| Literature DB >> 18160980 |
Daniel H Libraty1, Khin S A Myint, Clinton K Murray, Robert V Gibbons, Mammen P Mammen, Timothy P Endy, Wenjun Li, David W Vaughn, Ananda Nisalak, Siripen Kalayanarooj, Duane R Hospenthal, Sharone Green, Alan L Rothman, Francis A Ennis.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Leptospirosis is an emerging zoonosis that is often under-recognized in children and commonly confused with dengue in tropical settings. An enhanced ability to distinguish leptospirosis from dengue in children would guide clinicians and public health personnel in the appropriate use of limited healthcare resources. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 18160980 PMCID: PMC2154391 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Figure 1Schematic flow diagram of study subject categorization and leptospirosis testing.
Summary of the pediatric leptospirosis cases.
| Case No. | Age (y) | Gender | Day | IgM ELISA | MAT highest titer | Leptospirosis Diagnosis | Clinical diagnosis at discharge | Comments |
| 1 (KPP) | 7 | F | 2 | 33.7 | 1∶3200 (Autumnalis) | Definite | Pharyngitis | |
| 9 | 27.9 | 1∶3200 | ||||||
| 2 (KPP) | 6 | M | 1 | 2.7 | neg | Definite | Viral infection | Developed conjunctivitis OD |
| 8 | 29.2 | 1∶3200 (Hebdomadis and Hardjo) | ||||||
| 3 (KPP) | 5 | M | 1 | 2.5 | neg | Definite | Viral infection | |
| 5 | 39.6 | 1∶1600 (Autumnalis) | ||||||
| 4 (KPP) | 11 | F | 1 | 2.0 | neg | Definite | Scrub Typhus | Weil-Felix serology, Proteus OX-K titer 1∶160 |
| 8 | 49.1 | 1∶3200 (Andamana) | ||||||
| 5 (KPP) | 14 | M | 1 | 2.7 | neg | Definite | Exudative Tonsillitis | |
| 9 | 26.1 | >1∶12,800 (Autumnalis) | ||||||
| 6 (KPP) | 12 | M | 1 | 1.9 | 1∶400 | Definite | Viral infection | Presented with maculopapular rash |
| 10 | 20.9 | >1∶12,800 (Autumnalis) | ||||||
| 7 (KPP) | 11 | M | 2 | 35.2 | 1∶6400 | Definite | Gastroenteritis | Developed chickenpox 1 day after discharge |
| 9 | 59.1 | 1∶3200 (Andamana and Canicola) | ||||||
| 8 (KPP) | 6 | M | 1 | 26.2 | neg | Definite | Dengue Fever | |
| 9 | 18.7 | 1∶400 (Cynopteri) | ||||||
| 9 (KPP) | 10 | M | 1 | 4.1 | Neg | Definite | Viral infection | |
| 9 | 24.7 | 1∶12,800 (Autumnalis and Icterohaemorrhagiae | ||||||
| 10 (KPP) | 10 | F | 6 | 8.2 | 1∶200 (Autumnalis and Icterohaemorrhagiae) | Probable | Dengue Fever | |
| 14 | 11.0 | |||||||
| 11 (KPP) | 11 | M | 1 | 4.1 | neg | Definite | Viral infection | Widal test for Salmonella typhi O (1∶40) |
| 9 | 40.9 | >1∶12,800 (Sejroe) | ||||||
| 12 (KPP) | 11 | M | 1 | 3.8 | 1∶400 (Autumnalis) | Probable | Scrub Typhus | Weil-Felix serology, Proteus OX-K titer 1∶80; |
| 5 | 14.9 | |||||||
| 13 (BKK) | 8 | M | 1 | 22.4 | Definite | Viral infection | ||
| 3 | 41.3 | 1∶1600 (Andamana) | ||||||
| 8 | 49.2 | |||||||
| 14 (BKK) | 13 | M | 1 | 18.6 | 1∶200 (Australis) | Probable | Dengue Fever | |
| 9 | 16.3 | 1∶200 (Andamana) | ||||||
| 15 (BKK) | 11 | M | 1 | 1.3 | Neg | Definite | Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever | Subconjunctival hemorrhage noted |
| 9 | 63.0 | 1∶6400 (Canicola) | ||||||
| 16 (BKK) | 7 | M | 2 | 8.9 | neg | Probable | Viral infection | Developed herpes simplex labialis |
| 9 | 11.1 | 1∶200 (Bratislava) | ||||||
| 17 (BKK) | 6 | F | 1 | 12.8 | 1∶800 | Definite | Viral infection | |
| 9 | 10.1 | 1∶800 (Autumnalis and Cynopteri) | ||||||
| 18 (BKK) | 4 | M | 1 | 3.6 | Neg | Definite | Viral Infection |
KPP = Kamphaeng Phet, BKK = Bangkok.
