| Literature DB >> 18154678 |
Joseph R Shaw1, John K Colbourne, Jennifer C Davey, Stephen P Glaholt, Thomas H Hampton, Celia Y Chen, Carol L Folt, Joshua W Hamilton.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genomic research tools such as microarrays are proving to be important resources to study the complex regulation of genes that respond to environmental perturbations. A first generation cDNA microarray was developed for the environmental indicator species Daphnia pulex, to identify genes whose regulation is modulated following exposure to the metal stressor cadmium. Our experiments revealed interesting changes in gene transcription that suggest their biological roles and their potentially toxicological features in responding to this important environmental contaminant.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 18154678 PMCID: PMC2234263 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-477
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Effects of 21-day cadmium exposure on Daphnia pulex
| Cadmium (μg/l) | Length (mm) | Lipid-Ovary Indexa | Number of Clutchesa | Total neonatesa | Per Capita Birth Rate (b)a |
| 0 | 2.90 ± 0.11a | 3.83 ± 1.50a | 5.50 ± 0.55a | 118.86 ± 29.94a | 5.37 ± 0.89a |
| 0.25 | 2.54 ± 0.10b | 1.57 ± 1.13b | 4.63 ± 0.52a | 65.13 ± 16.60b | 2.88 ± 0.66b |
| 0.5 | 2.41 ± 0.12b | 1.14 ± 0.69b | 4.29 ± 0.76a | 51.00 ± 25.66b | 2.22 ± 1.12b |
| 1 | 2.26 ± 0.16b, c | 1.25 ± 0.96b | 2.00 ± 1.00b | 8.60 ± 3.85c | 0.39 ± 0.18c |
| 1.75 | 2.16 ± 0.12c | 1.00 ± 0.93b | 2.22 ± 1.09b | 13.00 ± 8.04c | 0.58 ± 0.34c |
| 2.5 | 2.04 ± 0.14c | 1.0 ± 0.83b | 1.50 ± 1.05b | 5.67 ± 5.32c | 0.25 ± 0.23c |
aValues with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Figure 1Cadmium induced phenotype. Representative micrographs of 21-d Daphnia pulex maintained under A) control conditions or B) exposed to cadmium (2.5 μg Cd/L). Images were collected at the same scale and are presented as raw image files. Differences were observed in a) body length and b) number of eggs in the brood chamber. The control animal also has a larger c) ovary and more pronounced lipid stores (represented by arrows).
Figure 2Cadmium effects on gene expression: Buffers, blanks, and controls. Gene expression data from control and cadmium (20 μg Cd/L for 48-h) treated Daphnia pulex [GEO:GSE9746]. Data were LOESS normalized; duplicate probes were averaged within LIMMA using gene-wise linear models fit to expression data, and gene expression log ratios (M = log2 treated/control) were plotted against log mean intensity values (A = 1/2log2 (treated * control). Print control elements (buffers, blanks, betaine; grey shades); negative controls (non-daphniid cDNA; pink); and positive controls (D. pulex cytochrome b and c, actin, and ferritin; green) are highlighted.
