Literature DB >> 1814485

Long-term effects of rigid fixation on the growing craniomaxillofacial skeleton.

M A Marschall1, S A Chidyllo, A A Figueroa, M Cohen.   

Abstract

Fixation of craniomaxillofacial bones with plates and screws is becoming an increasingly popular method of managing patients with maxillofacial fractures, congenital anomalies, and skeletal defects after tumor extirpation. The effects of rigid fixation on growth, however, are not well defined and remain controversial. This experimental work was designed to evaluate the effects of rigid fixation on the growing craniomaxillofacial skeleton. Eight 2-month-old beagle dogs were divided into two groups. Cephalometric analysis and computed tomography were obtained preoperatively to establish a baseline of the craniomaxillofacial skeleton. Rigid fixation using plates and screws was applied across the intact coronal and nasofrontal sutures. The contralateral side served as the control. The periosteum was elevated over the contralateral suture and replaced without any surgical intervention. The animals were killed one year after application of rigid fixation, when they had achieved full and mature skeletal growth. The skulls were evaluated both grossly and cephalometrically. There was bony growth over some of the plates, as well as sclerosis of the plated suture lines. Cephalometric analysis demonstrated consistent asymmetry between the plated and nonplated sides, with deviation of the midline toward the plated side in all of the animals. Although further studies are necessary to clarify this issue fully, we conclude from our study that rigid fixation during skeletal development can potentially alter the growth patterns of the craniomaxillofacial skeleton and should be used with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1814485     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-199102020-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  6 in total

1.  Choice of internal rigid fixation materials in the treatment of facial fractures.

Authors:  Mirko S Gilardino; Elliot Chen; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-03

Review 2.  Is the Mandibular Growth Affected by Internal Rigid Fixation?: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Humberto Fernández-Olarte; Andrés Gómez-Delgado; Dayan López-Dávila; Rodolfo Rangel-Perdomo; Gloria Inés Lafaurie; Leandro Chambrone
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-09-29

3.  [Implant materials for the internal fixation of midfacial fractures].

Authors:  B A Stuck; T Heller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Resorbable Versus Titanium Rigid Fixation for Pediatric Mandibular Fractures: A Systematic Review, Institutional Experience and Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew E Pontell; Eva B Niklinska; Stephane A Braun; Nolan Jaeger; Kevin J Kelly; Michael S Golinko
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2021-06-21

Review 5.  Pediatric orbital fractures.

Authors:  Adam J Oppenheimer; Laura A Monson; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-01-16

6.  Bioresorbable plate fracture after cranioplasty caused by head injury: a pediatric case.

Authors:  Kohei Igarashi; Atsushi Kuge; Hiroshi Homma; Tetsu Yamaki; Rei Kondo; Shinjiro Saito; Yukihiko Sonoda
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-12-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.