PanBio Leptospira IgM ELISA.
MAT = leptospira microscopic agglutination titer. Positive results are reported by serovar(s) reactive at the highest titer (lowest dilution). MATs are not adequate for determining the infecting Leptospire serovar but can allude to serogroup.
Figure 2Ages and months of presentation for children with leptospirosis or dengue in Kamphaeng Phet, Thailand.
(A) Age distribution of children presenting with leptospirosis (n = 12) or dengue (n = 118) in Kamphaeng Phet, Thailand. (B) Month of presentation of children with leptospirosis (n = 12) or dengue (n = 118) in Kamphaeng Phet, Thailand.
Case-control comparison of presenting symptoms and signs between children with leptospirosis and dengue.
| Symptom/Sign on presentation | Leptospirosis ( | Dengue ( | p-value |
| Age (y) | 9.5±3.0 | 8.6±2.5 | — |
| Gender (M∶F) | 3.5∶1 | 2.1∶1 | — |
| No. days of illness before presentation | 2.9±0.7 | 3.1±0.8 | NS |
| Fever (temp≥38.0°C) | 100% | 100% | — |
| Anorexia | 94% | 86% | NS |
| Headache | 72% | 84% | NS |
| Lethargy | 78% | 87% | NS |
| Nausea | 72% | 77% | NS |
| Vomiting | 61% | 76% | NS |
| Abdominal pain | 33% | 36% | NS |
| Hemorrhage/bleeding | 11% | 13% | NS |
| Rash | 6% | 1% | NS |
| Tourniquet Test (no. of petechiae/inch2) | ( | ( |
|
| <10 | 67% | 36% | |
| 10–19 | 11% | 25% | |
| ≥20 | 22% | 40% | |
| Palpable liver edge below right costal margin | 9% | 38% | 0.06 |
NS = not significant.
values are mean±S.D.
Case-control comparison of initial laboratory values between children with leptospirosis and dengue. Values are mean±S.D.
| Admission Laboratory Value | Leptospirosis ( | Dengue ( | p-value |
| White blood cell count (cells/mm3) | 10,531±3,445 | 5,492±2,807 |
|
| % neutrophils | 83±11 | 70±15 |
|
| Absolute neutrophil count (cells/mm3) | 8,932±3,570 | 4,039±2,660 |
|
| % lymphocytes | 13±9 | 21±14 |
|
| Absolute lymphocyte count (cells/mm3) | 1,163±687 | 958±670 | NS |
| % atypical lymphocytes | 1.9±2.9 | 3.7±4.4 |
|
| Platelets (x103/mm3) | 245±97 | 202±83 | 0.06 |
| hemoglobin (g/dl) | 13±0.9 | 12±1.1 | NS |
| hematocrit (%) | 38±3 | 38±3 | NS |
| AST | 42±16 | 66±57 |
|
| ALT | 26±14 | 32±32 | NS |
| Albumin (g/dl) | 4.5±0.5 | 4.8±0.6 |
|
NS = not significant.
AST = aspartate aminotransferase.
ALT = alanine aminotransferase.
Multivariate logistic regression model for leptospirosis vs. dengue .
| Variable | Unit of change | Multivariate OR [95% CI] | p-value |
| Absolute neutrophil count | 1,000/mm3 increase | 2.0 [1.5–2.6] | <0.001 |
| Plasma albumin level | 1.0 g/dl increase | 0.1 [0.03–0.4] | 0.001 |
| Plasma AST level | 30–80 IU/ml vs. <30 or >80 IU/ml | 10.6 [1.8–64.0] | 0.01 |
| Platelet count | <200,000/mm3 vs. ≥200,000/mm3 | 4.0 [0.9–17.4] | 0.06 |
All variables entered into model presented in text.
All variables are admission values obtained within 72 hours of illness onset.
Multivariate odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for leptospirosis compared to dengue.
AST = aspartate aminotransferase.
Figure 3Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the multivariate logistic regression model for leptospirosis vs. dengue (Table 4).
Diagonal line represents the null hypothesis.