Cadmium regulated microarray elements
| Siga | Seqb | EST Cluster | M averagec | A averagec | Hit Description | P Valued | Putative GO annotations |
| 8 | 9 | Contig 262 | 1.02 ± 0.31 | 10.12 ± 1.88 | 2-domain hemoglobin protein subunit | < 0.001 | GO:0015671, GO:0005833, GO:0005344 |
| 2 | 16 | Contig 272 | 0.43 ± 0.21 | 9.06 ± 1.50 | CG30045-PA | < 0.001 | GO:0042302 |
| 1 | 1 | Singlet 433 | 0.71 | 12.08 | CG6305-PA | 0.062 | GO:0042302 |
| 1 | 1 | Singlet 498 | 1.02 | 9.15 | chitinase-1 | 0.028 | GO:0008061, GO:0006030, GO:0004568, GO:0005576 |
| 3 | 4 | Contig 213 | 0.82 ± 0.12 | 9.07 ± 0.53 | chitinase-2 | < 0.001 | GO:0008061, GO:0006030, GO:0004568, GO:0005576 |
| 1 | 3 | Contig 218 | 0.93 ± 0.19 | 9.64 ± 1.77 | chitotriosidase | 0.005 | GO:0008061, GO:0006030, GO:0016798, GO:0005576 |
| 1 | 3 | Contig 209 | 0.41 ± 0.17 | 12.21 ± 1.48 | CUO6 BLACRCuticle protein 6 (BcNCP14.9) | 0.06 | GO:0042302 |
| 4 | 6 | Contig 241 | 1.07 ± 0.31 | 10.76 ± 2.07 | cuticle protein-1 | 0.018 | GO:0042302 |
| 5 | 8 | Contig 257 | 1.03 ± 0.33 | 9.96 ± 1.54 | cuticle protein-2 | < 0.001 | GO:0042302 |
| 13 | 28 | Contig 273 | 0.91 ± 0.32 | 10.05 ± 1.65 | cuticle protein-3 | < 0.001 | GO:0042302 |
| 1 | 3 | Contig 149 | 0.72 ± 0.28 | 8.55 ± 0.92 | cuticle protein-4 | 0.011 | GO:0042302 |
| 5 | 8 | Contig 261 | 0.88 ± 0.30 | 9.87 ± 1.42 | cuticle protein-5 | < 0.001 | GO:0042302 |
| 1 | 1 | Singlet 15 | 1.23 | 14.06 | ERGA6350 | 0.009 | |
| 1 | 1 | Singlet 469 | 0.80 | 7.99 | helix-loop-helix transcription factor | 0.055 | GO:0006355, GO:0003677 |
| 1 | 1 | Contig 21 | 1.45 | 10.03 | hemoglobin-1 | 0.003 | GO:0015671, GO:0005833, GO:0005344 |
| 1 | 1 | Contig 16 | 1.08 | 9.81 | hemoglobin-2 | < 0.001 | GO:0015671, GO:0005833, GO:0005344 |
| 1 | 1 | Singlet 65 | 2.16 | 8.34 | Hypothetical protein CBG14247 | < 0.001 | |
| 4 | 4 | Contig 221 | 1.98 ± 0.47 | 8.88 ± 0.82 | Metallothionein | < 0.001 | GO:0046872, GO:0006875 |
| 1 | 5 | Contig 220 | 0.31 ± 0.49 | 8.95 ± 0.62 | myosin 2 light chain | 0.08 | GO:0005509 |
| 2 | 4 | Contig 227 | 0.70 ± 0.04 | 12.59 ± 2.37 | OPSC1 HEMSACompound eye opsin BCRH1 | 0.036 | GO:0007602, GO:0016021, GO:0001584, GO:0007186 |
| 1 | 1 | Singlet 251 | 1.18 | 10.90 | PREDICTED: similar to chitinase | 0.019 | GO:0008061, GO:0006030, GO:0016798, GO:0005576 |
| 1 | 1 | Singlet 459 | 1.15 | 7.42 | PREDICTED: similar to glutathione S-transferase | 0.021 | GO:0016740 |
| 1 | 1 | Singlet 1 | 1.94 | 8.99 | Unknown EST-1 | 0.009 | |
| 3 | 3 | Contig 232 | 1.14 ± 037 | 8.27 ± 0.99 | Unknown EST-2 | < 0.001 | |
| 7 | 8 | Contig 253 | 1.05 ± 0.44 | 9.99 ± 1.38 | Unknown EST-3 | < 0.001 | |
| 1 | 1 | Singlet 166 | 0.87 | 8.20 | Unknown EST-4 | 0.048 | |
| 1 | 1 | Singlet 64 | 0.75 | 9.95 | Unknown EST-5 | 0.059 | |
| 1 | 1 | Singlet 49 | 0.74 | 8.77 | Unknown EST-6 | 0.067 | |
| 1 | 5 | Contig 237 | 0.33 ± 0.21 | 10.11 ± 1.55 | Unknown EST-7 | 0.073 | |
| 1 | 1 | Singlet 172 | 0.68 | 8.23 | Unknown EST-8 | 0.071 | |
| 24 | Unsequenced | ||||||
| Siga | Seqb | EST Cluster | M averagec | A averagec | Hit Description | P Valued | Putative GO annotations |
