Literature DB >> 23595039

Comparison of 2 anal cytology protocols to predict high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia.

Dorothy JoAnn Wiley1, Hilary Hsu, Robert Bolan, Alen Voskanian, David Elashoff, Stephen Young, Ruvy Dayrit, Provaboti Barman, Katherine DeAzambuja, Emmanuel V Masongsong, Otoniel Martínez-Maza, Roger Detels.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Nylon-flocked and Dacron swab anal cytology collection procedures were evaluated for detecting high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional data for 42 HIV-infected and 16 uninfected men who have sex with men have been used. Sequentially collected anal cytology specimens, high-resolution anoscopy, and medical biopsy evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of cytology for predicting high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia. Men showing atypical squamous cells (ASC) or more severe findings by cytology were compared with those showing negative for intraepithelial lesions.
RESULTS: The prevalence of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia was 35% (21/58), and findings were approximately 1.5 times higher among HIV-infected compared with uninfected men. Unsatisfactory cytology was twice as common among Dacron compared with nylon-flocked swab protocol specimens (14% [8/58] vs 7% [4/58]). Sensitivity and specificity for the nylon-flocked protocol cytology showing ASC or more severe findings were 81% (58%-95%) and 73% (50%-89%), respectively. Dacron protocol specimens showed 52% (30%-74%) and 58% (34%-80%) sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Men showing ASC or more severe findings using the nylon-flocked protocol cytology showed 3-fold higher odds for high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia compared with men with negative results (p < .05), but no statistically significantly higher odds of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia for men showing ASC or more severe findings compared with those with negative results for Dacron protocol cytology (p > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The nylon-flocked protocol better detects high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia than does the Dacron protocol, yields more interpretable results, and classifies men with high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia as cytologically abnormal 2.5 times more often, even in this small clinical trial. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00955591.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23595039      PMCID: PMC3788863          DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e318281d36e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  69 in total

1.  Factors associated with prevalent abnormal anal cytology in a large cohort of HIV-infected adults in the United States.

Authors:  L Conley; T Bush; T M Darragh; J M Palefsky; E R Unger; P Patel; E M Kojic; S Cu-Uvin; H Martin; E T Overton; J Hammer; K Henry; C Vellozzi; K Wood; J T Brooks
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Is liquid-based pap testing affected by water-based lubricant?

Authors:  Jon K Hathaway; Pramod K Pathak; Rhonda Maney
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.

Authors:  M E Boon; J C de Graaff Guilloud; W J Rietveld
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.319

4.  Age-related prevalence of anal cancer precursors in homosexual men: the EXPLORE study.

Authors:  Peter V Chin-Hong; Eric Vittinghoff; Ross D Cranston; Lynette Browne; Susan Buchbinder; Grant Colfax; Maria Da Costa; Teresa Darragh; Dana Jones Benet; Franklyn Judson; Beryl Koblin; Kenneth H Mayer; Joel M Palefsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Studies on the distribution of abnormal cells in cytologic preparations. IV. Importance of the topographical position of the cells in material collected by wooden spatulas.

Authors:  C A Rubio; K Berglund; Y Kock
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  The value of anal cytology and human papillomavirus typing in the detection of anal intraepithelial neoplasia: a review of cases from an anoscopy clinic.

Authors:  P A Fox; J E Seet; J Stebbing; N Francis; S E Barton; S Strauss; T G Allen-Mersh; B G Gazzard; M Bower
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.519

7.  Expectant management of anal squamous dysplasia in patients with HIV.

Authors:  Bikash Devaraj; Bard C Cosman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Blind sampling is superior to anoscope guided sampling for screening for anal intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  C M Vajdic; J S Anderson; R J Hillman; G Medley; A E Grulich
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.519

9.  Infrared coagulator ablation of high-grade anal squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV-negative males who have sex with males.

Authors:  Stephen E Goldstone; Joshua S Hundert; Jeff W Huyett
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  The prevalence, and predictive value, of abnormal anal cytology to diagnose anal dysplasia in a population of HIV-positive men who have sex with men.

Authors:  R D Cranston; S D Hart; J A Gornbein; S L Hirschowitz; G Cortina; A A Moe
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.359

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Screening for Anal Cancer in Women.

Authors:  Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Teresa M Darragh; J Michael Berry-Lawhorn; Jennifer M Roberts; Michelle J Khan; Lori A Boardman; Elizabeth Chiao; Mark H Einstein; Stephen E Goldstone; Naomi Jay; Wendy M Likes; Elizabeth A Stier; Mark L Welton; Dorothy J Wiley; Joel M Palefsky
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Practice parameters for the diagnosis and treatment of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) on behalf of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR).

Authors:  G A Binda; G Gagliardi; I Dal Conte; M Verra; P Cassoni; E Cavazzoni; E Stocco; S Delmonte; P De Nardi; L Sticchi; M Mistrangelo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Comparison of nylon-flocked swab and Dacron swab cytology for anal HSIL detection in transgender women and gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Dorothy J Wiley; Hilary K Hsu; Martha A Ganser; Jenny Brook; David A Elashoff; Matthew G Moran; Stephen A Young; Nancy E Joste; Ronald Mitsuyasu; Teresa M Darragh; David H Morris; Otoniel M Martínez-Maza; Roger Detels; Jian Yu Rao; Robert K Bolan; Eric T Shigeno; Ernesto Rodriguez
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Establishing the accuracy of a new and cheaper sample collection tool: Oral cytology versus oral histopathology.

Authors:  Anubhuti Sood; Deepika Mishra; Rahul Yadav; Krushna Bhatt; Harsh Priya; Harpreet Kaur
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2020-05-08

5.  Some are more equal--a comparative study on swab uptake and release of bacterial suspensions.

Authors:  Philipp Warnke; Liesa Warning; Andreas Podbielski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.