Literature DB >> 28658857

Application of a Mixed Material Graft to Posterior Intravaginal Slingoplasty Procedure: Preliminary Pilot Series.

Birol Vural1, Yigit Çakıroglu2, Fisun Vural3, Sule Köpük Yıldırım4.   

Abstract

Good anatomic outcomes have been achieved with transvaginal synthetic materials in pelvic organ prolapse, but mesh-related complications are a major health concern. Therefore, developing new synthetic or biological materials with increased tissue strength and decreased complications are major challenges. This paper presents preliminary pilot series of Posterior Intravaginal Slingoplasty (PIVS) procedure performed with mixed material graft containing both autologous tissue and a synthetic material. Six women with symptomatic Utero-Vaginal Prolapse (UVP) ≥ stage 2 underwent the PIVS procedure. Pelvic floor symptoms were assessed with the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI), and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) both before the procedure and 36 months after the surgery. There were no mesh-related complications or recurrence and all the patients had good functional and anatomic outcomes. These preliminary results are promising, but further long-term studies with a larger series are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autologous graft; Polypropylene mesh; Utero-vaginal prolapsed

Year:  2017        PMID: 28658857      PMCID: PMC5483759          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/22017.9804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  16 in total

1.  Vaginal wall sling.

Authors:  S Raz; A L Siegel; J L Short; J A Snyder; J A Synder
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Comparison of the Efficiency of Posterior Intravaginal Sling (PIVS) Procedure in Older and Younger Groups.

Authors:  Tolgay Tuyan Ilhan; Akin Sivaslioglu; Türkan Ilhan; Mustafa Gazi Uçar; İsmail Dolen
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-07-01

3.  The effect of vaginal pelvic organ prolapse surgery on sexual function.

Authors:  Daniela Ulrich; Peter Dwyer; Anna Rosamilia; Yik Lim; Joseph Lee
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 4.  Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Benjamin Feiner; Kaven Baessler; Elisabeth J Adams; Suzanne Hagen; Cathryn Ma Glazener
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

Review 5.  Complications of vaginal mesh surgery.

Authors:  Christopher J Chermansky; J Christian Winters
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 6.  Risk factors for surgical failure after posterior intravaginal slingplasty: a case series.

Authors:  Huey-Yi Chen; Ming Ho; Yin-Yi Chang; Yao-Ching Hung; Wen-Chi Chen
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Anatomical and functional outcomes of posterior intravaginal slingplasty for the treatment of vaginal vault or uterine prolapse: a prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  Young-Suk Lee; Deok Hyun Han; Ji Youl Lee; Joon Chul Kim; Myung-Soo Choo; Kyu-Sung Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-03-19

8.  Short-term efficacy and complications of posterior intravaginal slingplasty.

Authors:  Ali M Luck; Andrew C Steele; Fah Che Leong; Mary T McLennan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-06

9.  Efficacy and 9 years' follow-up of posterior intravaginal slingplasty for genital prolapse.

Authors:  Giampiero Capobianco; Ermes Donolo; Jean Marie Wenger; Massimo Madonia; Erich Cosmi; Lavinia Antimi; Margherita Dessole; Pier Luigi Cherchi
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 10.  Functional anatomy of the female pelvic floor.

Authors:  James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.