| 1 | 2 | Contig 135 | -0.36 ± 0.66 | 9.28 ± 0.08 | carboxypeptidase A1 | 0.068 | GO:0006508, GO:0004182 |
| 1 | 1 | Singlet 97 | -1.04 | 6.94 | endo-1,4-mannanase | 0.009 | GO:0016985, GO:0000272 |
| 1 | 3 | Contig 202 | -0.38 ± 0.36 | 8.39 ± 1.02 | PREDICTED: similar to CG31997-PA | 0.036 | |
| 2 | 2 | Contig 83 | -1.29 ± 0.06 | 8.00 ± 0.40 | PREDICTED: similar to monooxygenase | 0.001 | |
| 1 | 3 | Contig 162 | -0.37 ± 0.30 | 8.98 ± 1.04 | ribosomal protein S11-2 | 0.02 | GO:0006412, GO:0003735, GO:0005840 |
| 1 | 2 | Contig 191 | -0.61 ± 0.27 | 10.76 ± 3.35 | Unknown EST-1 | 0.019 | |
| 2 | 4 | Contig 212 | -0.72 ± 0.38 | 8.77 ± 0.97 | Unknown EST-2 | < 0.001 | |
| 4 | 5 | Contig 229 | -1.32 ± 0.11 | 9.96 ± 0.90 | Unknown EST-3 | < 0.001 | |
| 4 | 7 | Contig 249 | -1.08 ± 0.27 | 8.13 ± 0.98 | Unknown EST-4 | < 0.001 | |
| 1 | 2 | Contig 56 | -0.41 ± 0.36 | 9.25 ± 0.99 | Unknown EST-5 | 0.056 | |
| 1 | 1 | Contig 71 | -0.71 | 6.21 | Unknown EST-6 | 0.027 | |
| 1 | 1 | Singlet 79 | -1.08 | 8.90 | Unknown EST-7 | 0.014 | |
| 10 | Unsequenced | ||||||
aNumber of microarray elements determined to be significant on the array using the empirical Bayes method to shrink the gene-wise error estimate in cadmium treated vs. control Daphnia pulex (P < 0.05). control Daphnia pulex (P ≤ 0.05).
bNumber of microarray elements selected for sequencing based on cadmium response determined in the current study; Eads et al., in review; and Colbourne et al., in review.
cMean value (± SD) based on all sequenced microarray elements.
dPermutation tests were performed for clones sharing common putative annotations. These tests included 1000 simulations using the mean expression values to determine the Probability of obtaining the M average for an EST cluster.
Figure 3Cadmium effects on gene expression: Regulated genes. Gene expression data from control and cadmium (20 μg Cd/L for 48-h) treated Daphnia pulex [GEO:GSE9746]. Micorarray elements determined to significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) using the empirical Bayes (ebayes) method to shrink gene-wise error estimate in cadmium treated vs. control animals are highlighted (up-regulated elements in pink; down-regulated elements in green).
Figure 4Annotations of genes responding to cadmium. The distribution of gene annotations for the list of 45 Daphnia pulex genes (EST clusters) responding to cadmium treatment on the microarray based on results from Blastx searches against the NCBI non-redundant protein database. (A) The assignment of 49 annotations of molecular function to 26 genes from level 3 of the Gene Ontology. (B) The assignment of 74 annotations of biological process to 17 genes from level 4 of the Gene Ontology. Blastx queries recorded the best 5 matches with an E-value threshold of 1 × 10-3 and a minimal value of 33 aligned amino acids. Gene Ontology (GO) terms were assigned to genes using Blast2GO [41] with the following configurations: Pre-eValue-hit filter 1 × 10-3; Pre-similarity-hit filter 2; Annotation cut-off 35; GO weight 5.
