Literature DB >> 8987920

Pelvic support defects and visceral and sexual function in women treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension and pelvic reconstruction.

M F Paraiso1, L A Ballard, M D Walters, J C Lee, A R Mitchinson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and consequences of sacrospinous ligament suspension and pelvic reconstruction. STUDY
DESIGN: Patients who underwent sacrospinous ligament suspension between 1978 and 1991 were evaluated from follow-up visits, telephone interviews, questionnaires, and chart reviews. Before and after operation, vaginal support was graded in three segments. Postoperative visceral and sexual function was evaluated.
RESULTS: Mean length of follow-up for 243 patients was 73.6 months. Of these, 102 (42.0%) had a support defect in at least one segment; anterior, posterior, and apical defects were found in 91 (37.4%), 33 (13.6%), and 20 (8.2%) patients, respectively. A clinically significant defect was defined as a symptomatic first-degree or any second-or third-degree prolapse. Defect-free survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 88.3%, 79.7%, and 51.9%, respectively. Eleven patients (4.5%) underwent subsequent pelvic reconstruction.
CONCLUSION: Sacrospinous ligament suspension and pelvic reconstruction are effective for vaginal apex support, but vaginal prolapse recurs with time, most commonly in the anterior segment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8987920     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70085-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  30 in total

Review 1.  The use and misuse of prosthetic materials in reconstructive pelvic surgery: does the evidence support our surgical practice?

Authors:  Mark D Walters
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2003-12-02

2.  Vaginal invagination: definition, clinical presentation and surgical management.

Authors:  Corina Schmid; Peter O'Rourke; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Pelvic Prolapse Repair in the Era of Mesh.

Authors:  Natalie Gaines; Priyanka Gupta; Larry T Sirls
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Surgical management of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidencebased literature review.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Kaven Baessler
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-05-25

5.  Operations and pelvic muscle training in the management of apical support loss (OPTIMAL) trial: design and methods.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Linda Brubaker; Shawn Menefee; Peggy Norton; Diane Borello-France; Edward Varner; Joseph Schaffer; Alison Weidner; Xiao Xu; Cathie Spino; Anne Weber
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 6.  Uterine-preserving POP surgery.

Authors:  Robert Gutman; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Anterior colporrhaphy reinforced with Marlex mesh for the treatment of cystoceles.

Authors:  C G Flood; H P Drutz; L Waja
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1998

8.  Sexual function after sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse: bad or mad?

Authors:  Marc Baumann; Claudia Salvisberg; Michel Mueller; Annette Kuhn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Management of arterial and venous hemorrhage during sacrospinous ligament fixation: cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Avita K Pahwa; Lily A Arya; Uduak U Andy
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Anatomical and functional outcomes of posterior intravaginal slingplasty for the treatment of vaginal vault or uterine prolapse: a prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  Young-Suk Lee; Deok Hyun Han; Ji Youl Lee; Joon Chul Kim; Myung-Soo Choo; Kyu-Sung Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.