Literature DB >> 18093768

Relationship between loudness growth function and auditory steady-state response in normal-hearing subjects.

Mikaël Ménard1, Stéphane Gallégo, Christian Berger-Vachon, Lionel Collet, Hung Thai-Van.   

Abstract

The present study investigates the relationship between auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) and loudness growth function. ASSR amplitudes were compared to the perceived loudness level at frequencies of 500 and 2000Hz in 11 normal-hearing subjects. As a first step, loudness growth function was estimated for the two test frequencies. Then ASSR amplitude was recorded for each of the two frequencies at different stimulus intensities, each corresponding to a loudness level as given by the first part of the study. Normalized results show that the ASSR amplitude correlates well with the loudness function (R(2)=0.81). A stepwise multiple linear regression confirmed these results with loudness explaining almost all the ASSR amplitude (loudness R(2)=0.81, p<0.001, f=562 and for intensity f=1.1, p=0.29). The non-linearity of the ASSR amplitude for low loudness levels can be explained by both the active amplification in the cochlea and the noise in the recording. The results suggest that ASSRs can be used for "objective" loudness measurement.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18093768     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  12 in total

1.  Towards an optimal paradigm for intraoperative auditory nerve monitoring with auditory steady state responses.

Authors:  Stefan Rampp; Leonhard Rensch; Sebastian Simmermacher; Torsten Rahne; Christian Strauss; Julian Prell
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Neural representations of complex temporal modulations in the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Relations among Auditory Brainstem and Middle Latency Response Measures, Categorical Loudness Judgments, and Their Associated Physical Intensities.

Authors:  Peggy A Korczak; LaGuinn P Sherlock; Monica L Hawley; Craig Formby
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

4.  The auditory enhancement effect is not reflected in the 80-Hz auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack; Arthur Portron; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-21

Review 5.  Auditory Brainstem and Middle Latency Responses Measured Pre- and Posttreatment for Hyperacusic Hearing-Impaired Persons Successfully Treated to Improve Sound Tolerance and to Expand the Dynamic Range for Loudness: Case Evidence.

Authors:  Craig Formby; Peggy Korczak; LaGuinn P Sherlock; Monica L Hawley; Susan Gold
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

Review 6.  Clinical and investigational tools for monitoring noise-induced hyperacusis.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.482

7.  New perspectives on the measurement and time course of auditory enhancement.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Auditory steady state responses in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults: an analysis of between-session amplitude and latency repeatability, test time, and F ratio detection paradigms.

Authors:  Timothy S Wilding; Colette M McKay; Richard J Baker; Karolina Kluk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Using auditory steady-state responses for measuring hearing protector occlusion effect.

Authors:  Olivier Valentin; Frédéric Laville
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.867

10.  Auditory steady state responses and cochlear implants: Modeling the artifact-response mixture in the perspective of denoising.

Authors:  Faten Mina; Virginie Attina; Yvan Duroc; Evelyne Veuillet; Eric Truy; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.