Literature DB >> 18097080

Dose, exposure time and resolution in serial X-ray crystallography.

D Starodub1, P Rez, G Hembree, M Howells, D Shapiro, H N Chapman, P Fromme, K Schmidt, U Weierstall, R B Doak, J C H Spence.   

Abstract

The resolution of X-ray diffraction microscopy is limited by the maximum dose that can be delivered prior to sample damage. In the proposed serial crystallography method, the damage problem is addressed by distributing the total dose over many identical hydrated macromolecules running continuously in a single-file train across a continuous X-ray beam, and resolution is then limited only by the available molecular and X-ray fluxes and molecular alignment. Orientation of the diffracting molecules is achieved by laser alignment. The incident X-ray fluence (energy/area) is evaluated that is required to obtain a given resolution from (i) an analytical model, giving the count rate at the maximum scattering angle for a model protein, (ii) explicit simulation of diffraction patterns for a GroEL-GroES protein complex, and (iii) the spatial frequency cut-off of the transfer function following iterative solution of the phase problem, and reconstruction of an electron density map in the projection approximation. These calculations include counting shot noise and multiple starts of the phasing algorithm. The results indicate counting time and the number of proteins needed within the beam at any instant for a given resolution and X-ray flux. An inverse fourth-power dependence of exposure time on resolution is confirmed, with important implications for all coherent X-ray imaging. It is found that multiple single-file protein beams will be needed for sub-nanometer resolution on current third-generation synchrotrons, but not on fourth-generation designs, where reconstruction of secondary protein structure at a resolution of 7 A should be possible with relatively short exposures.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18097080     DOI: 10.1107/S0909049507048893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat        ISSN: 0909-0495            Impact factor:   2.616


  10 in total

1.  Room temperature femtosecond X-ray diffraction of photosystem II microcrystals.

Authors:  Jan Kern; Roberto Alonso-Mori; Julia Hellmich; Rosalie Tran; Johan Hattne; Hartawan Laksmono; Carina Glöckner; Nathaniel Echols; Raymond G Sierra; Jonas Sellberg; Benedikt Lassalle-Kaiser; Richard J Gildea; Pieter Glatzel; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Matthew J Latimer; Trevor A McQueen; Dörte DiFiore; Alan R Fry; Marc Messerschmidt; Alan Miahnahri; Donald W Schafer; M Marvin Seibert; Dimosthenis Sokaras; Tsu-Chien Weng; Petrus H Zwart; William E White; Paul D Adams; Michael J Bogan; Sébastien Boutet; Garth J Williams; Johannes Messinger; Nicholas K Sauter; Athina Zouni; Uwe Bergmann; Junko Yano; Vittal K Yachandra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Experimental approaches for solution X-ray scattering and fiber diffraction.

Authors:  H Tsuruta; T C Irving
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-09-29       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  An assessment of the resolution limitation due to radiation-damage in x-ray diffraction microscopy.

Authors:  M R Howells; T Beetz; H N Chapman; C Cui; J M Holton; C J Jacobsen; J Kirz; E Lima; S Marchesini; H Miao; D Sayre; D A Shapiro; J C H Spence; D Starodub
Journal:  J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 1.957

4.  The minimum crystal size needed for a complete diffraction data set.

Authors:  James M Holton; Kenneth A Frankel
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-03-24

5.  Relative merits and limiting factors for x-ray and electron microscopy of thick, hydrated organic materials.

Authors:  Ming Du; Chris Jacobsen
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 6.  XFELs for structure and dynamics in biology.

Authors:  J C H Spence
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.769

7.  Signal enhancement and Patterson-search phasing for high-spatial-resolution coherent X-ray diffraction imaging of biological objects.

Authors:  Yuki Takayama; Saori Maki-Yonekura; Tomotaka Oroguchi; Masayoshi Nakasako; Koji Yonekura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A comparison of absorption and phase contrast for X-ray imaging of biological cells.

Authors:  Colin Nave
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 2.616

9.  The achievable resolution for X-ray imaging of cells and other soft biological material.

Authors:  Colin Nave
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 4.769

10.  High-fluence and high-gain multilayer focusing optics to enhance spatial resolution in femtosecond X-ray laser imaging.

Authors:  Hirokatsu Yumoto; Takahisa Koyama; Akihiro Suzuki; Yasumasa Joti; Yoshiya Niida; Kensuke Tono; Yoshitaka Bessho; Makina Yabashi; Yoshinori Nishino; Haruhiko Ohashi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 17.694

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.