Jonathon H Yoder1, Dawn M Elliott. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 424 Stemmler Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6081, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The mechanical properties of extracellular matrix grafts that are intended to augment or replace soft tissues should be comparable to the native tissue. Such grafts are often used in fiber-reinforced tissue applications that undergo multi-axial loading and therefore knowledge of the anisotropic and nonlinear properties are needed, including the moduli and Poisson's ratio in two orthogonal directions within the plane of the graft. The objective of this study was to measure the tensile mechanical properties of several marketed grafts: Alloderm, Restore, CuffPatch, and OrthADAPT. METHODS: The degree of anisotropy and non-linearity within each graft was evaluated from uniaxial tensile tests and compared to their native tissue. FINDINGS: The Alloderm graft was anisotropic in both the toe- and linear-region of the stress-strain response, was highly nonlinear, and generally had low properties. The Restore and CuffPatch grafts had similar stress-strain responses, were largely isotropic, had a linear-region modulus of 18MPa, and were nonlinear. OrthADAPT was anisotropic in the linear-region (131 MPA vs 47MPa in the toe-region) and was highly nonlinear. The Poisson ratio for all grafts was between 0.4 and 0.7, except for the parallel orientation of Restore which was greater than 1.0. INTERPRETATION: Having an informed understanding of how the available grafts perform mechanically will allow for better assessment by the physician for which graft to apply depending upon its application. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: The mechanical properties of extracellular matrix grafts that are intended to augment or replace soft tissues should be comparable to the native tissue. Such grafts are often used in fiber-reinforced tissue applications that undergo multi-axial loading and therefore knowledge of the anisotropic and nonlinear properties are needed, including the moduli and Poisson's ratio in two orthogonal directions within the plane of the graft. The objective of this study was to measure the tensile mechanical properties of several marketed grafts: Alloderm, Restore, CuffPatch, and OrthADAPT. METHODS: The degree of anisotropy and non-linearity within each graft was evaluated from uniaxial tensile tests and compared to their native tissue. FINDINGS: The Alloderm graft was anisotropic in both the toe- and linear-region of the stress-strain response, was highly nonlinear, and generally had low properties. The Restore and CuffPatch grafts had similar stress-strain responses, were largely isotropic, had a linear-region modulus of 18MPa, and were nonlinear. OrthADAPT was anisotropic in the linear-region (131 MPA vs 47MPa in the toe-region) and was highly nonlinear. The Poisson ratio for all grafts was between 0.4 and 0.7, except for the parallel orientation of Restore which was greater than 1.0. INTERPRETATION: Having an informed understanding of how the available grafts perform mechanically will allow for better assessment by the physician for which graft to apply depending upon its application. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Devanathan Raghavan; Bradley P Kropp; H-K Lin; Yuanyuan Zhang; Richard Cowan; Sundararajan V Madihally Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2005-04-01 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Vijay Bindingnavele; Mark Gaon; Ken S Ota; David A Kulber; Dong-Joon Lee Journal: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Date: 2007-04-25 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Stephanie M Perry; Rishi R Gupta; Jonathan Van Kleunen; Matthew L Ramsey; Louis J Soslowsky; David L Glaser Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2007-07-12 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Kathleen A Derwin; Andrew R Baker; Rebecca K Spragg; Diane R Leigh; Joseph P Iannotti Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Frank Winterroth; Kyle W Hollman; Shiuhyang Kuo; Arindam Ganguly; Stephen E Feinberg; J Brian Fowlkes; Scott J Hollister Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 3.056
Authors: Joseph Fenner; Amanda C Stacer; Frank Winterroth; Timothy D Johnson; Kathryn E Luker; Gary D Luker Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Mara Terzini; Cristina Bignardi; Carlotta Castagnoli; Irene Cambieri; Elisabetta M Zanetti; Alberto L Audenino Journal: Open Biomed Eng J Date: 2016-04-08