Literature DB >> 18093644

Experimental and theoretical characterization of implantable neural microelectrodes modified with conducting polymer nanotubes.

Mohammad Reza Abidian1, David C Martin.   

Abstract

Neural prostheses transduce bioelectric signals to electronic signals at the interface between neural tissue and neural microelectrodes. A low impedance electrode-tissue interface is important for the quality of signal during recording as well as quantity of applied charge density during stimulation. However, neural microelectrode sites exhibit high impedance because of their small geometric surface area. Here we analyze nanostructured-conducting polymers that can be used to significantly decrease the impedance of microelectrode typically by about two orders of magnitude and increase the charge transfer capacity of microelectrodes by three orders of magnitude. In this study poly(pyrrole) (PPy) and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) nanotubes were electrochemically polymerized on the surface of neural microelectrode sites (1250 microm(2)). An equivalent circuit model comprising a coating capacitance in parallel with a pore resistance and interface impedance in series was developed and fitted to experimental results to characterize the physical and electrical properties of the interface. To confirm that the fitting parameters correlate with physical quantities of interface, theoretical equations were used to calculate the parameter values thereby validating the proposed model. Finally, an apparent diffusion coefficient was calculated for PPy film (29.2+/-1.1 x 10(-6) cm(2)/s), PPy nanotubes (PPy NTs) (72.4+/-3.3 x 10(-6) cm(2)/s), PEDOT film (7.4+/-2.1 x 10(-6) cm(2)/s), and PEDOT nanotubes (PEDOT NTs) (13.0+/-1.8 x 10(-6) cm(2)/s). The apparent diffusion coefficient of conducting polymer nanotubes was larger than the corresponding conducting polymer films.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18093644      PMCID: PMC2692518          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  16 in total

Review 1.  Biomolecule immobilization on electrode surfaces by entrapment or attachment to electrochemically polymerized films. A review.

Authors:  S Cosnier
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  1999-05-31       Impact factor: 10.618

2.  An array of Pt-tip microelectrodes for extracellular monitoring of activity of brain slices.

Authors:  P Thiébaud; C Beuret; M Koudelka-Hep; M Bove; S Martinoia; M Grattarola; H Jahnsen; R Rebaudo; M Balestrino; J Zimmer; Y Dupont
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 10.618

Review 3.  Application of conducting polymers to biosensors.

Authors:  Manju Gerard; Asha Chaubey; B D Malhotra
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.618

4.  Linear and nonlinear electrode polarization and biological materials.

Authors:  H P Schwan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Stimulation of neurite outgrowth using an electrically conducting polymer.

Authors:  C E Schmidt; V R Shastri; J P Vacanti; R Langer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Biosensors from conjugated polyelectrolyte complexes.

Authors:  Deli Wang; Xiong Gong; Peter S Heeger; Frauke Rininsland; Guillermo C Bazan; Alan J Heeger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Conducting-Polymer Nanotubes for Controlled Drug Release.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Abidian; Dong-Hwan Kim; David C Martin
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 30.849

8.  Linear and nonlinear properties of platinum electrode polarisation. Part 1: frequency dependence at very low frequencies.

Authors:  B Onaral; H P Schwan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Fabrication and biocompatibility of polypyrrole implants suitable for neural prosthetics.

Authors:  Paul M George; Alvin W Lyckman; David A LaVan; Anita Hegde; Yuika Leung; Rupali Avasare; Chris Testa; Phillip M Alexander; Robert Langer; Mriganka Sur
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Chronic neural recordings using silicon microelectrode arrays electrochemically deposited with a poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) film.

Authors:  Kip A Ludwig; Jeffrey D Uram; Junyan Yang; David C Martin; Daryl R Kipke
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 5.379

View more
  50 in total

Review 1.  Implantable neurotechnologies: a review of micro- and nanoelectrodes for neural recording.

Authors:  Anoop C Patil; Nitish V Thakor
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Advanced neurotechnologies for chronic neural interfaces: new horizons and clinical opportunities.

Authors:  Daryl R Kipke; William Shain; György Buzsáki; E Fetz; Jaimie M Henderson; Jamille F Hetke; Gerwin Schalk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Evolution of brain-computer interfaces: going beyond classic motor physiology.

Authors:  Eric C Leuthardt; Gerwin Schalk; Jarod Roland; Adam Rouse; Daniel W Moran
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.047

4.  Attenuation of the in vitro neurotoxicity of 316L SS by graphene oxide surface coating.

Authors:  Nishat Tasnim; Alok Kumar; Binata Joddar
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 7.328

5.  Zwitterionic Porous Conjugated Polymers as a Versatile Platform for Antibiofouling Implantable Bioelectronics.

Authors:  Jinjia Xu; Jian Xu; Haesoo Moon; Herman O Sintim; Hyowon Lee
Journal:  ACS Appl Polym Mater       Date:  2020-02-05

Review 6.  A review of organic and inorganic biomaterials for neural interfaces.

Authors:  Pouria Fattahi; Guang Yang; Gloria Kim; Mohammad Reza Abidian
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 7.  Conducting polymer-hydrogels for medical electrode applications.

Authors:  Rylie A Green; Sungchul Baek; Laura A Poole-Warren; Penny J Martens
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 8.090

8.  Rough Gold Electrodes for Decreasing Impedance at the Electrolyte/Electrode Interface.

Authors:  Anil Koklu; Ahmet C Sabuncu; Ali Beskok
Journal:  Electrochim Acta       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 6.901

9.  Conducting-polymer nanotubes improve electrical properties, mechanical adhesion, neural attachment, and neurite outgrowth of neural electrodes.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Abidian; Joseph M Corey; Daryl R Kipke; David C Martin
Journal:  Small       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 13.281

10.  Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) as a Micro-Neural Interface Material for Electrostimulation.

Authors:  Seth J Wilks; Sarah M Richardson-Burns; Jeffrey L Hendricks; David C Martin; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2009-06-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.