Literature DB >> 18158295

Perceptions of preventable medical errors in Alberta, Canada.

Herbert Northcott1, Laura Vanderheyden, Jennifer Northcott, Carol Adair, Charlene McBrien-Morrison, Peter Norton, John Cowell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: (i) To compare public perceptions of the frequency, responsibility, causes and solutions for preventable medical errors for persons who report and do not report having experienced a preventable medical error while receiving healthcare services in Alberta, Canada. (ii) To describe public opinion about confidentiality and disclosure of preventable medical error. (iii) To examine the relationship between reporting preventable medical error and perceived quality of the healthcare system.
METHODS: Population-based telephone survey. Households selected by random digit dialing and individual in household selected by most recent birthday. Province of Alberta, Canada. Representative sample of adult Albertans (N = 1500). Public perceptions of the frequency, responsibility, causes and solutions for preventable medical error; opinions about confidentiality and disclosure; perceived quality of the healthcare system.
RESULTS: Five hundred and fifty-nine (37.3%; 95% CI 34.8-39.8%) of 1500 respondents reported that they or a family member had ever experienced a preventable medical error while receiving health care in Alberta, Canada. Respondents who reported a preventable medical error were more likely to believe that preventable medical errors occur with greater frequency, were less likely to think that their doctor would tell them if a preventable medical error was made in their care, and tended to rate the quality of the healthcare system less favourably.
CONCLUSION: This paper provides healthcare managers and policymakers with insight into the public's perceptions of preventable medical error and may facilitate the development of strategies to improve patient safety, public confidence and public satisfaction with the healthcare system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18158295     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  5 in total

1.  Patient perceptions of mistakes in ambulatory care.

Authors:  Christine E Kistler; Louise C Walter; C Madeline Mitchell; Philip D Sloane
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-13

2.  The public's voice about healthcare quality regulation policies. A population-based survey.

Authors:  Renée Bouwman; Manja Bomhoff; Judith D de Jong; Paul Robben; Roland Friele
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Reflection of medical error highlighted on media in Turkey: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Oguz Isik; Gamze Bayin; Ozgur Ugurluoglu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  Doctors are to blame for perceived medical adverse events. A cross sectional population study. The Tromsø Study.

Authors:  Ragnar Hotvedt; Olav Helge Førde
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Frequency and nature of potentially harmful preventable problems in primary care from the patient's perspective with clinician review: a population-level survey in Great Britain.

Authors:  Susan Jill Stocks; Ailsa Donnelly; Aneez Esmail; Joanne Beresford; Sarah Luty; Richard Deacon; Avril Danczak; Nicola Mann; David Townsend; James Ashley; Carolyn Gamble; Paul Bowie; Stephen M Campbell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.