Literature DB >> 18162354

Clinical advantages of 3.0 T MRI over 1.5 T.

Winfried A Willinek1, Hans H Schild.   

Abstract

Since approval by the FDA in 2000, human MR imaging (MRI) at 3.0 T has been increasingly used in clinical practice. In spite of the potential technical challenges, a number of clinical advantages of 3.0 T MRI over 1.5 T have been identified in the recent years. This article reviews the benefits and the current knowledge of 3.0 T whole-body MRI from an evidence-based perspective and summarizes its clinical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18162354     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  40 in total

Review 1.  An overview on development and application of an experimental platform for quantitative cardiac imaging research in rabbit models of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Yuanbo Feng; Jan Bogaert; Raymond Oyen; Yicheng Ni
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-10

2.  High-resolution 3D-constructive interference in steady-state MR imaging and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography in neurovascular compression: a comparison between 3T and 1.5T.

Authors:  M Garcia; R Naraghi; T Zumbrunn; J Rösch; P Hastreiter; A Dörfler
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Radiofrequency heating and magnetically induced displacement of dental magnetic attachments during 3.0 T MRI.

Authors:  K Miyata; M Hasegawa; Y Abe; T Tabuchi; T Namiki; T Ishigami
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  High relaxivity Gd(III)-DNA gold nanostars: investigation of shape effects on proton relaxation.

Authors:  Matthew W Rotz; Kayla S B Culver; Giacomo Parigi; Keith W MacRenaris; Claudio Luchinat; Teri W Odom; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Multiparametric MRI biomarkers for measuring vascular disrupting effect on cancer.

Authors:  Huaijun Wang; Guy Marchal; Yicheng Ni
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-28

6.  Relationship of clinical and cognitive variables with brain morphometric abnormalities in Alzheimer's disease: a voxel based morphometric study using 3-tesla MRI.

Authors:  Bhavani S Bagepally; John P John; Mathew Varghese; Harsha N Halahalli; Lakshminarayanan Kota; Palanimuthu T Sivakumar; Srikala Bharath; Sanjeev Jain
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 6.745

7.  Impact of field strength and RF excitation on abdominal diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Philipp Riffel; Raghuram K Rao; Stefan Haneder; Mathias Meyer; Stefan O Schoenberg; Henrik J Michaely
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-09-28

8.  3-T MRI safety assessments of magnetic dental attachments and castable magnetic alloys.

Authors:  M Hasegawa; K Miyata; Y Abe; T Ishii; T Ishigami; K Ohtani; E Nagai; T Ohyama; Y Umekawa; S Nakabayashi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Magnetization and demagnetization of magnetic dental attachments in a 3-T MRI system.

Authors:  Norio Hayashi; Akio Ogura; Toshio Tsuchihashi; Daisuke Takahashi; Tsuyoshi Matsuda; Shinya Seino; Tsukasa Doi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-04-27

10.  Radiofrequency heating of metallic dental devices during 3.0 T MRI.

Authors:  M Hasegawa; K Miyata; Y Abe; T Ishigami
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.