Erik F J de Vries1, Janine Doorduin, Rudi A Dierckx, Aren van Waarde. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. e.f.j.de.vries@ngmb.umcg.nl
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Overexpression of cyclooxygenase type 2 (COX-2) is triggered by inflammatory stimuli, but it also plays a prominent role in the initiation and progression of various diseases. This study aims to investigate [(11)C]rofecoxib as a positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for COX-2 expression. METHODS: [(11)C]Rofecoxib was prepared by methylation of its sulphinate precursor. Regional brain distribution and specific binding of [(11)C]rofecoxib in healthy rats was studied by ex vivo biodistribution and autoradiography. Regional brain distribution and PET imaging studies were also performed on rats with severe encephalitis, caused by nasal infection with herpes simplex virus (HSV). Finally, ex vivo biodistribution and blocking studies were carried in rats with a sterile inflammation, induced by intramuscular turpentine injection. RESULTS: [(11)C]rofecoxib brain uptake in control animals corresponded with the known distribution of COX-2. Pretreatment with NS398 significantly reduced tracer uptake in the cingulate/frontopolar cortex, whereas the reduction in hippocampus approached significance. Ex vivo autoradiography also revealed preferential tracer uptake in hippocampus and cortical areas that could be blocked by NS398. In HSV-infected animals, [(11)C]rofecoxib uptake was moderately increased in all brain regions, but it could not be blocked with indomethacin. Yet, some PET images revealed increased tracer uptake in brain areas with microglia activation. In turpentine-injected animals, [(11)C]rofecoxib uptake in inflamed muscle was not higher than in control muscle and could not be blocked with NS398. Indomethacin caused a slight reduction in muscle uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the apparent correlation between [(11)C]rofecoxib uptake and COX-2 distribution in healthy rats, [(11)C]rofecoxib could not unambiguously detect COX-2 overexpression in two rat models of inflammation.
BACKGROUND: Overexpression of cyclooxygenase type 2 (COX-2) is triggered by inflammatory stimuli, but it also plays a prominent role in the initiation and progression of various diseases. This study aims to investigate [(11)C]rofecoxib as a positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for COX-2 expression. METHODS:[(11)C]Rofecoxib was prepared by methylation of its sulphinate precursor. Regional brain distribution and specific binding of [(11)C]rofecoxib in healthy rats was studied by ex vivo biodistribution and autoradiography. Regional brain distribution and PET imaging studies were also performed on rats with severe encephalitis, caused by nasal infection with herpes simplex virus (HSV). Finally, ex vivo biodistribution and blocking studies were carried in rats with a sterile inflammation, induced by intramuscular turpentine injection. RESULTS:[(11)C]rofecoxib brain uptake in control animals corresponded with the known distribution of COX-2. Pretreatment with NS398 significantly reduced tracer uptake in the cingulate/frontopolar cortex, whereas the reduction in hippocampus approached significance. Ex vivo autoradiography also revealed preferential tracer uptake in hippocampus and cortical areas that could be blocked by NS398. In HSV-infected animals, [(11)C]rofecoxib uptake was moderately increased in all brain regions, but it could not be blocked with indomethacin. Yet, some PET images revealed increased tracer uptake in brain areas with microglia activation. In turpentine-injected animals, [(11)C]rofecoxib uptake in inflamed muscle was not higher than in control muscle and could not be blocked with NS398. Indomethacin caused a slight reduction in muscle uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the apparent correlation between [(11)C]rofecoxib uptake and COX-2 distribution in healthy rats, [(11)C]rofecoxib could not unambiguously detect COX-2 overexpression in two rat models of inflammation.
Authors: Md Jashim Uddin; Brenda C Crews; Anna L Blobaum; Philip J Kingsley; D Lee Gorden; J Oliver McIntyre; Lynn M Matrisian; Kotha Subbaramaiah; Andrew J Dannenberg; David W Piston; Lawrence J Marnett Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-05-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Anuj K Yadav; Christopher J Reinhardt; Andres S Arango; Hannah C Huff; Liang Dong; Michael G Malkowski; Aditi Das; Emad Tajkhorshid; Jefferson Chan Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Daniele de Paula Faria; Sjef Copray; Carlos Buchpiguel; Rudi Dierckx; Erik de Vries Journal: J Neuroimmune Pharmacol Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Arkadij M Elizarov; Carl Meinhart; Reza Miraghaie; R Michael van Dam; Jiang Huang; Antoine Daridon; James R Heath; Hartmuth C Kolb Journal: Biomed Microdevices Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 2.838