training set used to develop a classifier was adequate. An interactive web site for performing the sample size calculations is provided. CONCLUSION: We showed that sample size calculations for classifier development from high-dimensional microarray data are feasible, discussed numerous important considerations, and presented examples.
Authors: Zhibao Mi; Kui Shen; Nan Song; Chunrong Cheng; Chi Song; Naftali Kaminski; George C Tseng Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2010-08-17 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Fabian Lenhard; Sebastian Sauer; Erik Andersson; Kristoffer Nt Månsson; David Mataix-Cols; Christian Rück; Eva Serlachius Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2017-07-28 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Antonia Kolokythas; Mitchell J Bosman; Kristen B Pytynia; Suchismita Panda; Herve Y Sroussi; Yang Dai; Joel L Schwartz; Guy R Adami Journal: J Oral Pathol Med Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 4.253
Authors: Constantin F Aliferis; Alexander Statnikov; Ioannis Tsamardinos; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Bryan E Shepherd; Frank E Harrell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-03-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Hideaki Tahara; Marimo Sato; Magdalena Thurin; Ena Wang; Lisa H Butterfield; Mary L Disis; Bernard A Fox; Peter P Lee; Samir N Khleif; Jon M Wigginton; Stefan Ambs; Yasunori Akutsu; Damien Chaussabel; Yuichiro Doki; Oleg Eremin; Wolf Hervé Fridman; Yoshihiko Hirohashi; Kohzoh Imai; James Jacobson; Masahisa Jinushi; Akira Kanamoto; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; Kazunori Kato; Yutaka Kawakami; John M Kirkwood; Thomas O Kleen; Paul V Lehmann; Lance Liotta; Michael T Lotze; Michele Maio; Anatoli Malyguine; Giuseppe Masucci; Hisahiro Matsubara; Shawmarie Mayrand-Chung; Kiminori Nakamura; Hiroyoshi Nishikawa; A Karolina Palucka; Emanuel F Petricoin; Zoltan Pos; Antoni Ribas; Licia Rivoltini; Noriyuki Sato; Hiroshi Shiku; Craig L Slingluff; Howard Streicher; David F Stroncek; Hiroya Takeuchi; Minoru Toyota; Hisashi Wada; Xifeng Wu; Julia Wulfkuhle; Tomonori Yaguchi; Benjamin Zeskind; Yingdong Zhao; Mai-Britt Zocca; Francesco M Marincola Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2009-06-17 Impact factor: 5.531