Literature DB >> 18096133

A comparison of human jaw muscle cross-sectional area and volume in long- and short-face subjects, using MRI.

H P W Boom1, P H van Spronsen, F C van Ginkel, R A van Schijndel, J A Castelijns, D B Tuinzing.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In humans, the vertical craniofacial dimensions vary significantly with the size of the jaw muscles, which are regarded as important controlling factors of craniofacial growth. The functional relevance of the maximum cross-sectional area (CSA), indicating maximum muscle strength, is questionable since peak forces are generated only a fraction of the day. Alternatively, muscle volume (indicating the generated loads) might be a more meaningful functional variable. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate if jaw muscle volume is stronger related with vertical craniofacial dimensions than with jaw muscle CSA.
DESIGN: Thirty-one adult healthy subjects with varying vertical craniofacial morphology participated in this study. Axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were used for segmentation of the masseter (Mas) and medial pterygoid muscles (MPM). This enabled measurements of the muscle CSA and volume. Cephalometric analysis was performed using lateral radiographs. With factor analysis, the number of cephalometric variables was reduced into two factors that represented the anterior face height and the posterior face height (PFH), respectively. Subsequently, mutual relationships between these factors and muscular variables were assessed using a multiple regression analysis.
RESULTS: It was found that vertical craniofacial dimensions were significantly better (up to 12%) related with muscle volume rather than with CSA. Furthermore, it was shown that especially the PFH factor was significantly correlated with the Mas and MPM.
CONCLUSION: Vertical craniofacial dimensions are stronger related with jaw muscle volume than with CSA. Tentatively, it can be assumed that the generated muscle loads, rather than maximum forces, influence vertical craniofacial growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18096133     DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Oral Biol        ISSN: 0003-9969            Impact factor:   2.633


  18 in total

1.  Three-dimensional observation of mouse tongue muscles using micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Hidekazu Aoyagi; Shin-Ichi Iwasaki; Kenzirou Nakamura
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Automatic 3D segmentation of individual facial muscles using unlabeled prior information.

Authors:  Yousef Rezaeitabar; Ilkay Ulusoy
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Effects of wear time differences of removable functional appliances in class II patients: prospective MRI study of TMJ and masticatory muscle changes.

Authors:  Emre Cesur; Orhan Özdiler; Ayşegül Köklü; Kaan Orhan; Umut Seki
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Human masseter muscle fiber type properties, skeletal malocclusions, and muscle growth factor expression.

Authors:  James Joseph Sciote; Michael J Horton; Anthea M Rowlerson; Joel Ferri; John M Close; Gwenael Raoul
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings of the temporomandibular joint and masticatory muscles in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Hasan Huseyin Yilmaz; Derya Yildirim; Yunus Ugan; Sevket Ercan Tunc; Ahmet Yesildag; Hikmet Orhan; Cevriye Akdag
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 6.  The role of craniofacial maldevelopment in the modern OSA epidemic: a scoping review.

Authors:  Jason L Yu; Akshay Tangutur; Eric Thuler; Marianna Evans; Raj C Dedhia
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.062

7.  Influence of Age and Tooth Loss on Masticatory Muscles Characteristics: A Population Based MR Imaging Study.

Authors:  A Daboul; C Schwahn; R Bülow; S Kiliaridis; T Kocher; T Klinke; T Mundt; S Mourad; H Völzke; M Habes; R Biffar
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.075

8.  Three-dimensional temporomandibular joint muscle attachment morphometry and its impacts on musculoskeletal modeling.

Authors:  Xin She; Feng Wei; Brooke J Damon; Matthew C Coombs; Daniel G Lee; Michael K Lecholop; Thierry H Bacro; Martin B Steed; Naiquan Zheng; Xiaojing Chen; Hai Yao
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Masseter muscle changes following orthognathic surgery: a long-term three-dimensional computed tomography follow-up.

Authors:  Da-Hye Lee; Hyung-Seog Yu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Age and side-related morphometric MRI evaluation of trunk muscles in people without back pain.

Authors:  Stephanie Valentin; Theresia Licka; James Elliott
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2014-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.