Literature DB >> 18097626

Short-term efficacy and complications of posterior intravaginal slingplasty.

Ali M Luck1, Andrew C Steele, Fah Che Leong, Mary T McLennan.   

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and complications of the posterior intravaginal slingplasty (IVS). A retrospective chart review was performed. Ninety IVS procedures were performed from January 2004 to June 2005. The group consisted of predominantly nonsmoking, Caucasian, postmenopausal women with a median age of 62 years and a median parity of 3. The mean follow-up was 33 +/- 23.2 weeks with a median of 31.9 weeks. There were no intraoperative bladder, bowel, or vascular injuries. Overall, 11 out of 90 patients developed recurrent or de novo prolapse; 4.4% of these had recurrent apical prolapse. There was a 17.8% incidence of mesh erosion. Only 1 of the 11 patients with recurrent prolapse had concomitant mesh erosion. The procedure demonstrated an unacceptably high erosion rate. The adoption of newer mesh techniques based on the slingplasty concept or the use of the multifilament polypropylene tape should be scrutinized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18097626     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-007-0527-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  17 in total

1.  High incidence of vaginal mesh extrusion using the intravaginal slingplasty sling.

Authors:  Andrew L Siegel; Michelle Kim; Martin Goldstein; Stuart Levey; Pedram Ilbeigi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy.

Authors:  J O DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Genesis of the vaginal profile: a correlated classification of vaginal relaxation.

Authors:  W F Baden; T A Walker
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation.

Authors:  J T Benson; V Lucente; E McClellan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Pelvic support defects and visceral and sexual function in women treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension and pelvic reconstruction.

Authors:  M F Paraiso; L A Ballard; M D Walters; J C Lee; A R Mitchinson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Posterior intra-vaginal slingplasty for the treatment of vaginal apex prolapse: Medium-term results of 140 operations with a novel procedure.

Authors:  M Neuman; Y Lavy
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  The multifilament polypropylene tape erosion trouble: tape structure vs surgical technique. Which one is the cause?

Authors:  Ahmet Akin Sivaslioglu; Eylem Unlubilgin; Ismail Dölen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-09-18

9.  Recurrent pelvic support defects after sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  R L Holley; R E Varner; B P Gleason; L A Apffel; S Scott
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Christopher F Maher; Aymen M Qatawneh; Peter L Dwyer; Marcus P Carey; Ann Cornish; Philip J Schluter
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  7 in total

1.  Posterior intravaginal slingplasty: efficacy and complications in a continuous series of 118 cases.

Authors:  Stefano Cosma; Mario Preti; Marco Mitidieri; Paolo Petruzzelli; Federica Possavino; Guido Menato
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  [Vaginal pelvic repair. Always with mesh or not?].

Authors:  H Loertzer; R H Ringert; A Fechner; P Thelen; C Kümmel; A Strauss
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Application of a Mixed Material Graft to Posterior Intravaginal Slingoplasty Procedure: Preliminary Pilot Series.

Authors:  Birol Vural; Yigit Çakıroglu; Fisun Vural; Sule Köpük Yıldırım
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-05-01

4.  Anatomical and functional outcomes of posterior intravaginal slingplasty for the treatment of vaginal vault or uterine prolapse: a prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  Young-Suk Lee; Deok Hyun Han; Ji Youl Lee; Joon Chul Kim; Myung-Soo Choo; Kyu-Sung Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-03-19

5.  Gluteo-vaginal fistula after posterior intravaginal slingplasty: a case report.

Authors:  Michael Grynberg; Jacques Teyssedre; Frederic Staerman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-11-11

6.  Posterior Intravaginal Slingplasty versus Unilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in Treatment of Vaginal Vault Prolapse.

Authors:  Virva Nyyssönen; Anne Talvensaari-Mattila; Markku Santala
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08-13

7.  The Posterior Intravaginal Slingplasty treatment for apical prolapse: 3 years experience in a single centre setting.

Authors:  P Hinoul; R Vanspauwen; S Smajda; J-P Roovers
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2010
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.