Literature DB >> 30166225

Three-dimensional temporomandibular joint muscle attachment morphometry and its impacts on musculoskeletal modeling.

Xin She1, Feng Wei1, Brooke J Damon2, Matthew C Coombs2, Daniel G Lee3, Michael K Lecholop3, Thierry H Bacro4, Martin B Steed3, Naiquan Zheng5, Xiaojing Chen6, Hai Yao7.   

Abstract

In musculoskeletal models of the human temporomandibular joint (TMJ), muscles are typically represented by force vectors that connect approximate muscle origin and insertion centroids (centroid-to-centroid force vectors). This simplification assumes equivalent moment arms and muscle lengths for all fibers within a muscle even with complex geometry and may result in inaccurate estimations of muscle force and joint loading. The objectives of this study were to quantify the three-dimensional (3D) human TMJ muscle attachment morphometry and examine its impact on TMJ mechanics. 3D muscle attachment surfaces of temporalis, masseter, lateral pterygoid, and medial pterygoid muscles of human cadaveric heads were generated by co-registering measured attachment boundaries with underlying skull models created from cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) images. A bounding box technique was used to quantify 3D muscle attachment size, shape, location, and orientation. Musculoskeletal models of the mandible were then developed and validated to assess the impact of 3D muscle attachment morphometry on joint loading during jaw maximal open-close. The 3D morphometry revealed that muscle lengths and moment arms of temporalis and masseter muscles varied substantially among muscle fibers. The values calculated from the centroid-to-centroid model were significantly different from those calculated using the 'Distributed model', which considered crucial 3D muscle attachment morphometry. Consequently, joint loading was underestimated by more than 50% in the centroid-to-centroid model. Therefore, it is necessary to consider 3D muscle attachment morphometry, especially for muscles with broad attachments, in TMJ musculoskeletal models to precisely quantify the joint mechanical environment critical for understanding TMJ function and mechanobiology.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D morphometry; Moment arm; Muscle attachment; Musculoskeletal modeling; Temporomandibular joint

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30166225      PMCID: PMC6239209          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  44 in total

1.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the human temporomandibular joint disc.

Authors:  M Beek; J H Koolstra; L J van Ruijven; T M van Eijden
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Dynamic stereometry of the temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  S Palla; L M Gallo; D Gössi
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 3.  Where tendons and ligaments meet bone: attachment sites ('entheses') in relation to exercise and/or mechanical load.

Authors:  M Benjamin; H Toumi; J R Ralphs; G Bydder; T M Best; S Milz
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Relationships between the size and spatial morphology of human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles, the craniofacial skeleton, and jaw biomechanics.

Authors:  A G Hannam; W W Wood
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.868

5.  The functional significance of the position of the centre of rotation for jaw opening and closing in the rabbit.

Authors:  W A Weijs; J A Korfage; G J Langenbach
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Muscle activity patterns and control of temporomandibular joint loads.

Authors:  G S Throckmorton; G J Groshan; S B Boyd
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  [Morphological study of the sacroiliac joint of aged Japanese and macroscopic and microscopic observations on its articular surface].

Authors:  S Ohba
Journal:  Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1985-07

8.  Combined finite-element and rigid-body analysis of human jaw joint dynamics.

Authors:  J H Koolstra; T M G J van Eijden
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-12-30       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  A three-dimensional mathematical model of temporomandibular joint loading.

Authors:  B May; S Saha; M Saltzman
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  A comparison of human masseter muscle thickness measured by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M C Raadsheer; T M Van Eijden; P H Van Spronsen; F C Van Ginkel; S Kiliaridis; B Prahl-Andersen
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.633

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sexual dimorphisms in three-dimensional masticatory muscle attachment morphometry regulates temporomandibular joint mechanics.

Authors:  Xin She; Shuchun Sun; Brooke J Damon; Cherice N Hill; Matthew C Coombs; Feng Wei; Michael K Lecholop; Martin B Steed; Thierry H Bacro; Elizabeth H Slate; Naiquan Zheng; Janice S Lee; Hai Yao
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Evaluating the morphological features of the lateral pterygoid insertion into the medial surface of the condylar process.

Authors:  Sasin Sritara; Masahiro Tsutsumi; Keiko Fukino; Yoshiro Matsumoto; Takashi Ono; Keiichi Akita
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2020-11-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.