Real-time PCR primer pairs
| Cutilcle protein | CGTCGCCGATGTGAAATAC | AAGAAGAACCTTTGTGATAGGAATC | GGATATGCCAAGTACCCCGAGT | GGCATCGTATTTTGGA | |
| Hemoglobin | TTCAAAGCCAAACCCGAAGC | TTGGCAAATCCGTAATGGACA | AGAAGCTCTTTTCGGAATTCGCCAACG | AGCGTTCAGGAAATCGT | |
| Metallothionein | AAACTACCCAACGGAATCAACAT | CAGTTGGGTCCGCATTTG | CCACACGAGCATTTACCTTGGCAAC | ||
| STKa | TTTTTAACAGAACCATCTTTGTCCAA | GACATAGTTTTTCAACATTCCTTCACAG | GTGTAAGTACGAGTTAAAGAAATTATCAGCCATC | CTGATACACAAGGTACGATAA |
aSerine threonine kinase
Figure 5Confirmation of array results. Quantitative-real time (Q-RT)-PCR was used to confirm a subset of genes identified with the microarrays to be regulated in response to cadmium; A) cuticle protein-2, Contig 257, B) 2-domain haemoglobin protein subunit, Contig 262, C) metallothionein, Contig 221) and one gene for which expression was not altered D) serine-threonine kinase, Contig 274 (Table 2). Sequences for primer pairs and probes are provided in Table 3. Expression levels were validated using aliquots sub-sampled from pools of RNA that were used for microarray analysis (technical validation, open triangles) and RNA collected from repeated, independent exposures (biological validation, open bars, mean ± SD, n = 5).
Figure 6Metallothionein gene models. Daphnia pulex metallothionein gene models. A) Dpu Mtn1 [GenBank:EU307302], B) Dpu Mtn2 [GenBank:EU307303], and C) Dpu Mtn3 [GenBank:EU307304].
Amino acid alignment of three D. pulex metallothionein genes against those from other crustaceans (decapods) and from selected insectsa.
| Protein domains | |
| Mtn1 | |
| Mtn2 | |
| MtnA | |
| MtnB | |
| MtnC | |
| MtnD | |
| CuMtn2 | |
| Mtn1 | |
| Mtn2 | |
| Mtn1 | |
| Mtn2 | |
| Mtn1 | |
| Mtn | |
| Mtn | |
| Mtn | |
| Mtn | |
| Mtn | |
| Mtn | |
| Mtn1 | |
| Mtn2 | |
| Mtn3 | |
| Mtn3 | |
| Cysteine residues | |
| Metal binding |
aCysteine residues are bold for sites that are conserved in crustacean and insect genes (residues 3–10, 23, 24) and underlined when residues are clade-specific. Assuming a correct alignment, residues 2, 12, 13, 17, 19 and 20 are conserved in all (or most) of the crustacean genes, whereas residues 14 and 22 are conserved in the decapod genes. The residues 15, 16, 18 and 21 are exclusively found in the Daphnia genes (representing branchiopods) and based on the limited sampling of insect genes (from two dipterans), residues 1 and 11 are excluded in the crustacean genes. Domain partitions and metal bind residues (*) are based on experimental evidence from decapod proteins (Valls et al. [41]). ¥ Poynton et al. [19] provides full translation.
Figure 7Phylogeny of crustacean metallothioneins. Neighbor-Joining tree constructed from an amino acid alignment of the three Daphnia pulex metallothionein proteins plus 18 sequences from 11 selected insect and crustacean taxa using the E-INS-I algorithm implemented by MAFFT [92]. Gaps within alignments were ignored in pairwise comparisons of the sequences and the genetic distances were corrected by the Poisson distribution model. The NCBI accession numbers are listed beside each taxonomic gene designation. Percent bootstrap support for nodes are shown, which are derived from 1000 pseudo-replication of the data. The Daphnia sequences were deposited at GenBank under the accession numbers Dpu Mtn1 [GenBank:EU307302]; Dpu Mtn2 [GenBank:EU307303]; and Dpu Mtn3 [GenBank:EU307304].
Figure 8Cadmium effects on gene expression: literature reports. Gene expression data from control and cadmium (20 μg Cd/L for 48-h) treated Daphnia pulex [GEO:GSE9746]. Micorarray elements, which are known from the literature to be regulated by cadmium, are highlighted: Cuticle protein, pink; Hemoglobin, green; Metallothionein, blue; Ferritin, orange; Chitinase, yellow; Opsin, grey.