Literature DB >> 1811063

A biomechanical rationale for the use of short implants.

L B Lum1.   

Abstract

In general, the use of short implants has not been recommended by some because it is believed that occlusal forces must be dissipated over a large implant area in order for the bone to be preserved. Finite element modeling (FEM) analyses have shown that the occlusal forces are distributed primarily to the crestal bone rather than evenly throughout the entire surface area of the implant interface. Since masticatory forces are light and fleeting, these forces are normally well-tolerated by the bone. It is the bruxing forces that must be adequately attenuated, and this may be done by increasing the diameter and number of implants.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1811063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  9 in total

1.  Stress Distribution Around Single Short Dental Implants: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  S Vidya Bhat; Priyanka Premkumar; K Kamalakanth Shenoy
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2014-09-10

2.  Developing a new dental implant design and comparing its biomechanical features with four designs.

Authors:  Mansour Rismanchian; Reza Birang; Mahdi Shahmoradi; Hassan Talebi; Reza Jabar Zare
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2010

Review 3.  Short dental implants in reduced alveolar bone height: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Marcin Tutak; Tomasz Smektała; Katarzyna Schneider; Edyta Gołębiewska; Katarzyna Sporniak-Tutak
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2013-11-21

4.  Photoelastic analysis of fixed partial prosthesis crown height and implant length on distribution of stress in two dental implant systems.

Authors:  Evandro Portela Figueirêdo; Eder Alberto Sigua-Rodriguez; Marcele Jardim Pimentel; Ana Regina Oliveira Moreira; Mauro Antônio de Arruda Nóbilo; José Ricardo de Albergaria-Barbosa
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2014-10-08

5.  A two-short-implant-supported molar restoration in atrophic posterior maxilla: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ho-Yong Song; Yoon-Hyuk Huh; Chan-Jin Park; Lee-Ra Cho
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  The Effect of Implant Length and Diameter on Stress Distribution around Single Implant Placement in 3D Posterior Mandibular FE Model Directly Constructed Form In Vivo CT.

Authors:  Akikazu Shinya; Yoshiki Ishida; Daisuke Miura; Akiyoshi Shinya
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Rehabilitation of Atrophic Mandible with Ultrashort Implants Combined with Photobiomodulation Therapy: A Split-Mouth Design Study.

Authors:  Sara Mahmoud Zayed; Marwa Gamal Noureldin
Journal:  Saudi J Med Med Sci       Date:  2022-08-22

Review 8.  Short Dental Implants (≤7mm) Versus Longer Implants in Augmented Bone Area: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Priscila N Uehara; Victor Haruo Matsubara; Fernando Igai; Newton Sesma; Marcio K Mukai; Mauricio G Araujo
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2018-04-30

9.  One-Piece Implants with Smooth Concave Neck to Enhance Soft Tissue Development and Preserve Marginal Bone Levels: A Retrospective Study with 1- to 6-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Axiotis; Paolo Nuzzolo; Carlo Barausse; Roberta Gasparro; Paolo Bucci; Roberto Pistilli; Gilberto Sammartino; Pietro Felice
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.